"The solution is quite stable."
"Azure Monitor is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."
"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."
"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."
"Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."
"We like this searchability and availability of the data."
"Provides an overview and high-level information."
"The most valuable features are the agility, being able to ingest many data sources with no limitation on capacity."
"We liked the built-in calculation of health scores."
"The flexibility to develop and consolidate many solutions into one platform is great."
"The modeling required to setup ITSI has been very helpful in providing us a better understanding and a logical view of our services. The modeling is flexible and can be as granular or high level as our needs dictate."
"When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible."
"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"The process of implementation needs to be easier."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"The price could be lower but it is not a must."
"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
"ITSI could benefit from a security model that would allow operations team members to get involved in model building, KPI implementation, and model maintenance, while maintaining appropriate segregation of duties."
"The problem becomes the price, as Splunk is an expensive product."
"We also faced challenges relating to UI development."
Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.
Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) enables IT and service leaders to prevent issues before they impact customers. Unlike traditional monitoring and analytics solutions that aggravate IT complexity, ITSI correlates and applies machine learning to all metric, event and trace data for 360 service monitoring, predictive alerting, and streamlined event management.
Azure Monitor is ranked 8th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 9 reviews while Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is ranked 16th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.2, while Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Requires out of the box monitoring, real-time monitoring, and better network mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) writes "Monitoring and analytics with comprehensive visibility, is agile, and integrates well, but the price can be reduced". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk, Dynatrace, New Relic APM and Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope, whereas Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Loom Systems, Moogsoft and SolarWinds NPM. See our Azure Monitor vs. Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.