Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Download the complete report

Helped 909,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Networks Platform

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (3rd)

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Arista Networks Platform is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Arista Networks Platform	3.7%
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch	1.2%
Other	95.1%

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

Dibyendu Das

Director at a tech company with 11-50 employees

Ultra-low latency networking has delivered reliable video workflows and critical operations

The support of Arista Networks Platform is quite complex; it is not very easy to configure. It needs a lot of network expertise for token sheddings and different kinds of configurations. It is very difficult to configure because Arista Networks Platform does not have a flexible GUI like Huawei or Netgear; everything is a very CLI kind of mainframe architecture. Scalability at every single step has a huge upgrade cost which is required for port mapping, connectivity, and transceivers certified by Arista Networks Platform, then the fabric upgrades from a software firmware level. Arista Networks Platform should improve commercial aspects to be affordable. There is no path for growth with a perfect score because the focus is more on reducing costs globally.

Read full review

Mohammed ThousifAnsari

Team Lead at Thoshiba

Working with network switches simplifies configuration, but documentation needs improvement

My recommendation is to understand the basic concepts clearly before starting your career. While basic concepts might seem simple, they can be very complicated when explored in detail. This foundational knowledge is essential for building a successful career. I would rate the overall solution as a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They support open standard features."

"We are always surprised about the proficiency of the speed of the technical support."

"The most valuable feature is the Linux shell, which is useful for troubleshooting or capturing traffic."

"The biggest advantages in Arista Networks Platform for me over the past three years are that it works very well, it is not that noisy (I modified it with silent fans), it was less bulky than Cisco, and it worked very well because it has an extra for a more precise clock, which also helps my use case."

"Arista Networks Platform's features have significantly improved network visibility and operational efficiency."

"If you are looking for an ultra-low latency network, this is the only solution."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"I find the operational system used by Arista to be very valuable, and the hardware is exceptionally nice. Arista has a unified operational system called EOS that is easy to set up and replicate on other devices. The ease of configuration and transition between devices is a significant advantage for me."

More Arista Networks Platform pros

"The solution saves time and money for my customer in terms of reliability and product durability."

"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."

"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."

"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."

"7210 SAS help transformed our legacy network to an MPLS based services and improved the network performance and availability."

"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."

"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."

Cons

"The overall price of the Arista Networks Platform is expensive. It should be reduced."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Its price can be better."

"From VMware, I think the cost of the tools is very high."

"The intent-based networking management, together with the provider of these solutions that are already free, would be beneficial."

"The documentation did not explain that we could not vary the speed between ports that are in the same block. For example, we cannot have 1G and 10G on the neighboring ports; all four ports have to be 1G or 10G, which was very annoying for us when we realized that we needed to change the configuration and the cabling that we had already prepared."

"Arista is very expensive."

"They need to enhance their code and their EOS. They need to improve some security features, and there are quite a number of bugs in their system. So, they need to work on that piece. In the next release, we need to have a modular feature. Instead of providing an integrated solution, they should go for something modular. They need to come up with modular highly scalable models. Even at the chassis layer, I want to see some improvement."

More Arista Networks Platform cons

"The solution needs more monitoring tools."

"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."

"We would like to have an unified monitoring system, while Nokia have different monitoring system for different product, we find it to be quite troublesome."

"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."

"The release is not very stable. You should have stability in the card."

"This solution is not particularly flexible."

"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."

"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."

"If one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product price as seven out of ten."

"Arista Networks Platform was cheaper than Cisco. I have heard that the product is affordable for enterprise-sized companies."

"Specific tools definitely require a license for the subscription. But we are not using these tools in our environment. In terms of licensing, you need to spend approximately $10,000 per month."

"Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."

"Network devices are generally expensive. However, during the evaluation, Arista was the most inexpensive vendor."

"I remember that when our customers were offered the Arista Networks Platform, they used a checklist to compare the prices between Arista and Cisco for their requirements, and found that the prices were almost the same."

More Arista Networks Platform pricing and cost advice

"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."

"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Networks Platform?

The initial setup cost is high compared to others, and I find the initial setup cost to be very high.

What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?

Arista Networks Platform could improve its command line management. Coming from a Cisco background, the adjustment period was challenging. While similar in some areas, the AOS concept, especially a...

What is your primary use case for Arista Networks Platform?

I have worked with deploying Arista Networks Platform in data center environments, particularly for spine and leaf architectures. The configurations involved Zero Touch Provisioning, which went ver...

What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

We can understand the customer network better and propose products accordingly as areas for improvement. Engaging with customers directly would improve how that could be done easily. Many times the...

What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

I am a system integrator working for different customers. My clients use this product for their network, either for network upgrade or new rollout.

What advice do you have for others considering Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

This possibility could be provided by the vendor. I advise people looking to use Nokia Ethernet Service Switch to always look for reliability rather than going for cheaper Chinese products. On a sc...

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Comparisons

Compared 22% of the time

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Nexus vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Arista Networks Platform Competitors

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 17% of the time

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 8% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Arista Networks Platform

Download Arista Networks Platform product report

Ethernet Switches

Download Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report

Also Known As

7000 Series

Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS

Overview

Arista Networks Platform offers ultra-low latency and scalability with high bandwidth while simplifying network management through its intuitive dashboard. It enables robust support for EVPN and VXLAN, making it a top choice for modern data centers requiring efficient and effective networking solutions.

Designed to minimize complexity, Arista Networks Platform integrates seamlessly with a single operating system, providing streamlined operations. With automation capabilities via EOS and CloudVision, it enhances visibility and provisioning. Platinum and titanium power supplies contribute to reduced carbon footprints, aligning with sustainability goals. While configuration complexity and high pricing pose challenges, it remains a preferred choice for data center networking, offering premium performance and cost-effectiveness. It excels in environments like smart cities and finance, providing stability and scalability essential for demanding applications.

What are the key features of Arista Networks Platform?

Ultra-Low Latency: Ensures prompt data transmission and network responsiveness.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands and data loads.
High Bandwidth: Supports increased data transfer rates for efficient network operations.
Intuitive Dashboard: Enhances manageability and monitoring with streamlined interfaces.
EVPN and VXLAN Support: Provides flexible and robust networking options.
Platinum and Titanium Power Supplies: Reduce carbon footprint while ensuring reliable performance.
EOS and CloudVision Automation: Improves visibility, provisioning, and network operation efficiency.

What benefits should users look for in Arista Networks Platform?

Cost-Effectiveness: Balances premium performance with investment value.
Reduced Complexity: Streamlined integration simplifies network management.
Improved Visibility: Enhanced automation capabilities offer better monitoring and control.
High Throughput: Supports demanding applications with reliable data handling.
Sustainability: Eco-friendly power options align with environmental goals.

Arista Networks Platform is widely implemented across industries such as finance and smart cities, supporting critical applications in network security and scalable infrastructure. It is instrumental in data center networking, video production workflows, and robotic automation. Users benefit from its spine-leaf architectures and wireless connectivity, particularly in sectors requiring high throughput and reliability.

Arista

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch delivers high availability, interoperability with open standards, and advanced traffic management, aimed at enhancing network operations for organizations managing complex systems.

Offering a robust infrastructure, Nokia Ethernet Service Switch focuses on streamlining network efficiency through features like superior data aggregation and device utilization. Users note its powerful capabilities, but mention a need for improved configuration simplicity and comprehensive documentation. Users seek better integration with a unified monitoring system, open licenses to reduce management overhead, and improved collaboration with AMI vendors. While it handles scalability and reliability effectively, there is room for improvements in segment routing and cloud integration.

What features define Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

Interoperability: Aligns with open standards for seamless integration.
High Availability: Ensures continuous network service.
Traffic Management: Advanced tools for efficient network traffic handling.
Data Aggregation: Combines data streams for optimized use.
Scalability: Adapts to changes in network demand.
Telecom Portal Compliance: Meets industry standards for network operations.

Which benefits or ROI should users consider?

Network Efficiency: Enhanced performance through better traffic and device management.
Reliability: Trusted uptime with lesser downtime risks.
Market Enhancement: Compliance with telecom standards boosts market credibility.
Cost Management: Open licenses offer more economical network management.

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is widely implemented in control systems for electric and gas grids, integrating seamlessly with EMSS and enhancing network power capacity for effective traffic management. Users value its role as a mobile gateway and in facilitating network upgrades or rollouts, often transitioning from other providers to optimize network operations.

Nokia

Sample Customers

American Internet Services

Information Not Available

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch