We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and BMC TrueSight Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Management (APM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."
"It has good troubleshooting features."
"In the last company where I worked about a year ago, it looked very simple."
"It's a Microsoft native tool, so it works well with other Microsoft technologies, which is predominantly what our customer end-user base is."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"It is a move-in powerful feature compared to other market-leading tools."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."
"I like everything about this tool. I recommend this solution to anyone looking for a standalone solution with high availability meaning that can be used depending on the customers requirements."
"What I like best about BMC TrueSight Operations Management is that it allows you to do granular monitoring and improves VM load."
"Helix Innovation Studio is a very good feature. It allows us to develop our own enterprise applications and make them available for the customers."
"The most valuable features of BMC TrueSight Operations Management are the blackouts and event management."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is the dashboard presentation server."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."
"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."
"If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill."
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"It might not have all of the capabilities we will need."
"The default interface should be improved."
"The solution needs better monitoring. It requires better log controls."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"There are some small limitations with this tool in terms of reporting dashboards that fit all of the requirements of the individual customer."
"This solution is lacking in application monitoring features. Technical support for this solution also needs improvement, particularly in product knowledge and response time."
"The stability of BMC TrueSight Operations Management needs improvement. My organization's infrastructure is vast and implemented based on BMC recommendations, but the solution needs to be optimized for large-capacity infrastructure."
"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."
"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."
"It would be better if the initial setup and deployment were more straightforward."
"The pricing could be better."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 25 reviews while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 7th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 13 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Helps us test the performance and efficiency of cloud applications; good log analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "It improves VM load and has good documentation with easy-to-follow steps on how to set it up, but it has room for improvement in terms of scalability and stability". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security, Dynatrace, New Relic and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront, whereas BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Dynatrace, Splunk Enterprise Security and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. See our Azure Monitor vs. BMC TrueSight Operations Management report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
