AWS Step Functions vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.9, while OpenText is ranked #45. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

AWS Step Functions

Read 14 AWS Step Functions reviews

2,556 Views
1,891 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

721 Views
454 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Step Functions

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText ProVision and AWS Step Functions compete in business process management and orchestrating serverless workflows. AWS Step Functions often holds the upper hand due to its robust features, even at a higher cost.

Features: OpenText ProVision provides process analysis, strategic alignment, and business insight. AWS Step Functions offers flexible serverless orchestration, manages complex workflows, and supports workflow scalability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Step Functions simplifies deployment with its scalable, serverless solutions and integrates with AWS services. OpenText ProVision supports on-premise deployment suitable for businesses seeking more control. AWS provides extensive support through its cloud ecosystem, while OpenText may require personalized services due to customization options.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ProVision lowers setup costs, allowing cost-effective implementation for process improvement-focused businesses. AWS Step Functions involves higher initial investment but offers significant returns with its advanced features and scalability, ideal for agile operations.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Step Functions

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (10th)

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

45th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AWS Step Functions is 1.7%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Step Functions	1.7%
OpenText ProVision	0.6%
Other	97.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2706945

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Orchestration and integration simplify processes with seamless stability and reliability

I use the Visual Workflow Editor feature of AWS Step Functions. I mainly work through code and then improve it through the visual aspect. There are two ways to do orchestration: through code and through visual. My main task is to develop flows. I have only implemented AWS Step Functions with AWS services, not with any third-party tools. The integration between AWS Step Functions and other AWS services is excellent, working seamlessly with EventBridge, Glue jobs, and databases. I have not encountered any challenges with customers regarding AWS Step Functions that needed me to find a workaround. The pricing of AWS Step Functions is moderate and not particularly costly. AWS Step Functions is affordable for small, medium, and enterprise businesses as an orchestration tool. I have not used any documentation, manuals, or guides for AWS Step Functions as it's very simple to implement. When help is needed, I consult Stack Overflow or AI for commands. Overall rating for AWS Step Functions: 9 out of 10.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky."

"One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature."

"It is a scalable solution."

"AWS Step Functions was stable, and there were no problems that I can recall."

"The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale."

"It's Amazon, it's scalable."

"It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface."

"The number of historical events is great."

More AWS Step Functions pros

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The stability of the product is very good."

Cons

"I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic."

"It is difficult to suggest improvements at the moment."

"The solution's data size limit can be improved."

"There is room for improvement in terms of integration with other products. It would benefit from more integration with different applications or services."

"Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good."

"The solution's pricing could be cheaper. It is cheaper than Airflow."

"It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency."

"The pricing of the solution can be improved."

More AWS Step Functions cons

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"The solution is expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Step Functions?

The integration capability is easy, whereas building state machines is tricky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Step Functions?

My customer's usual use cases for AWS Step Functions that I've been working with include orchestration, flows, diagram creation, and creating a flow for multiple Glue jobs to run a single pipeline.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Amazon Step Functions?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 29% of the time

Control-M vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Pega Platform vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs AWS Step Functions

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Step Functions Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 21% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 16% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Rational System Architect vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 13% of the time

LeanIX vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions

January 2026

Download AWS Step Functions product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

AWS Step Functions integrate seamlessly with other AWS services to offer efficient pipeline and workflow management. Its intuitive design allows for streamlined orchestration, easily handling complex tasks.

AWS Step Functions provide robust orchestration and automation capabilities, simplifying the creation of workflows with graphical and JSON-based designs. It excels in managing tasks through advanced parallelization and error handling features. Automatic scaling further enhances performance, ensuring reliability in varied environments. However, improvements are needed in IDE integration, larger data handling, and fault tolerance. Users find value in its capacity for microservice orchestration and data integration, although dependency on the Amazon ecosystem and limited third-party integrations pose challenges.

What are the key features of AWS Step Functions?

Integration with AWS Services: Facilitates seamless coordination with AWS offerings like Lambda and Glue.
Graphical and JSON-Based Design: User-friendly interfaces simplify workflow design and management.
Advanced Orchestration: Efficiently manages task execution with parallelization and error handling.
Automatic Scaling: Ensures optimal performance by adjusting resources as needed.
Microservice Integration: Supports smooth microservice communication and operation.

What benefits should organizations assess when considering AWS Step Functions?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates and streamlines task execution across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to workloads, providing flexibility in resource management.
Improved Workflow Management: Facilitates reliable and error-free operations.
Visualization and Automation: Simplifies complex processes with visual tools.
Data Validation and Script Execution: Integrates data operations smoothly within data lakes.

In industries managing data pipelines, AWS Step Functions orchestrate workflows, execute parallel ETL jobs, and integrate various AWS services, enabling smoother operations and efficient data migration. Companies benefit from streamlined processes and robust handling of interdependent tasks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision

December 2025

Free Report: AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Step Functions vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.