Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 comparison

Auvik and ExtraHop Networks are both solutions in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category. Auvik is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while ExtraHop Networks is ranked #13. Auvik holds a 4.5% mindshare in NTA, compared to ExtraHop Networks’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Auvik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ExtraHop Networks users who would recommend it.

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Read 208 Auvik Network Management (ANM) reviews

16,097 Views
1,610 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Read 3 ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 reviews

2,300 Views
552 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and Auvik Network Management are network management solutions with distinct strengths. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 seems to have the upper hand due to higher customer satisfaction and support ratings.

Features:ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 users highlight comprehensive threat detection, real-time visibility, and advanced detection capabilities. Auvik Network Management is praised for its automated network discovery, detailed network topology mapping, and robust reporting.

Room for Improvement:ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 users suggest improvements in documentation, onboarding processes, and user interface. Auvik Network Management users indicate a need for better reporting features, more granular configuration options, and streamlined user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is noted for its straightforward deployment and highly responsive customer support. Auvik Network Management's deployment can be complex for some users, though their support team is also well-regarded.

Pricing and ROI:ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 users find the pricing reasonable with strong ROI. Auvik Network Management is perceived as more expensive, with mixed reviews on ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

208

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (2nd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (4th)

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Ranking in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (23rd), Container Security (52nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (41st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 4.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is 3.5%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Auvik Network Management (ANM)	4.5%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360	3.5%
Other	92.0%

Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)

Featured Reviews

Wahaj Memon

System Engineer Tier 4

Real-time alerting enhances network monitoring, but interface and network mapping need improvement

The interface is good yet could be improved. There are many elements that could be changed in the interface itself. There should be some sort of chart or alerting within the dashboard. In the overview section, these features are currently absent. When you get an alert, you must go to notifications, then within the device to identify the issue. It would be beneficial if everything was visible immediately upon logging in to the overview, such as machine performance and other metrics. Regarding the network map and visibility, there are some issues. Many people have mentioned that the network map needs improvement, especially when handling numerous items. Currently, I have everything in place: printers, monitors, laptops, switches, and access points. However, I have three switches showing outside of the loop without explanation. This issue is persistent, not occasional. These switches appear disconnected in the corner, even though they are connected and online according to other platforms. The presentation aspect needs significant improvement. We have government-related clients, and taking a screenshot of the current network mapping to send to them appears unprofessional. Although Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides network mapping, I still need to create my own network diagram to make it presentable for clients.

Read full review

Maksym Toporkov

Head of Research And Development at Quipu GmbH

A competitive choice for network detection and response with exceptional user interface, ease of implementation and minimal false positives

The NDR feature analyzes network traffic, creating records with connection details. While these records offer insights, there's a limitation in investigating payloads directly. ExtraHop provides an option for an additional server to save payloads, but its temporary storage has constraints. Unlike some competitors, it lacks an automatic payload-saving feature for each detection, presenting an improvement opportunity. Suggested enhancement involves the main sensor prompting payload storage for specific detections, streamlining the investigation process, and contributing to a more efficient workflow. A drawback includes packet storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best aspect of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the user experience and how it is displayed on the screen with categorization of basic things where everything is easily available."

"A simple site view with the associated devices populating as things to add to or remove from the network is valuable. It's also nice to have it integrated with our ticketing system to create tickets in certain cases for devices that go down or have some high-level alerts, such as high CPU or overtemperature."

"The other element that it's helped us with is in predicting the future. And another thing that it allows us to do very easily is to track our bandwidth usage that's going in and out of each of the data centers. We've been able to use that information to trend and predict when we need to get upgrades in place. Funny enough, we have an order now where we're increasing our connectivity at one of our data centers tenfold and that's being driven because Auvik's enabled us to understand that we're rapidly approaching our threshold."

"Auvik Network Management (ANM) provides complete global visibility and has a centralized dashboard—working in India, I can monitor the entire North American network and take charge if anything goes wrong."

"And the visibility into remote and distributed networks globally was one of the reasons we moved to Auvik."

"The monitoring and alerting are the most valuable features."

"It works superbly. It has made my job a lot easier. It made me understand networks so much better and more quickly too."

"The switch backups are great. If a switch goes down or gets fried, we can just plug in a new switch and be good to go."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pros

"It stands out for its intuitive and efficient user interface, robust detection capabilities with minimal false positives, and the ability to handle encrypted traffic, making it a valuable asset for network security and management."

"It is scalable."

"It is very easy to collect and handle data in ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud. Integration with Big Data is also easy. Many of our customers integrate it with Big Data platforms like Splunk or Elastic. It is also easy to handle and easy to understand."

"Their technical support is more effective and of better quality than other competitors."

Cons

"I'd probably like a little bit more mapping functionality. It gives me a visual overlay of the way that one network segment links to another, but I can't adjust it. Everything is at an equal distance, which makes sense, but I'd probably group some of the things closer and further as it reflects in reality, but I can't do that right now on their system."

"In terms of the dashboard, maybe seeing on the map, for example, if you have an access point that's connected to switch one, and the access point you do not have credentials for, that could help us make management a bit easier."

"I would like to see Auvik have some more documentation with a typical CM solution like Splunk. I want to see more examples of things like configuring port forwarding for firewalls. In addition to collecting data from different types of appliances, I would like to customize more of the metrics for each appliance."

"I would like Auvik to alert on IP conflicts."

"Although the network topology is excellent, it has a hard time picking up some devices on the network. A device might not be fully supported, or Auvik is unable to pull all the information from it."

"The reporting needs a little bit of improvement. Sometimes, I get too many reports, or I don't get reports when I should be getting reports."

"The only area that I dislike about the solution is the lack of exportability."

"Some of the discovery methodologies could be improved upon. It removes the device that is offline, but when that gets added back, if there is any custom information saved for that device, such as it's a smartphone, you have to change and reenter the information all over again. It would be nice to not have to manually modify certain devices that get added to the network."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) cons

"A drawback includes bucket storage limitations for payload data, necessitating timely extraction for thorough investigations."

"Their professional service can be improved."

"They can include integration with SAP. Currently, no vendor provides network performance monitoring in the SAP market. It is a very big market. We have around 400 customers for SAP in Korea. In the USA, there are more than 10,000 customers."

"There needs to be more support."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have any insight into the cost, as another department handles that."

"I would like it to be more cost-effective or affordable. It's not the most expensive one, but it's also not the cheapest solution out there. You pay month to month. It is what it is. It is not for everyone, but it depends on what you're looking for in your budget."

"The value is there. It's not that expensive per device and it's licensed per device. Unlike some of the other tools that I use, it's not real expensive. It's a good value for the price."

"The pricing could be tiered so that you get a discount for more devices. We're fairly early on in the billing process, but it could be slightly cheaper."

"Its pricing is very reasonable. We had looked at other solutions where you pay based on the amount of traffic that was filtered through and analyzed. With Auvik, we pay by a billable device. We're not paying based on every single device we have. For one of the locations I have, one network element would likely be a billable device. So, every billable device has a network element, but not every network element is a billable device. If I have a location that has 50 network elements, then maybe 30 of them are billable devices. PCs, VoIP phones, and access points are monitored at no charge."

"I do not have a whole lot of information on the pricing, but our pricing seems to be okay. Internally, we have not had any issues with it, so we have not had the need to discuss pricing."

"I would love to be able to get into the tier with the sys logging and the NetFlow/sFlow. That tier is a little bit expensive for us. If that could come down a little bit in price, we would be using that everywhere."

"Pricing for Auvik Network Management is genuine. I would categorize its pricing as good."

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing and cost advice

"When compared to other solutions, it aligns with the market average, indicating a competitive pricing level."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	146
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	23

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?

Auvik Network Management (ANM) is not costly, but pricing is based on how many licenses are taken, and that can be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auvik?

One improvement that would be really beneficial for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is the ability to get alerts sent to me via text. Right now, the only alerts I can get are via email. Receiving al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Auvik?

My main use case for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is managing our overall network and being able to have insight into all of the devices, switches, servers, firewalls, and access points on the ne...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Kentik vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

Wireshark vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)

Compared 4% of the time

More Auvik Network Management (ANM) Competitors

Vectra AI vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

NetWitness NDR vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

Wiz vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Compared 6% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM)

May 2026

Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) product report

Buyer's Guide

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

May 2026

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud, Reveal(X) Cloud

Overview

Auvik Network Management offers competitive pricing for essential network and infrastructure device management, providing robust features valued by enterprises.

Auvik Network Management delivers comprehensive network visibility and management through intuitive auditing, alerting, and discovery functionalities. It eases troubleshooting, automates configuration backups, and includes a user-friendly interface for effective monitoring and management. With real-time alerts and customizable notifications, IT operations are streamlined, while remote access capabilities enhance time efficiency. ANM supports integration with other platforms, effectively maintaining device inventories and visualizing network topology.

What are the key features of Auvik Network Management?

Auditing: Offers comprehensive network audits, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
Network Discovery: Simplifies the process of identifying network components.
Alerting Modules: Provides real-time alerts and customizable notifications.
Configuration Backups: Automates backups, safeguarding configurations.
Remote Access: Streamlines network management from any location.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Auvik Network Management?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Offers detailed insights into network operations.
Time Efficiency: Remote access and automated features save valuable time.
Proactive Issue Identification: Real-time monitoring aids in identifying issues quickly.
Integration Support: Works cohesively with other platforms, easing management.
Operational Efficiency: Automates management tasks for improved productivity.

In industries such as IT management and network administration, Auvik Network Management is predominantly utilized for overseeing and maintaining network infrastructures across multiple locations. It offers capabilities for monitoring network topology, receiving alerts on device downtimes, and managing performance metrics. Users employ its features for proactive issue identification, and auditing, helping maintain oversight of networks containing switches, routers, and firewalls. Auvik provides remote access and automated backups, which contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and network visibility.

Auvik

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offers advanced network detection and response capabilities, designed to provide real-time situational awareness and threat detection across hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

Built to meet the demands of modern enterprises, ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 enhances visibility into network activities, delivering comprehensive security insights. It uses high-speed data analysis to identify anomalous behaviors and potential threats, helping security teams respond effectively. With centralized visibility, it ensures quick detection and thorough investigation of threats within complex infrastructures, including cloud, edge, and on-premises environments.

What key features does ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 offer?

Real-Time Threat Detection: Monitors network traffic in real-time for immediate threat identification.
Centralized Visibility: Offers a unified dashboard for observing activities across diverse environments.
Automated Response: Enables predefined actions to mitigate threats swiftly without manual intervention.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools for enhanced incident management.
Advanced Analytics: Utilizes machine learning to detect sophisticated threats promptly.

What benefits should users look for in reviews of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360?

Improved Security Posture: Evidence of enhanced organizational security through faster threat detection and response.
Operational Efficiency: Reduction in time and effort for IT teams due to automated processes.
Scalability: Flexibility to expand with organizational growth and technology changes.
Cost-Effectiveness: Attractive pricing compared to functionality and outcomes offered.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 is implemented across industries such as financial services, healthcare, and retail, where robust security measures are paramount. In these sectors, the capabilities of ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 align with the need for secure handling of sensitive data and compliance with industry regulations, providing valuable protection and detection capabilities.

ExtraHop Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Wizards of the Coast

Buyer's Guide

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

April 2026

Free Report: Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360

Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. ExtraHop Reveal(x) 360 report.

See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.

We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.