Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS IAM Identity Center vs ClassLink LaunchPad comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS IAM Identity Center
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (7th)
ClassLink LaunchPad
Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)
35th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of AWS IAM Identity Center is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ClassLink LaunchPad is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Single Sign-On (SSO)
 

Featured Reviews

Khaled Saidi - PeerSpot reviewer
Manage cloud security with granular access control and enhanced authentication
Managing IAM in complex environments can be challenging, and there are several areas for improvement. First, incorporating automation tools or a centralized dashboard for managing roles and policies across multiple accounts would simplify administration, especially for large organizations. Additionally, policy debugging and validation could be more streamlined, as troubleshooting misconfigurations can be time-consuming and prone to errors. A more robust error messaging system or a dedicated debugging tool would be beneficial. Another area for improvement is temporary access credentials. AWS documentation should offer more detailed guidance on edge cases and exceptions, along with clearer examples of how to handle various scenarios. Lastly, enhanced session-level policies that are more context-sensitive and based on specific conditions (such as IP address, device, or time) would greatly increase flexibility and allow for more granular control over user sessions.
Use ClassLink LaunchPad?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.
863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Performing Arts
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS IAM Identity Center?
The product is easy for beginners to learn and use.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS IAM Identity Center?
AWS provides the lowest pricing among other service providers like Azure, Google, Oracle. It is cost-effective, and they use a pay-as-you-go model.
What needs improvement with AWS IAM Identity Center?
There are new AI features coming to AWS that are easy and simple to use. However, focusing on further allowing customization and flexibility in developing solutions as a solution architect or devel...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

AWS Single Sign On, AWS SSO
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
1. Acme Corporation 2. Amazon 3. Apple Inc 4. ATT 5. Bank of America 6. Berkshire Hathaway 7. Citigroup 8. Coca-Cola Company 9. Dell Technologies 10. Disney 11. eBay 12. ExxonMobil 13. FedEx 14. Ford Motor Company 15. General Electric 16. Google 17. Home Depot 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. JPMorgan Chase 21. Kraft Heinz 22. McDonalds 23. Merck Co 24. Microsoft 25. Nike 26. Oracle 27. PepsiCo 28. Procter & Gamble 29. Starbucks 30. Tesla 31. United Health Group 32. Visa
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO). Updated: July 2025.
863,429 professionals have used our research since 2012.