"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
ARIS Process Governance is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0, while OpenText ProVision is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "Very easy to use and great for modeling business processes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Stable with okay pricing but needs better integration capabilities". ARIS Process Governance is most compared with , whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Visio, ARIS BPA and Bonita. See our ARIS Process Governance vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
