Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
2019-10-31T09:55:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 12

What needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Arista Networks Platform.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

5
PeerSpot user
5 Answers
SH
Senior Network Engineer II at Mercury General Corporation
Real User
Top 5
2021-05-01T00:04:28Z
01 May 21

Its price can be better.

NW
Head of Technical at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
Top 5
2021-01-23T18:31:52Z
23 January 21

The solution needs to improve their product range. They've added a few items, however, they're a bit of a johnny-come-lately to a lot of other competitors in the space and they need to compete for more for the attention of various sizes of business. They basically need to include more models in their offering. The one thing they lack is Microsegmentation solutions. In contrast, Cisco offers that. It has something called ACI, and we lose out on contracts due to the fact that Arista doesn't have a similar offering. Clients would like to have that on hand as when clients deal with the Cloud base, Microsoft segmentation can be managed with, in a sense, Analytics.

FF
Vice President, Network Engineering at Pico
Real User
Top 5
2021-01-22T19:45:32Z
22 January 21

There is a lot of room for improvement within the solution. Any product, however, can improve. No product is perfect. The solution needs to accommodate new features. I have personally made some recommendations in the past and hope to see this implemented in their product line. I think there is a need for improvement in the area of their VXLAN/EVPN capability but their current solution is great regardless but may be not very scalable for a global deployment.

it_user1033941 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-01-12T07:22:00Z
12 January 20

Some new features are needed. Arista is technology-driven by themselves. At times they are limited by standards that are not formally closed. I would like to see more integration with one of the providers from each intent-based network for compliance documentation and IT security purposes. For future development of the product, being able to manage the security or relevant paths with intent-based networking is important. The intent-based network is a management that is on our security level. The intent-based networking management, together with the provider of these solutions that are already free, would be beneficial. I don't worry that there is a time gap between finalizing as triple E standards before integrating with the future release.

WB
Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2019-10-31T09:55:00Z
31 October 19

The documentation for this solution needs to be improved. In the documentation, it is not easy to find the exact solution which describes the configuration step by step. It means that we've had to ask our supplier how to use certain features, and which commands to use. We can find a simple description on the website, as well as a list of the features, but a more complete description is not available. It is not clear exactly how to configure and use each of the features. For other vendors, we can find the exact configuration, with examples, that we need to deploy for any new features. The documentation did not explain that we could not vary the speed between ports that are in the same block. For example, we cannot have 1G and 10G on the neighboring ports. All four ports have to be 1G or 10G, which was very annoying for us when we realized that we needed to change the configuration and the cabling that we had already prepared. In the next release of this solution, we would like the option to use two switches as one virtual switch. The CVP management platform needs to be improved.

Related Questions
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
May 01, 2021
Hi, We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information. Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
2 out of 4 answers
Dibyendu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at Apace Systems Corporation
01 April 20
Arista is very expensive. Not everybody is in a position to spend $70,000 to $80,000 for one switch. For our customers that have a budget of $4,000 to $5,000 for one switch fabric, we generally recommend NETGEAR. That is also a very good switch. If somebody wants something cheaper than that, we recommend they go for something else. For a market like India, Africa, and Asia, people always think twice because Arista is expensive compared to the competition. Of course, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison. There are no other products that you can directly compare with Arista. It's the difference between getting a V12 engine and a generic engine. You need to be able to afford a V12. Arista is not for everybody.
FF
Vice President, Network Engineering at Pico
22 January 21
Arista and Cisco are comparatively the same or Cisco a bit more expensive depending on the platforms. However, I like Arista's licensing approach. Cisco licensing could be made simpler.
Deepak Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Executive at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
May 10, 2017
HP 5900 series can competitive of Juniper EX4600 ?  
See 2 answers
Deepak Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Executive at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
29 December 16
Is there any person have better understanding about HP 5900 VS Juniper EX4600 ?
Deepak Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior IT Executive at a healthcare company with 501-1,000 employees
10 May 17
Hp 5900 vs juniper ex4600 comparison????
Download Free Report
Download our free Arista Networks Platform Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
633,572 professionals have used our research since 2012.