


AttackIQ and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management are key players in the cybersecurity domain. AttackIQ seems to have an advantage due to its strong focus on continuous security validation and alignment with the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
Features:AttackIQ's main features include continuous testing aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework, breach simulation, and real-time scenario testing. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management offers robust reporting, automated patching, and centralized endpoint management, supplemented by Neurons bots for proactive maintenance and reduced manual work.
Room for Improvement:AttackIQ could improve by simplifying initial setup and increasing real-time guidance for novice users, while customizable dashboards and deeper automation in remediation are also desired. Ivanti could enhance user experience and reporting, targeting improvements for new administrators, as well as simplifying initial setup and offering better documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:AttackIQ provides flexible deployment options including Public, Hybrid, and On-premises Cloud, with noted responsive and knowledgeable customer support in enterprise security. Ivanti offers similar Cloud deployment options, though users point out opportunities to enhance customer support, especially in terms of responsiveness and training resources.
Pricing and ROI:AttackIQ is priced for medium to large enterprises, providing substantial operational value and significant ROI through time savings and enhanced security validation. Ivanti's pricing is on a per-asset model, which can be costly with numerous nodes, yet deemed reasonable for its features, delivering a positive ROI through automation efficiencies.
We are able to scan all our assets with less human intervention and achieve overall effective outcomes.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
We have seen a massive return on investment with AttackIQ, specifically from a resource perspective and time spent on findings due to the fact that the accuracy of the reporting or the accuracy of the findings from AttackIQ was brilliant.
It has had a great turnaround for money saved due to the multiple applications and licensing we used before; now we only focus on this application.
The number of tickets for our IT team has drastically reduced, which saves time, increases productivity, and allows the IT team to focus on essential tasks rather than minor issues with employee devices.
We can remove or add licenses according to business requirements, and it is all controlled within the application.
The client was already paying for Microsoft Intune and was able to decommission Ivanti Neurons for UEM.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate customer support a ten.
The technical support from Qualys is excellent, always available 24/7 for any urgent needs.
The technical support team is strong and helpful in solving issues promptly.
The support team generally responsive, technically knowledgeable, and helpful during both onboarding and operational phases.
They provide what customers need and sometimes exceed expectations.
The customer support for AttackIQ is quite quick to resolve issues.
From a support perspective, they are fantastic, usually very good at getting back to us in a timely manner.
I am concerned about consistently needing to call support for installing brand new solutions.
They are responsive, stick to time, and are enthusiastic about helping.
I would rate its scalability a ten out of ten.
The scalability of Qualys TotalCloud is excellent, and I would rate it as ten out of ten.
For scalability, I would rate it a ten out of ten.
It can handle increasing workloads and more complex simulations as my needs grow without any problem.
AttackIQ scales well for enterprise-level security validation and continuous testing use cases.
AttackIQ is very scalable, and since it's SaaS-based, we don't foresee any challenges from a scalability perspective.
Transitioning from low to high capacity in seconds.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten.
There is no limitation in scalability; Ivanti Neurons for MDM is very scalable.
It has a lot of scanning mechanisms, which are agentless APIs, eBPF, and cloud agents, that are highly reliable.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for stability.
We have not encountered any lagging or crashing from the tool.
The information and verification are great.
We have not seen any downtime.
Regarding the self-healing capabilities, I would say it has reduced downtime by around thirty to forty percent.
It delivers very good UEM capabilities.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
If we find a critical or high vulnerability on an IP or server, the remediation steps should be communicated clearly.
One area for improvement is the initial configuration complexity, which is very complex in the initial stage to configure the whole thing and integrate with the SOC, presenting a learning curve for organizations that are new to adversary emulation or continuous security validation.
AttackIQ works best when a SOC already has a process for acting on findings.
I would appreciate even deeper integrations with security tools and more automated remediation recommendations to streamline follow-up actions.
It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.
In an enterprise environment, while automation is powerful, strong guardrails, approval workflows, and clear audit trails, along with rollback capabilities and the ability to control the scope of automated actions, are essential.
In Cherwell, we receive an overall average rating based on the tickets worked on, which I find missing in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management.
In our case, replacing the tool will give us better functionalities without increasing the cost compared to what we pay today for the competitor.
Qualys TotalCloud offers good pricing that is affordable and competitive with the market.
Qualys TotalCloud offers competitive pricing given its comprehensive suite of features, including integration, assessment, remediation, and detection capabilities, all within a single platform.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AttackIQ is that since I was using the free version, I did not purchase it initially and was only utilizing the platform, doing lab simulations that were free in that environment.
I tried the demo or the free version before, and the pricing was great.
AttackIQ is willing to provide a better offer.
This is not a cheap solution.
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
Pricing, setup cost, and licensing are on the high side.
The AI enhancements simplify vulnerability management by eliminating the need for SQL queries to create policies.
For example, if some machines have open vulnerabilities and the remediation team resolves them, the on-demand feature allows us to verify vulnerability resolution promptly.
Qualys TotalCloud is also used to provide unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IaaS and SaaS.
AttackIQ allows us to resolve issues much quicker because these issues come in categories, enabling us to prioritize them and fix the emergency issues first.
The continuous validation of security controls through repeatable attack simulations is a massive advantage for me.
The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.
It integrates into InTune, which enables us to detect, diagnose, and fix issues without manual intervention.
AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work.


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 39 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 35 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
AttackIQ offers a cybersecurity platform focusing on security optimization through breach and attack simulation, enabling organizations to assess and improve their defense mechanisms effectively.
Using advanced technology, AttackIQ helps organizations evaluate security processes against real-world threat scenarios. Its platform provides continuous security assessments, which help in identifying vulnerabilities before exploitation by adversaries. It allows for the strategic allocation of resources towards enhancing security through actionable insights and reporting.
What key features make AttackIQ stand out?Industries such as finance and healthcare, highly sensitive to data breaches, utilize AttackIQ for its rigorous testing capabilities. By simulating sophisticated cyber threats, organizations within these sectors can better protect critical data and maintain compliance with stringent regulatory standards.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.
What are the most important features?
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.