Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Microsoft and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Container Security category. Microsoft is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.9, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in Container Security, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Read 40 Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) reviews

2,371 Views
806 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

992 Views
179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) are two distinct offerings in network visibility and cloud container orchestration. AKS appears to have the upper hand due to its integration with Azure's ecosystem and broader functionality, offering superior value to users.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 provides real-time network visibility, advanced threat detection, and comprehensive security analytics with an intuitive dashboard for in-depth incident insights. AKS features seamless integration into the Azure ecosystem, robust container orchestration, automated updates, and scalability, making it pivotal for large, distributed systems.

Room for Improvement: Users of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 suggest enhancements in cloud service integration and more granular customization options. Feedback for AKS highlights a need for improved documentation, better out-of-the-box security features, and a more intuitive learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers straightforward on-premises and cloud deployment models with efficient and supportive customer service. AKS provides streamlined Kubernetes cluster setups with Azure convenience but can pose challenges for newcomers. Azure's customer support receives mixed reviews with some users pointing to a steep onboarding process.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360’s pricing can be a concern for smaller enterprises, but users recognize substantial ROI through enhanced security and network performance. AKS offers competitive pricing with Azure’s pay-as-you-go model, which users find economical for scaling operations. Despite some initial setup costs, AKS users see favorable ROI due to long-term operational efficiencies provided by Azure integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Ranking in Container Security

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Container Security

30th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (19th), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is 0.7%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Shaijith KB

Senior System Specialist at General Directorate of Residence and Foreigners Affairs (GDRFA)

Professional services boost confidence but pricing and user-friendliness need attention

We have multiple solutions such as SimpliVity, Nutanix, and DXRail, which are all part of our Ansible-based system. It gives us more confidence and we can control our groups effectively. The solution is not particularly user-friendly for novice administrators, making it challenging to understand certain aspects. Templates are not readily available, requiring users to build their own worksheets and everything from scratch. This is a main decentralization we observe compared to VMware. We have tested various solutions including Rancher, RHEL, Canonical from SUSE, and the bare metal version from RHEL direct. Since pricing is not a major concern, we chose the best fit for our application, which was specifically designed for this particular platform.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the autoscaling and self-healing."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the diagnostic service."

"Compliance is easy right out-of-the-box with integration to Azure Security, Azure Active Directory, and Azure Policies."

"AKS as a service is very good when you need to leverage applications or functions with much variability in their usage because you're trying to be as efficient as you can with resources."

"I don't have to furnish my own infrastructure in order to run containers or Kubernetes."

"It is a stable solution."

"The product has built-in functionality that checks whether the service is available or not. In case the service is down, the tool will create a new instance by default. Hence, the web API will be always up irrespective of the server or the situation."

"The most valuable features of AKS are scalability, deployability, and automation."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

Cons

"The technical support could be faster."

"The solution should improve its UI and cost."

"Unfortunately, when a microservice fails, Azure can take up to 60 seconds to broadcast an alert to the monitoring agents."

"There are a lot of features that should be included with the AKS."

"It would be nice if they could handle the management of personal information more efficiently."

"The initial setup of AKS is complicated. The setup depends on the cluster, nodes, and lots of other things. There are also lots of extremely critical small devices. Moreover, you will have to pay them even while setting up the solution. It is not like you setup first and then pay for it."

"If any customer uses a traditional code, the code-level changes take a lot of time."

"One area that could be improved is the Azure CLI. It would be beneficial if they could abstract some of the complexities related to deployment scripts and make them a part of Azure CLI."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cons

"There needs to be more support."

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is expensive."

"I like the pricing and find it to be in the mid-range, and I would rate it as five out of ten."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"It is not expensive."

"The control plane is free and we only pay for the usage and time."

"The product follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model which is good for small enterprises. You need to pay only for the services that you use."

"The pricing of the solution is same as Azure Stack."

"The product is expensive in terms of scalability."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

Could you please tell what areas of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) you think could be improved or enhanced? It doesn't necessarily have to be something advanced. Perhaps there are some minor things...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

Could you please describe your customers' usual use cases for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

See all answers

What do you like most about ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

I recommend prioritizing demos over POCs when engaging with vendors. Organizing POCs involves significant time and resource investments for both parties. Instead, invest time in multiple demo sessi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 67% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 9% of the time

SUSE Rancher vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 5% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 24% of the time

Corelight vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 15% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 14% of the time

Darktrace vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 13% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

August 2025

Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

July 2025

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

Cloud is where your business operates, where it innovates, how it enables employees, and how it connects with customers. Adversaries know this, and that's why attacks against cloud assets in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS environments are increasing. With Reveal(x) 360, you can mitigate the blast radius of advanced threats like ransomware and supply chain attacks with unified security across multicloud and hybrid environments in a single management pane.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.