Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atomic ModSecurity Rules vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Atomic ModSecurity Rules
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
32nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Check Point CloudGuard WAF
Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)
14th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (10th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Atomic ModSecurity Rules?
Share your opinion
Ashish Upadhyay - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 18, 2024
Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability
There is room for improvement in the pricing strategy. By reducing their cost and extending the trial period, Check Point can attract more partnerships and customers, keeping up with other vendors in the field. It has a trial period, but they can extend it so we can better evaluate how it's working in our environment and how well it is suited. It should be converted to activate some discounts on buying standard versions. This will attract more of us, and we'll get more time to check the application and how it works. Additionally, their effort to involve IT teams would mean continuous adaptation to meet business requirements. This can help with the price picture and increasing the trial period so we can better evaluate the cost-effectiveness. Also, Check Point need to continue developing new features and arrangements in line with changing business requirements. The analysis time while it analyzes itself is very time-consuming. They need to improve the latency and minimize the steps involved. Also, the documentation needs to be updated, more improved, and simplified... so that even a beginner can start with this application. It can make things more beginner-friendly. Also, Check Point can bring some updates to the integration features with other security solutions, making it easier to integrate. For instance, it needs to integrate with solutions someone might have various firewall solutions from IBM and others, depending on which ones the business wants to integrate with.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."
"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"
"It is reasonable as compared to the other solutions."
"I find the pricing to be reasonable."
"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."
"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."
"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Comms Service Provider
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Media Company
11%
Real Estate/Law Firm
9%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Security Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?
The app control is very sensitive, and the threat detection and prevention is better than other Check Point solutions. There is a centralized management console for threat protection and self-inspe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF. I would rate the cost of Check Point CloudGuard WAF as eight out of ten, with ten being the most costly.
What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?
When I was working with the WAF platform, there were limitations, particularly concerning compliance and reporting. Managing multiple tools for different functions like WAF, firewall, CDN solutions...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Orange España, Paschoalotto
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: September 2024.
807,508 professionals have used our research since 2012.