Asigra vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Asigra and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Asigra is ranked #67, while OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0. Asigra holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Asigra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Asigra

Read 20 Asigra reviews

469 Views
431 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,596 Views
1,325 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Asigra

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Asigra and OpenText Data Protector are both strong contenders in the data protection software market. While users are happier with the pricing and support of Asigra, OpenText Data Protector appears superior due to its features, which users find worth the price.

Features: Asigra is praised for its comprehensive data recovery options, cloud backup capabilities, and security features. OpenText Data Protector offers advanced automation, scalability, and superior integration options, making it suitable for larger enterprises. Users prefer the feature robustness of OpenText Data Protector over Asigra.

Room for Improvement: Asigra users highlight a need for a more intuitive setup process, better reporting features, and enhanced customer support. OpenText Data Protector users recommend improved stability, faster support responses, and a more user-friendly interface. OpenText Data Protector's stability is more frequently noted as needing improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Asigra is generally easy to deploy, with users appreciating its straightforward implementation and supportive customer service. OpenText Data Protector, although more complex to deploy, offers comprehensive support that aids in the process. Customers find Asigra simpler to deploy, but OpenText Data Protector's strong customer service can be a decisive factor for some users.

Pricing and ROI: Asigra provides a more cost-effective solution with a favorable ROI praised by users. OpenText Data Protector, while more expensive, is viewed as delivering greater long-term value due to its advanced features. Users find Asigra more budget-friendly initially but recognize the greater ROI potential in OpenText Data Protector over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Asigra

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

67th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Asigra is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer1361796

Manager Technical Procurement & Logistics - Global IT at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Affordable, easy to use, and offers good pricing

The solution is primarily used for the backup of the endpoints within our organization The solution has been very stable. It's quite easy to use and simple to navigate around. The performance has always been very good. The pricing of the product is excellent. I wouldn't describe it as a…

Read full review

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has helped us to provide comprehensive data protection with high recovery rates and a malware scanning feature."

"I have found all the features useful in the solution."

"The agentless architecture has minimized our software footprint at the client level."

"The solution has been very stable."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"It is very easy to use and the interaction with various systems is very handy."

"Data Protector's GUI is the most useful feature."

"Regarding scalability, it's unlimited with Data Protector. You can link multiple installations and let them work together. They can share backup devices. You have many possibilities with Data Protector. It's very proficient."

"The most valuable features of this solution were the features we worked most with which were telemetry, and the scheduler."

"The solution is easy to use."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"They should improve the malware scanning capabilities, extending it to protect cloud application data."

"The management could be a bit better."

"The graphical interface needs to be improved."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"I would like to see a better user interface in the next release."

"VMware backup integration and cloud recovery is lacking."

"I don't like this solution so much because it's very technical and compared to Commvault and Veeam, it's not so user-friendly. The interface needs improvement."

"Virtualization."

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"The solution is not intuitive enough. I think they should work on the user experience and the graphical interface. These can be a lot better."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Asigra is priced competitively, but requires technical expertise to operate, optimize, and maintain its services."

"The price of Asigra could improve, it is expensive. We have purchased an annual license."

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

"Pricing for Micro Focus Data Protector is reasonable."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs Asigra

Compared 52% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Asigra

Compared 30% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Asigra

Compared 19% of the time

More Asigra Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 49% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Asigra

August 2025

Download Asigra product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

August 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Asigra makes award-winning enterprise backup and recovery software that leads the industry in secure, reliable, manageable and affordable data protection. Asigra Cloud Backup works in the cloud or on-premise, for everything from mobile devices to entire data centers.

Asigra

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

British Red Cross, Special Olympics, London and Capital, L and K Bennett London, The Commonwealth, Hanrick Curran

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

July 2025

Free Report: Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Asigra vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.