We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and BMC TrueSight Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Azure Monitor is the preferred option due to its ease of setup, low-cost pricing, and integration with other Microsoft technologies. It also provides a more convenient and efficient solution for developers by offering a one-stop place to monitor all cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard. BMC TrueSight Operations Management has valuable features, but needs improvement in areas such as cloud monitoring, reporting dashboards, and pricing.
"It is a robust, stable product."
"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."
"Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."
"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"The tailoring of the knowledge modules has been particularly useful as I can streamline the agents to only report on critical events."
"The initial setup of BMC TrueSight Operations Management was easy."
"Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it."
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"We can verify uptimes as another source of keeping devices in compliance."
"The most valuable features are the rich reports, high performance, and the look and feel of the WebEx webpage are very good."
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"The ability to pull hosts together to show what processes are running, so it can be used for change management."
"Enhancing and reaching a level of detail that facilitates pinpointing and addressing issues at such a refined level within the application and database components would be helpful."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."
"The solution's monitoring feature has limitations for analyzing multiple metrics."
"They can simplify the overall complexity since you have multiple data sources in the cloud for monitoring. It's quite simple, but there are so many portals. It takes time to work with it. If they could simplify the user configuration, that would be good."
"I need connectivity with cost management."
"The process of implementation needs to be easier."
"This solution could be improved with more out-of-the-box functionalities and artificial intelligence to complete event correlation."
"We were somewhat limited in TrueSight due to some of the RBAC controls not quite being what we wanted as far as delegating out administrative privileges for implementation. But because we were able to turn requests around pretty well, that burden wasn't too heavy."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"The one piece that I would love to see is a general-purpose, configurable agent which would be a framework that you can deploy on anything, whether it be Java or anything else. It would allow you to easily deploy it on a platform that they support."
"The UI for the end users could be improved and more flexible than it is now."
"The solution's support service could be better."
"The product must provide application or service monitoring features."
"The solution is overly complex."
"I definitely would like to see more improvement in the self-diagnostics. I need to know when anything is not working or collecting, long before our customer finds it."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 48 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana, whereas BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and SCOM. See our Azure Monitor vs. BMC TrueSight Operations Management report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
