Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Arista and Nokia are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Arista is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.4, while Nokia is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3. Arista holds a 3.1% mindshare in ES, compared to Nokia’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nokia users who would recommend it.

Arista Networks Platform

Read 27 Arista Networks Platform reviews

3,990 Views
3,352 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Read 7 Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reviews

768 Views
768 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arista Networks Platform

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Arista Networks Platform and Nokia Ethernet Service Switch are competitors in the networking hardware market. Arista Networks Platform is noted for its ease of deployment and customer service, while Nokia Ethernet Service Switch stands out with a robust feature set and value.

Features: Arista Networks Platform is recognized for automation capabilities, seamless third-party integration, and support for EVPN and VXLAN. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch includes comprehensive security features, extensive traffic management solutions, and advanced data aggregation for enhanced device utilization.

Room for Improvement: Arista Networks Platform could enhance its security features, offer more extensive traffic management solutions, and improve its complex legacy support integration. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch might benefit from streamlining its deployment process, enhancing customer interface, and offering more competitive pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista Networks Platform provides a straightforward deployment with excellent customer support for seamless implementation. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch requires a more complex process for deployment but is supported by a dedicated team that ensures efficient issue resolution.

Pricing and ROI: Arista Networks Platform offers competitive pricing with favorable ROI due to lower setup costs and operational efficiencies. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch, although more expensive initially, offers extended value through advanced features that justify the higher price.

To learn more, read our detailed Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arista Networks Platform

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (5th)

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Arista Networks Platform is 3.1%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arista Networks Platform	3.1%
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch	0.9%
Other	96.0%

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

MarekSzafrański

Senior Core Network Engineer at Eurofins

Affordable for enterprise-sized companies

Speaking about whether the product enhanced our company's data center scalability, I would say that it was a solution that was used in a banking company, where it served as a replacement for Cisco. Though Arista Networks Platform is similar to Cisco IOS CLI, I feel that the former product offers better prices compared to the latter tool. Arista Networks Platform office is more efficient at a lower cost. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. The tool is stable and cheaper than Cisco. I would say that Arista Networks Platform is 100 percent compatible with the existing infrastructure in my company. The impact of the tool's network telemetry on our company's troubleshooting practices was just good for the scope for which I need the product. I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Montassar Turki

Tech Lead - R&D at Numeryx

Empowering networks with enhanced scalability and reliability

It provides excellent scalability capabilities, as well as the flexibility to work with different cost structures. It supports a large number of switches very well and meets the specific requirements. In our enterprise, we currently have two hundred servers, and this technology accommodates our growing user base, which may reach millions of users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What we like most is its performance to price ratio."

"The most valuable aspect of Arista Networks products is their ease of configuration, especially when compared to Cisco products. When we implement advanced features for data centers such as BGP EVPN and VXLAN, Arista's configuration process is similar to that of Cisco's process, but at the same time it is simply much easier, clearer, and more understandable."

"The most valuable feature is the Linux shell, which is useful for troubleshooting or capturing traffic."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution has good load latency. They're the market leader in this aspect right now."

"If someone uses Arista Networks Platform, I believe they are secured."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The solution is scalable."

More Arista Networks Platform pros

"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."

"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."

"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."

"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."

"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."

"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."

Cons

"The solution needs to accommodate new features."

"Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers."

"The product fails to offer functions related to cloud orchestration, making it in areas where improvements are required."

"Arista Networks is currently less popular as they were initially more focused on data centers than campus networks. They should expand further into campus networks."

"They should have a more stable code."

"Something that you will often hear about Arista products is that the price is a bit too high and, like with Cisco, we sometimes have problems with our customers because of its pricing."

"The overall price of the Arista Networks Platform is expensive. It should be reduced."

"I want the solution to include a unified controller."

More Arista Networks Platform cons

"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."

"I would like to see more collaboration with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) vendors, such as Itron."

"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."

"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."

"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."

"The solution needs more monitoring tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The customer price for an Arista router is approximately $7,000 USD, while Cisco's is around $18,000."

"The price of the Arista Networks Platform could be less expensive for the hardware and license."

"I rate the product price a seven on a scale of one to ten where ten is high price and one is low price."

"There is an annual license required to use the Arista Networks Platform."

"It is pretty pricey for a networking platform. It is on par with Cisco."

"Network devices are generally expensive. However, during the evaluation, Arista was the most inexpensive vendor."

"Specific tools definitely require a license for the subscription. But we are not using these tools in our environment. In terms of licensing, you need to spend approximately $10,000 per month."

"Cost wise, Arista Networks Platform is more expensive than other networking solutions."

More Arista Networks Platform pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."

"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Arista Networks Platform?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arista Networks Platform?

Arista products are perceived as costly, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?

Currently, Arista is too costly for its customers. Feature-wise, it addresses most customer requirements. However, we sometimes face challenges when integrating with proprietary protocols and solut...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

We can understand the customer network better and propose products accordingly as areas for improvement. Engaging with customers directly would improve how that could be done easily. Many times the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

I am a system integrator working for different customers. My clients use this product for their network, either for network upgrade or new rollout.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

This possibility could be provided by the vendor. I advise people looking to use Nokia Ethernet Service Switch to always look for reliability rather than going for cheaper Chinese products. On a sc...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Juniper EX Series Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Aruba Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 8% of the time

D-Link Ethernet Switches vs Arista Networks Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More Arista Networks Platform Competitors

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 45% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 20% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 9% of the time

Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 9% of the time

NVIDIA Mellanox vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform

October 2025

Download Arista Networks Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

October 2025

Download Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report

Also Known As

7000 Series

Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS

Overview

Arista Networks Platform is a stable and reliable solution for data center features, specifically for non-blocking switches used for spine-leaf connectivity with servers hooked to these switches. It also provides multi-layer switches for client networks, particularly in the banking sector.

Arista products are preferred for their stability, good hardware, ease of adoption and configuration, responsive and helpful support, and high throughput ratings. The solution has helped prevent screen loss and business outages in the media industry and is designed for next-generation data centers.

Arista

The Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch (ESS) family of Carrier Ethernet switch routers is designed to deliver advanced Carrier Ethernet services. It also provides the ideal platform for the metro Ethernet aggregation of fixed and mobile networks.

Nokia

Sample Customers

American Internet Services

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

September 2025

Free Report: Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Find out what your peers are saying about Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arista Networks Platform vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch report.

See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.