Asigra vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Asigra and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Asigra is ranked #69, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Asigra holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Asigra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Asigra

Read 20 Asigra reviews

426 Views
217 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,359 Views
719 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Asigra

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Asigra and OpenText Data Protector are both strong contenders in the data protection software market. While users are happier with the pricing and support of Asigra, OpenText Data Protector appears superior due to its features, which users find worth the price.

Features: Asigra is praised for its comprehensive data recovery options, cloud backup capabilities, and security features. OpenText Data Protector offers advanced automation, scalability, and superior integration options, making it suitable for larger enterprises. Users prefer the feature robustness of OpenText Data Protector over Asigra.

Room for Improvement: Asigra users highlight a need for a more intuitive setup process, better reporting features, and enhanced customer support. OpenText Data Protector users recommend improved stability, faster support responses, and a more user-friendly interface. OpenText Data Protector's stability is more frequently noted as needing improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asigra is generally easy to deploy, with users appreciating its straightforward implementation and supportive customer service. OpenText Data Protector, although more complex to deploy, offers comprehensive support that aids in the process. Customers find Asigra simpler to deploy, but OpenText Data Protector's strong customer service can be a decisive factor for some users.

Pricing and ROI: Asigra provides a more cost-effective solution with a favorable ROI praised by users. OpenText Data Protector, while more expensive, is viewed as delivering greater long-term value due to its advanced features. Users find Asigra more budget-friendly initially but recognize the greater ROI potential in OpenText Data Protector over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,438 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Asigra

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

69th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Asigra is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer1361796

Manager Technical Procurement & Logistics - Global IT at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Affordable, easy to use, and offers good pricing

The solution is primarily used for the backup of the endpoints within our organization The solution has been very stable. It's quite easy to use and simple to navigate around. The performance has always been very good. The pricing of the product is excellent. I wouldn't describe it as a…

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The agentless architecture has minimized our software footprint at the client level."

"It has helped us to provide comprehensive data protection with high recovery rates and a malware scanning feature."

"I have found all the features useful in the solution."

"The solution has been very stable."

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its ease of management. It was not complex. In terms of features, I can mention a couple of things. For example, if you need to restore a VM, you can do it with multiple streams in OpenText Data Protector, which is an advantage over Commvault, from what I've noticed, having worked with multiple tools. Another thing is the Oracle backups; configuring Oracle backups is much easier in OpenText Data Protector."

"The file system backup (by far, the most used) is the most valuable feature."

"The feature that was most valuable was that we could restore one mailbox and we could do different backups for different databases."

"The stability of the product seems to be quite good."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"I like that it supports HPE UNIX servers since many backup solutions do not - this is the main reason why we chose this solution."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"They should improve the malware scanning capabilities, extending it to protect cloud application data."

"The management could be a bit better."

"They should design the solution so that it is much easier for deployment and make the UI easy to use."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"It has a lot of undeveloped functions like window searching and patent searching, and within the main backup processes like VMware and Microsoft Exchange. It's completely not user-friendly, and it has no built-in antivirus software. In my opinion, Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution."

"It's very expensive compared to Veeam and other similar solutions."

"I'm uncertain if it supports virtual machine backup and restoration. If they could enhance this aspect, they could gain more support from end users."

"The Micro Focus Data Protector support is not as good as Veeam Backup & Replication's support."

"Many of our users complain about the GUI. You still need to rely on the command line interface. Because it originated as a Unix system, Data Protector is still a command line-driven solution, which makes it seem rather dated compared to systems that are built around a GUI from day one. It doesn't affect the functionality, but some people don't find it user-friendly."

"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Asigra could improve, it is expensive. We have purchased an annual license."

"Asigra is priced competitively, but requires technical expertise to operate, optimize, and maintain its services."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Educational Organization

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Asigra

Compared 62% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Asigra

Compared 21% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Asigra

Compared 18% of the time

More Asigra Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 53% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Asigra

June 2025

Download Asigra product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Asigra makes award-winning enterprise backup and recovery software that leads the industry in secure, reliable, manageable and affordable data protection. Asigra Cloud Backup works in the cloud or on-premise, for everything from mobile devices to entire data centers.

Asigra

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

British Red Cross, Special Olympics, London and Capital, L and K Bennett London, The Commonwealth, Hanrick Curran

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

June 2025

Free Report: Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.