AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] comparison

The compared Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and AutoSys Workload Automation solutions aren't in the same category. AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked #5 in WA , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 9.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of AutoSys Workload Automation users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 13 Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] reviews

86% willing to recommend

AutoSys Workload Automation

Read 84 AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

6,298 Views
5,542 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

AutoSys Workload Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] and AutoSys Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AutoSys Workload Automation

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Workload Automation (5th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer895359

Principal Project Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Automatic installation for complex deployments and environments, with good workflow support

I like that really complex deployments are possible with it. It's very good. You have everything you need. You can design your workflows for your needs. You can do so much more, it's not just an automatic installation tool. It's a real deployment tool. I can do the complete deployment with everything that is possible.

Read full review

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have saved on our time costs and have seen more quality."

"Gives people insight into what's happening during the deployment."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to see which problems have been resolved from deployment."

"It is an umbrella system that allows us to integrate many different systems into our heterogeneous environment."

"The IT process automation is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Self-service for developers, because they are able to deploy to development departments on their own, without needing people from operations."

"Deployment workflow (WF) can be designed this way, so that it is not necessary to provide all applications (systems) artifacts of which an application consists."

"The metrics gathered after deployment, for example, the rate of success versus the rate of failure."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] pros

"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."

"Easy configuration and integration with SAP."

"We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin."

"I prefer AutoSys over the other ones out there for ease of use, ease of understanding, and getting people to understand how the tool works."

"We get better reports than we use to have."

"The benefits I have seen from AutoSys Workload Automation are significant; I would say it is about ease of administration."

"The initial setup is easy."

"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pros

Cons

"There is an issue with the stability in the tool. The process of agent will stop, then the monitoring agent can't be recognized because the process is running, but you can talk with the system."

"It would be very beneficial for us to see integrations into cloud environments, especially into the Google Cloud environment because we are heading towards cloud."

"The stability of the solution can be improved."

"One of the biggest features I've been asked by my team to put in there is opening more scripting languages to be part of the platform. There is a little bit of a learning curve in learning how to code some of the workflows in Automic at this time. If widely used languages like Perl and Python were integrated, on top of what's already there, the proprietary language, it would make it easier to on-board new resources."

"The dashboard should allow you to see the current state of packages in each environment, not only on an individual application basis, but across the entire application platform."

"There needs to be better error handling and error descriptions. It should be more clear what the errors are and what we can do to fix them."

"At the moment, the version that we are using (version 12.0), the environment is complex with multiple installations. Therefore, the monitoring is not scalable, but this should be improved in 12.1 and 12.2."

"If you have a technical problem and need development of the tool, the support team is terrible, because they cannot help with the technical details."

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] cons

"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."

"It would be helpful to be able to monitor and manage workload windows so we could minimize downstream applications. This would allow us easier access to the applications."

"CA Workload Automation is not part of CA's strategic vision going forward."

"I would like to see two-factor authentication, since you see a lot of companies in the news for security breaches. That is a really big thing for us."

"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."

"Reduce the number of operational files. This would make the job of a system programmer supporting ESP easier."

"It lacks support and integration with cloud computing platforms."

"The cross-platform arena, where you can run work on multiple platforms, needs improvement."

More AutoSys Workload Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We increased our quality and reduced our time costs."

"If you have a fixed contract, it has limits to spreading out. If you have a flexible enterprise license contract, then you have a lot of scalability for this tool."

"Customers often complain about the price."

"I can save time and money more quickly."

"CA pricing has been a problem, and not looked upon favorably here at all."

"People need to pay attention to how they use their ESP agents on the distributed platform. That's where some of the cost comes in, based on how many you need or how many you use."

"I certainly think the pricing is worth the value."

"The pricing needs to be improved. Some of my client's complained that it was too expensive."

"It is overpriced."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and there is an annual license required."

"There is an annual license to use AutoSys Workload Automation."

"We paid to use the solution monthly."

More AutoSys Workload Automation pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

45%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	77

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about AutoSys Workload Automation?

The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AutoSys Workload Automation?

It is reasonably priced compared to the market.

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 44% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 33% of the time

Chef vs Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] Competitors

Control-M vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 29% of the time

Automic Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs AutoSys Workload Automation

Compared 6% of the time

More AutoSys Workload Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL]

November 2025

Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Automation [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

November 2025

Download AutoSys Workload Automation product report

Also Known As

CA Continuous Delivery Automation, Automic Release Automation, Automic ONE Automation, UC4 Automation Platform

CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE

Overview

Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.

Today, the pressure is on to transform how you deliver applications to market. Get release agility and speed without compromising quality and stability with CA Continuous Delivery Automation. Deliver apps reliably on demand from development through production—mobile to mainframe. Agilely scale as the cadence, volume and complexity of your apps grow. It’s DevOps-ready release management and automation for your dynamic enterprise.

Broadcom

AutoSys Workload Automation efficiently manages complex workloads across platforms, offering high availability and seamless platform integration. Its reliability and scalability are valued for enterprise-level automation, enhancing job management and reducing manual effort with robust scheduling and advanced security.

AutoSys Workload Automation is known for its user-friendly capabilities, effectively handling cross-platform job scheduling with mainframe integration. It supports high availability, ensuring reliable performance for critical operations. Despite enhancements needed in its GUI and integration capabilities, AutoSys remains effective for batch processing, file transfers, ETL, and managing dependencies across servers and applications. Improvements are suggested for deployment complexity and monitoring features. More effective licensing and scalability solutions, along with modern subscription models and cloud integration, could address cost and automation barriers.

What are AutoSys Workload Automation's key features?

Robust Scheduling: Automates job scheduling across multiple platforms efficiently.
Advanced Security: Ensures secure management of workloads.
High Availability: Maintains performance during critical operations.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly integrates with diverse systems.
Scalability: Supports growing enterprise demands.

What benefits should users expect from AutoSys Workload Automation?

Reduced Manual Effort: Minimizes manual task management.
Enhanced Job Management: Improves oversight and control over job processes.
Flexibility in Scheduling: Offers adaptable scheduling and monitoring options.
Reliability: Consistent job execution without failures.
Security: Protects enterprise-level operations.

In industries like banking, insurance, and retail, AutoSys Workload Automation facilitates 24/7 automated job execution, ensuring smooth task automation. It allows companies to manage enterprise workloads effectively, catering to batch processing, file transfers, and handling job dependencies in a consistent manner.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

BET365, Charter Communications, TASC

Gaumont, Mercantil do Brasil, CCEE, Hanwha Life

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.