AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 92% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 25 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

6,916 Views
3,804 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Quest Rapid Recovery EOL and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery compete in the disaster recovery and data protection market. AWS seems to have the upper hand due to its superior cloud integration and flexibility, despite Rapid Recovery's ease of use and robust features.

Features: Quest Rapid Recovery provides granular recovery points, customizable backup schedules, and robust snapshot and replication capabilities. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery integrates seamlessly with AWS services, supports automated recovery processes, and manages infrastructure concerns effortlessly.

Room for Improvement: Quest Rapid Recovery needs to enhance GUI response time, improve tech support speed, and expand tape backup and outdated system support. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery users seek better automation, improved logging, and an intuitive failback process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Rapid Recovery benefits from on-premises deployment utilizing existing infrastructure, with generally prompt customer service but variable support effectiveness. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery supports hybrid and public cloud deployments and enjoys a good reputation for customer service, though onboarding could improve.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Rapid Recovery faces concerns over high licensing costs but provides perpetual licensing options. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery's pay-as-you-go model can be costly, yet its deployment flexibility is valued. Both solutions emphasize strong data protection as a worthwhile investment despite costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,801 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (8th), Cloud Backup (9th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (9th)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Kavya S

Data Engineer at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Continuous replication has protected critical servers and supports seamless disaster recovery drills

Some features that I personally feel can be improved are more simplified monitoring and reporting. As I previously mentioned, the console shows the replication status. If it had more detailed dashboards or built-in reports for DR readiness, it would make it easier for the teams to track everything in one place. Another improvement would be cost visibility and optimization guidance in optimizing the cost and also giving us visibility of it. Because the staging resources and replication storage are running continuously, it would be very helpful for organizations and users if AWS provided clearer cost insights, recommendations, and remediations to optimize the DR environment. It would also be useful if AWS added more automation options for application-level recovery, such as easier ways to handle IP changes, domain name system (DNS) updates, or application dependencies during failover. Additionally, we can simplify the setup and configuration process. For someone new to the service, understanding the staging settings, launch templates, and networking configurations can take some time. Setup simplicity and more detailed monitoring and alerting features would be beneficial. If we could add that, we can easily track the replication health, lag, and potential issues. Instead of relying on other additional tools for monitoring and alerting features, we can rely on AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery itself.

Read full review

Ujwal Sawant

Technical Manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd

Reliable and efficient for our data backup needs

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as an eight out of ten. During our initial setup of Quest Rapid Recovery, we encountered some smaller issues, mainly related to version compatibility and system changes. Setting up Quest Rapid Recovery was quick and done within a day. We started by ensuring the required prerequisites were in place. One server was dedicated to Rapid Recovery, and another acted as a proxy for communication. After installing the Rapid Recovery client on both servers and establishing communication, we configured settings and set up a backup schedule, deciding on file-level or full backups as needed. The process was straightforward, making the deployment efficient and completed within a day. One person with the right skills is all it takes for the deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The strong points are the stability and scalability of the solution, as well as the convenience of it being cloud-based."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is a reliable and cost-effective solution for business continuity."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."

"There has definitely been a lot of improvements in recovery time with very less downtime because we already understand how to recover using the clear process that AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides."

"The solution's cost is reasonable."

"The ability to replicate our database and our data from one cloud to another is the most valuable feature."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

"It is pretty simple to set up and use, the ease of use has reduced the administration time involved in our backup and recovery operations, and I can sleep easily at night knowing that I've got one of the best solutions in place for the school."

"One feature I found that's the most valuable in Quest Rapid Recovery is the VM standby feature which is very useful for my current customer. The solution also has a great replication feature. The third most valuable feature in Quest Rapid Recovery is the five-minute RPO and the fifteen-minute RTO. The solution is also very user-friendly."

"It is very easy to use, and it saves hours on each restore."

"Definitely, the mount and recovery points are the most valuable, because if someone deletes a file or something, or if something gets corrupted, we can always revert back to an old change because our repository goes about a month back. The ability to roll back files and the ability to roll back servers is really important."

"Basically, half of my day is saved because of the email notification and alerts."

"Disk backup (archiving to the cloud) is its most valuable feature because it provides for our disaster recovery plan."

"The fact that it can take a snapshot of everything on a server and replicate it on another server in real-time is the most valuable feature."

"Quick and easy backups for all of my servers."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

Cons

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved."

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

"The initial setup was complex rather than straightforward. It became more complex in several ways."

"While the service is very effective, it could improve in areas such as more granular cost visibility during staging and test launches."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is stable, but it can be improved."

"However, the user interface and monitoring features could be improved to make the overall experience better."

"The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

"The initial setup can be tricky, and if not done right, the whole solution needs to be reinstalled."

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"There could be better space management for incremental data. When you use incremental data, the space in the appliance keeps on going up. There should be a better way to manage the space. You have to manage the incremental data to reduce the time."

"When you do a full backup, all of the memory resources on the server are used, which is something that should be improved."

"It is quite surprising to me that the configuration cannot be backed up automatically, and I think that Rapid Recovery should have an option for scheduled configuration backup."

"One area where Quest Rapid Recovery has room for improvement is in the handling of snapshots on Hyper-V."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support. I would like to see faster response time."

"I think the self-paced learning and knowledge base can always be improved so that users can self-service without having to contact either a reseller or Quest. I know there are things that I would have been looking for to try and solve. And the only way I could get there was to actually open a ticket rather than go through self-service through the portal."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

"I rate the price of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery a six out of ten."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,801 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

16%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The cost rating was assessed on a scale where 10 represented the most expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

There are areas that could be improved beyond the downtime issues mentioned, and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could enhance several aspects of its functionality.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

This was for the school.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 5% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

September 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

August 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Also Known As

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Dell AppAssure

Overview

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,801 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.