Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Correlsense SharePath
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (71st)
 

Featured Reviews

PJ
Security & Performance Analytics Technical Specialist at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Points out the relevant problems in the enterprise and it's easy to understand
The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it…
it_user394539 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Capacity and Performance Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications. It's hugely configurable in terms of how the data is presented and categorized. It's reliable, with low administration overheads once up and running It provides customer insight and behaviour. It's improved our…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"From the experience I had with these three tools, I realized that Riverbed was superior in all aspects (performance, user experience, and features)."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."
"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."
"By going to v10 it made our lives a whole lot easier because prior to v10, we had to put all of these assets, these Riverbed arguments, basically JVM start up itself."
"As an Administrator, before we bought this AppInternals, I didn't have visibility on why items were slow or why an application was not running. This gives us the ability to see what's going on. The application is load balancing. We can now see if its own server has issues or just one specific server has issues."
"Many times what might have taken hours or days can be resolved in a few minutes."
"Transaction Tracing is the most useful; being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable."
"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."
"It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications."
 

Cons

"We'd like to be able to find out performance problems on application class and methods."
"There are some functional bugs when using TTW and making report queries (to generate graphs)."
"It's not as good as it was three years ago before meddling by an activist investor, privatization, and subsequent layoffs hurt support."
"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."
"I would like for it to have automated updates, the way the product updates itself should be all automated, as opposed to what it is now."
"We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end-to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network."
"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported."
"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."
"Scaling out requires the added cost of multiple servers, and we don't have plans to do that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
SharePath
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: March 2026.
884,933 professionals have used our research since 2012.