No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Atlassian Confluence vs metaphactory comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian Confluence
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
109
Ranking in other categories
Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (2nd), Enterprise Social Software (3rd)
metaphactory
Ranking in Knowledge Management Software
36th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Knowledge Management Software category, the mindshare of Atlassian Confluence is 9.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of metaphactory is 1.0%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Knowledge Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Atlassian Confluence9.7%
metaphactory1.0%
Other89.3%
Knowledge Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

PR
GM at a real estate/law firm with 501-1,000 employees
Collaborative workspace has improved cross-team documentation and now supports structured projects
Much of the room for improvement lies not with the tool itself but with how people are using it. In many cases where we have had issues, it has been based on the lack of structure. The company using Atlassian Confluence needs to have a very clear structure for where information will be organized. As I mentioned, we have subsections that contain the same information, which makes searching problematic. When you search for a project, you suddenly get fifteen pages about the same project, which does not make sense. A lot of these issues lie with the site owner who needs to be more structured in their usage of the tool. Atlassian Confluence is used during meetings, especially during product evaluations where we work on collaborative projects. We also use it as a note dashboard for brainstorming and similar activities.
Geraud Fokou - PeerSpot reviewer
Knowledge Engineer at a educational organization with 10,001+ employees
Ontology design has streamlined product recommendations but still needs native data integration
metaphactory could be improved in terms of data integration. For now, you can design ontologies and taxonomies, but you cannot directly implement, natively, the integration of data associated with the different taxonomies, which makes the integration of mapping engines like R2RML very useful. It would be interesting if metaphactory could also integrate engines for creating inference rules, because the goal of knowledge graphs is to create inference rules, and managing inference rules as well would be interesting. Regarding metaphactory’s artificial intelligence capabilities, I would say that governance and data security is something that for me is not integrated. Overall, when I look at metaphactory, I don’t think of security; I think of integration, and while there is access management, security is something else. At the beginning, the AI features were really just tests, and the results, in terms of reliability and accuracy, were not really there yet, remaining quite tentative. Since then, I haven’t had the chance to test the AI side further. I do not have any other improvements to suggest.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The scalability is enough for our use cases. It covers all our needs."
"The solution is stable."
"Copying another page and providing an option to edit everything is valuable."
"Atlassian Confluence has helped the company a lot."
"The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"This solution allowed us to easily input details beyond just text, such as creating basic data charts to monitor team performance."
"It's relatively easy to use, and has a lot of functionality with regard to formatting wiki articles and embedding content."
"The ease of use makes it accessible for all users."
"What I like most about metaphactory's ontology and taxonomy creation interface is the direct integration between several taxonomies in the same domain."
"metaphactory is a central tool for implementing these data products. We're considering it for pharmaceutical modeling and connecting to graph databases. It's the only product our company uses with Graph DB."
 

Cons

"When editing a page with many iterations, it takes time to scroll down to the last iteration."
"The Atlassian cloud pricing model is pretty steep. Confluence should be accessible by a relatively large audience, but the pricing model prohibits this."
"Atlassian should rethink its withdrawal of the self-hosted version of the product. They only offer cloud-based service or the "datacenter-edition", which is quite expensive for small companies and private users."
"I've always found search to be buggy."
"With that, I will no longer recommend the product, as I am opposed to the cloud-first hype."
"It is not as professional as FrameMaker. Confluence is light and very convenient, but it is difficult to reuse the same content and its format is not as flexible as FrameMaker."
"You can experience slow response times, images not updated properly, sometimes unavailability messages."
"Deployment can be painful when you have to deal with different Java versions or keystores."
"For improvements, I'd like to see more maturity in the product, especially regarding enterprise vendor lock-in. The whole area isn't mature enough yet. I think it will develop over time. More competitors are coming up now. I'd like to see better integration with specific vendors who specialize in managing data products. We need more standards beyond the W3C standards from the semantic web that have been around for twenty-five years."
"At the beginning, the AI features were really just tests, and the results, in terms of reliability and accuracy, were not really there yet, remaining quite tentative."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a very expensive solution."
"To my knowledge, Atlassian Confluence had a pricing approach which is a commercial open-source solution, so that if you are a company, you had to pay an amount. This fee was not huge compared to other traditional solutions, and it was free for personal use or if you were an individual."
"Licenses are quite expensive"
"We have to pay licensing fees."
"We pay $350 a month to use the solution."
"There is an annual license."
"Pricing wise, it ends up being an expensive solution. In the beginning it's cheap, but by the time you have all the functions you need, it turns out to be expensive."
"The price of the on-premises data center version is too expensive."
"The product is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Knowledge Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Construction Company
30%
Insurance Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise27
Large Enterprise54
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian Confluence?
Money is a factor because Atlassian Confluence is not free. I need to purchase extra components when adding new projects or employees.
What needs improvement with Atlassian Confluence?
Much of the room for improvement lies not with the tool itself but with how people are using it. In many cases where we have had issues, it has been based on the lack of structure. The company usin...
What is your primary use case for Atlassian Confluence?
We are using Jira as an asset management and ticketing system along with Confluence. We have significant portions of the Atlassian system implemented. Atlassian Confluence is used as a Wiki for Jir...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Confluence
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, Skype, Microsoft, NASA, Netflix, Adobe, Bonobos, LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Notion, Atlassian, Zendesk and others in Knowledge Management Software. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.