Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Riverbed and Broadcom are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Read 10 Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 162 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

14,379 Views
12,797 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 919,809 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

162

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (28th), Container Monitoring (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer1374792

IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update

We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator. At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well. Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity. The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues. From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.

Read full review

Eduardo Gallardo

Director of Technical Part at NOS SGPS

Dashboards facilitate prompt alerts but discovery feature needs enhancement

I would recommend Broadcom DX Application Performance Management if a customer doesn't have any existing performance solution. However, ten years ago, the solution was better, and now there are many competitive options. My overall rating would be between six and seven. The product rating I would give is 6.5 out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you want to save time for problem resolution, and to address problem on your environments you should try Riverbed OPNET."

"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."

"From the experience I had with these three tools, I realized that Riverbed was superior in all aspects (performance, user experience, and features)."

"Browsermetrix, which is real-user monitoring via JS injection and linked back to TTW via cookie. It allows us to see the experience of every user hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc."

"Mean time to isolate a problem has dropped by 50-75% in each region since we've deployed the Riverbed SteelCentral suite."

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."

"I like it that one can match IPs with the application name."

"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros

"What's most valuable about this solution is that it completely monitors code-level visibility."

"It has helped to stabilize the environments and also quickly identify issues some while they are occurring and some proactively."

"The configuration and the manager tool are good features."

"The mean time to resolve has reduced dramatically since we started using CA APM Introscope."

"If you have a large web firm or a group of servers, it does a great job of aggregating performance metrics into single viewable graphs or dashboards."

"Scalability is, I think, one of the strongest points of CA APM."

"It is a very good product, but it has to fit their needs because it is mainly focused on JAVA/.NET applications, although it has agents for PHP and Node.js."

"For the most part, we run constantly without any issue at this point because of APM."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

Cons

"It's not as good as it was three years ago before meddling by an activist investor, privatization, and subsequent layoffs hurt support."

"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."

"We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end-to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network."

"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported."

"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."

"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."

"The recording mechanism for synthetic transactions could be improved as well."

"We have put in a request as an enhancement that we would like to search for items. If we're searching for a URL and we want to know was it a get or was it a post."

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons

"It should be easier to install or set everything up. "

"Application performance in terms of transactions is a bit slow and could be quicker."

"Automatic report generation needs work."

"Client user interface and user interface dashboard."

"Everything needs to be configured manually, which is pretty bad, it's not good."

"There are several areas that could be improved in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. One of the main areas is user experience monitoring, which is currently not available. Additionally, they need to develop a solution that is compatible with OpenShift 4, as their current solution only works when an agent is installed within the image, which is not possible in OpenShift 4 as it removes the agent."

"Needs custom dashboards."

"The UI still feels a little outdated (though there is change) especially for Dashboards."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"Dynatrace is the most expensive of these tools followed by AppDynamics which is "medium-expensive." CA APM is a bit lower in price than either Dynatrace or AppDynanics... In my opinion, if you can afford it, go for AppDynamics instead of CA APM."

"There is some research needed to determine licensing costs, based on the number of DataPower instances for the Nastel agent, for example."

"Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth it"

"Pricing and licensing are not issues."

"It is definitely expensive for what we get, but there isn't an alternate option at the moment."

"The license for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is annual. The licensing model could improve because there is not any limit to deploying the agent, there should be some limits on it."

"On pricing, CA is very competitive. I think that's going to help in the long run."

"The licensing costs are expensive."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Performing Arts

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	27
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	122

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The initial pricing is reasonable and competitive compared to other solutions. The challenge arises during annual renewals, as the price increase can be significant, around twenty percent or more, ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The first area for improvement is the discovery feature, which should be enhanced to collect comprehensive information from applications and services. This includes using agents or scripts to gathe...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Our primary use case involves having a large dashboard with significant information for alerts, alarms, and metrics to summarize the state of critical businesses and applications. When an issue ari...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 16% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors

Splunk AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 3% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

October 2026

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers proactive alerting, transaction tracing, and root cause analysis. It enhances end-user experience management through efficient dashboards and customizable reporting, extending monitoring over Java and .NET applications.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management delivers comprehensive monitoring and performance insights across cloud and Java applications. It proactively addresses issues with tools like Introscope for rapid error identification and Customer Experience Manager for end-user management. The software's dashboards consolidate performance data in real-time, helping organizations enhance debugging and incident management. Its low overhead and integration with service tools make it well-suited for production environments. However, it faces potential improvements in areas such as UI updates, agent management, automation, and seamless integration with new technologies.

What are the standout features?

Proactive Alerting: Identifies issues before they impact users.
Deep-Dive Transaction Tracing: Offers comprehensive tracking of transactions for detailed analysis.
Root Cause Analysis: Expedites problem-solving by pinpointing issues quickly.
Introscope: Facilitates rapid error detection and resolution.
Customer Experience Manager: Enhances management of user experiences effectively.
Real-Time Insights: Provides immediate views of performance data through interactive dashboards.
Customizable Reporting: Offers tailored report options for specific business needs.
Java and .NET Monitoring: Supports a range of applications, enhancing troubleshooting efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Issue Resolution Speed: Quick problem identification reduces downtime.
Performance Optimization: Enhances application efficiency, reducing costs.
Cost Reduction: Improves resource use and operational costs.
Dashboard Efficiency: Real-time, consolidated data offers transparency.

Organizations in logistics, banking, and e-commerce implement Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to monitor performance across crucial environments. Their usage involves enhancing performance, debugging, and proactive incident management for cloud and Java apps, with management dashboards supporting greater transparency in crash analytics and server health checks, ultimately improving user experience.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.