We performed a comparison between Atempo Time Navigator and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The time navigation is the most valuable feature."
"What I like about Rubrik is that you can back up to the cloud. It is a different kind of backup where you're not archiving the tape. Rubrik is a physical appliance. It is a dedicated appliance to which you can back up, and you can also back up to another device. So, you can back up to Rubrik and then to another device. If you have more than one site, you can set up Rubrik on site A and also on site B. You can back up to the Rubrik on site A and then replicate that data to the Rubrik on site B."
"Takes me 80 percent less time to manage my backup environment."
"It has a streamlined user interface, provides an improved tech support experience, and reduces time required to locate and restore data."
"It has the ability to test DR in a controlled, inexpensive way and to restore between environments."
"The web interface is user-friendly, clean, and it provides a good summary of what you're protecting at a glance."
"The fact that the API is so available to us with the playground — there's an internal and public playground — is also valuable. We can write API calls — and although I'm sure there's a way we could hurt the data — we write those calls with a lot of certainty that we won't be destroying anything. We write these API calls using really easy mechanisms and generate automation a lot faster."
"The live mount reduces complexity."
"Disk mount that lets a restore happen immediately, no need to re-hydrate."
"They are working on the improvement we're looking for. The web GUI is flash-based and in around one or two months, they will put everything on HTML5."
"I would like a way to set monthly backups on a certain date and time."
"The Polaris piece could use improvement. When you get a report and you have events that are suspicious, you cannot drill down and find out why it's suspicious. You only know it's suspicious, but you don't know the root cause. Other than that, everything works well."
"In terms of what could be improved with Rubrik, we need to improve the backup for remote sites. The competitors are stronger in terms of their remote office back up. Rubrik needs to improve to be stronger for backup. This is the main thing."
"There is room for improvement in pricing. After the licensing, the price tends to go up as time goes by."
"We would like to be able to do granular restores directly from Exchange. Also, more granular management of VM backups would help."
"The reporting in the dashboard and reporting for extractions both need improvement. I would suggest making them easier to understand and use, not just out-of-the-box. We should also be able to customize them."
"The reporting, in particular the customization of reports, needs to be improved."
"Troubleshooting failed backups is difficult, and deciphering the logs without the help of support is usually almost impossible."
Earn 20 points
Atempo Time Navigator is ranked 58th in Backup and Recovery while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Backup and Recovery with 82 reviews. Atempo Time Navigator is rated 9.0, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Atempo Time Navigator writes "Offers good time navigation features and we haven't had stability problems in the twelve years we've been using it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Easy to use with minimal training required, innovative, good support". Atempo Time Navigator is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veritas NetBackup and Acronis Cyber Protect, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Zerto and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain).
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.