No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Correlsense SharePath comparison

Riverbed and Correlsense are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Additionally, 90% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Correlsense users who would recommend it.
Correlsense SharePath
Read 1 Correlsense SharePath review
  • 1,151 Views
  • 1,116 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Correlsense SharePath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Correlsense SharePath
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (64th)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1374792 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1374792
IT Support Specialist at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Great for visibility but lacks many features and difficult to update
We're customers. We don't have a special relationship with the company. I am the operation's application administrator. At the moment, the solution is monitoring the applications that we want it to monitor. We're not looking at it on a daily basis. We just use it here and there. The challenge we have is that we believe that Dynatrace can address some tasks we'd like done that are not possible to execute on this solution. Dynatrace includes monitoring of not just the logs, but the applications as well. Dynatrace also makes us include firewalls, etc. We could have it so there are end to end solutions or identifications within the process. What we have right now is only the app server as well as the database server and its connectivity. The solution does save time that's caused when creating SQL coding. However, there are some issues around AppInternals changing the code and giving us issues. From the point of view of the top management, we want a more permanent solution. We want to identify what causes issues and we are looking for a more end-to-end solution. That is why we are looking at Dynatrace. I don't know if I have any advice for other organizations. The experience I have is only based on my own limited experience. However, I believe that the application has the potential to be really good if it identifies what is really important to an organization. It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking. It's not fully complete. I'd rate the solution six out of ten. It addresses some of our needs, but there's a lot lacking that could be added to make it a fuller, more interesting product.
Read full review
it_user394539 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user394539
IT Capacity and Performance Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications.
It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications. It's hugely configurable in terms of how the data is presented and categorized. It's reliable, with low administration overheads once up and running It provides customer insight and behaviour. It's improved our…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Many times what might have taken hours or days can be resolved in a few minutes."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems, it's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."
"The product is very useful to find problems in middleware for the application servers, especially agent instrumentation and management is user friendly."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is the integration with their other systems. It's easy to understand and it points out the relevant problems in the enterprise."
"From the experience I had with these three tools, I realized that Riverbed was superior in all aspects (performance, user experience, and features)."
"Synthetic transactions, WMI and SNMP query capability."
"Clicks to root cause - fast & easy to diagnose and deep-dive"
"We just control on the backend of AppInternals what we want to instrument and what we don't want to instrument."
More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] pros
"It's a flexible APM solution that can be deployed across multiple applications."
 

Cons

"We had issues with the end-to-end view of unique customer: reviewing end-to-end customer problems to see where a problem is about customer, code, DB or network."
"There are some functional bugs when using TTW and making report queries (to generate graphs)."
"They should find a way for report generation from TTW to run quicker."
"It would be great if the solution could offer fixed bundles and more features."
"Deployment and agent patch management is not managed centrally, resulting in a large level of effort to update."
"It's still sort of half-baked without AppResponse. Without the other key features in infrastructure, like the network, firewalls, and proxies, it's lacking."
"Support for PHP, DB and other applications need to be supported."
"It's not as good as it was three years ago before meddling by an activist investor, privatization, and subsequent layoffs hurt support."
More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] cons
"Scaling out requires the added cost of multiple servers, and we don't have plans to do that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
No data available
 

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Compared 22% of the time
Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Logo
Dynatrace vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Datadog vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Logo
Datadog vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Compared 10% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Compared 8% of the time
IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Logo
IDERA Precise vs Aternity AppInternals [EOL]
Compared 8% of the time
More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Competitors
Splunk AppDynamics vs Correlsense SharePath Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Correlsense SharePath
Compared 13% of the time
Dynatrace vs Correlsense SharePath Logo
Dynatrace vs Correlsense SharePath
Compared 11% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Correlsense SharePath Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs Correlsense SharePath
Compared 11% of the time
OpenText Diagnostics vs Correlsense SharePath Logo
OpenText Diagnostics vs Correlsense SharePath
Compared 7% of the time
ContainIQ vs Correlsense SharePath Logo
ContainIQ vs Correlsense SharePath
Compared 6% of the time
More Correlsense SharePath Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2026
Aternity AppInternals [EOL] reportDownload Aternity AppInternals [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2026
Correlsense SharePath reportDownload Correlsense SharePath product report
 

Also Known As

SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
SharePath
 

Overview

Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

Riverbed

Correlsense SharePath delivers comprehensive application performance management, allowing organizations to gain visibility into complex IT environments. It ensures optimal performance and reliability for mission-critical applications.

By offering detailed transaction tracking, Correlsense SharePath enables users to pinpoint bottlenecks and inefficiencies with precision. Its high-level visibility helps reduce downtime and optimize resource allocation, ensuring that IT infrastructure runs smoothly. Designed for enterprise environments, it is a valuable tool for organizations requiring dependable monitoring and diagnostics capabilities.

What are the key features of Correlsense SharePath?
  • Transaction Tracking: Provides end-to-end tracking of transactions across distributed systems.
  • Real-Time Monitoring: Offers real-time insights into application performance.
  • Root Cause Analysis: Identifies the root causes of performance issues quickly.
  • Scalability: Designed to cater to enterprise-level demands.
  • Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing IT systems for enhanced functionality.
What benefits and ROI should users expect from Correlsense SharePath?
  • Performance Optimization: Leads to better application performance and reduced downtime.
  • Cost Efficiency: Enhances resource allocation, minimizing unnecessary expenses.
  • Improved Troubleshooting: Accelerates issue resolution time.
  • Employee Productivity: Reduces the time IT staff spend on diagnosing problems, enhancing productivity.

Correlsense SharePath is implemented across diverse industries like finance and telecommunications. In finance, it helps ensure seamless transaction processing, safeguarding customer experience. In telecommunications, it efficiently manages network applications, supporting uninterrupted service delivery.

Correlsense
 

Sample Customers

National Instruments, Allianz
London South Bank University, First International Bank of Israel
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.