ArcSight Logger vs Elastic Stack comparison

OpenText and Elastic are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Elastic is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.4. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Elastic’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Elastic users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Logger

Read 32 ArcSight Logger reviews

2,948 Views
2,889 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Elastic Stack

Read 18 Elastic Stack reviews

6,848 Views
6,848 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Elastic Stack

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Elastic Stack are leading solutions in log management and analysis, each offering specific capabilities for enterprise clients. Elastic Stack tends to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and broad feature set.

Features: ArcSight Logger features robust search functionality, scalability, and dedicated support. Elastic Stack provides open-source adaptability, strong integration capabilities, and a vast range of plugins and visualization tools, enhancing customization.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could see advancements in reporting, analytics, and user interface enhancements. Elastic Stack could improve by streamlining the configuration process, boosting performance under heavy loads, and enhancing documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger receives favorable reviews for its reliable deployment model and effective customer service. Elastic Stack, with deployment flexibility across environments, often requires significant community support to navigate its initial setup.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger is considered more costly, with longer implementation times impacting short-term ROI, but this is mitigated by its long-term dependability. Elastic Stack, viewed as initially cost-effective through its open-source nature, delivers good ROI in flexibility and adaptability, though it may demand greater internal expertise for efficient operation.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Elastic Stack

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Stack is 1.9%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Elastic Stack	1.9%
ArcSight Logger	0.9%
Other	97.2%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shoaib Abdulla

Sr. Cybersecurity Consultant IT/OT at EJADA

Compliance and cost-effectiveness have improved while critical infrastructure security adapts to evolving needs

ArcSight Logger fulfills compliance requirements and passes audit requirements. It is one of the Aramco standards requirements and is recommended by Aramco for any implementation. Aramco, SABIC, water companies, and electricity companies are critical infrastructure with air-gapped networks. In an air-gapped network, there is no communication going out from that network area to the outside world, even to the corporate network. ArcSight Logger is installed on minimal resources with minimal requirements. There are not many upgrades or new features that come up frequently, though they do occur occasionally.

Read full review

Lakshmi Bodepu

Senior Consultant at Skillfield

Offers robust out-of-the-box integrations and streamlines logging processes effortlessly

There are improvements needed for Elastic Stack. It is mostly based on Lucene, and the heart of Elastic Stack is Lucene, which has some limitations. Anything built on top of Lucene often feels an add-on, and that includes vector databases. Elastic Stack can store vector embeddings as well and perform AI and machine learning tasks out of the box without excessive configuration. The main improvements involve increasing speed and compression capabilities; I have seen databases that claim to achieve significantly better compression. While Elastic Stack can manage vast amounts of data, if the mapping is not specified correctly, the indexing time can be slow, especially with many events per second. Improper mapping usually means that every document received gets indexed for all fields, which is not desired. Elastic consultants typically optimize this, but out of the box, as data volume increases, scaling becomes necessary. They are working on these improvements in new versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution offers very good performance and is efficient."

"ArcSight Logger is very stable and useful for customers."

"This is a solution that is straightforward and easy to use."

"Our return on investment for implementing ArcSight Logger over the past 12 months has been positive."

"As the name suggests, it's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."

"The functionalities of this particular server is absolutely phenomenal."

"The ESM use cases are the most valuable; it enables us to use the big data collection inside our company, and we are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"The solution's technical support is good...Elastic Stack offers good value for value for money based on the product's features and what they offer."

"We can group a lot of alarms into one automation alarm supervision. The alarm supervision allows us to put the alarm under the same. It's quite helpful for us. We used that to suppress our alarms. Elastic already provides the agent. It is easy to integrate Elastic Stack with other devices and vendors."

"I have experienced a return on investment from the use of the solution."

"The tool is huge, and it performs brilliantly. I tested it for malware, and within two weeks of launching, the product alerted me about a network intrusion. This was a tough test for it, but it performed admirably. The alerting system is excellent, and searching through logs is incredibly efficient. What's impressive is that all three products or options are integrated into one solution. This means I don't need separate logging, monitoring, or antivirus solutions."

"I have benefited from the security features provided by X-Pack in Elastic Stack, particularly the SIEM capability, which is very good for checking security issues."

"I think the ecosystem is well supported, and for logs, it was faster compared to our previous previous log management."

"The detection rules in Elastic Stack are the most valuable feature. The search capabilities are excellent and fast. As we collect logs from workstations and devices, the detection rules run on top of the logs and detect any suspicious activity, raising alerts accordingly. Integration with Elastic Stack depends on the specific integration. Elastic provides some bridging integrations that make it easy, but require custom integration. Most integrations are simple, but customization can be challenging because we need to do some parsing. There's something called Elastic Common Schema, and we need to parse the source logs to match this schema, which can be a bit challenging."

"The tool's most powerful aspect is its search engine capability. It's a highly effective and powerful solution for searching. We use it in professional and student projects at universities, and it delivers promising results."

More Elastic Stack pros

Cons

"I would like to see better scheduling in the next release of this solution."

"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."

"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."

"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."

"Scaling this product is painful."

"The only drawback is that without ESM, you are limited."

"The integration with other systems could be improved."

"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"While Elastic Stack can manage vast amounts of data, if the mapping is not specified correctly, the indexing time can be slow, especially with many events per second."

"Support could be improved. The error code is not helpful. We have to ask for it or pass it on to community forums."

"It should facilitate easier manual integration."

"The solution is expensive, particularly the training and certification. If customers want to increase their use of Elastic Stack, they should consider reducing the cost of certification and training."

"Elastic Stack should be more simplified with ready-to-use widgets."

"The implementation of dashboards in the solution needs to be made easier...I had some issues with the ports and configuration since it was kind of complex to implement with Docker."

"Elastic Stack should work on their dashboards and integration process."

"Improving integration capabilities, especially with authentication systems, firewalls, and security controls, is a crucial area for improvement in Elastic Stack. Additionally, enhancing functionality to handle large Yara queries more efficiently would be beneficial, as many EDR solutions can run such queries faster than Elastic Stack's current limitations."

More Elastic Stack cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"If I compare Elastic Stack to the other products in the market, I would say that the tool is available at a competitive price."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"I used the open-source version of Elastic Stack, because of which I did not have to pay anything."

"The product is expensive."

"It depends on the specifics, but generally, Elastic is economical for certain use cases."

"Ultimately, the pricing depends upon the capacity planning that the enterprise architect does."

"We are using the open-source community version of the product."

"The pricing is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

This decision is made by higher management as they don't want to have multiple solutions for one solution. ArcSight Logger themselves don't provide good support, but companies such as ours provide ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ArcSight Logger?

We do work for multiple SIEM solutions such as Splunk, QRadar, LogRhythm. My team and I mostly work on ArcSight Logger and Splunk because we are dealing with projects related to these solutions. We...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ArcSight Logger?

As a department head, my staff uses my credentials and contacts everywhere. Only ArcSight Logger with Splunk was implemented in Aramco, not in other organizations. I rate ArcSight Logger 8 out of 10.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Stack?

My experience with Elastic Stack pricing indicates that it is node-based. While I do not have complete pricing details, they are available online. If I choose Elastic Cloud, it includes licensing a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Stack?

I would like to improve Elastic Stack by addressing the current big problem we face with importing logs and log files, such as syslogs. To import these log files, we need to design the ingest pipel...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Elastic Stack?

Elastic Stack is primarily used for everything related to security, including security systems, checking the security system, and also servers and networks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Logs vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 4% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

Wazuh vs Elastic Stack

Compared 20% of the time

Security Onion vs Elastic Stack

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Elastic Stack

Compared 5% of the time

Falcon LogScale vs Elastic Stack

Compared 5% of the time

Cribl vs Elastic Stack

Compared 4% of the time

More Elastic Stack Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger

August 2026

Download ArcSight Logger product report

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Stack

August 2026

Download Elastic Stack product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

No data available

Overview

ArcSight Logger effectively manages vast log data volumes, streamlining complex query execution and data compression while supporting various devices to meet compliance needs.

ArcSight Logger, known for scalability, simplifies handling extensive log data and executes complex queries swiftly. Its data compression features, coupled with versatile device support, allow for smooth security analytics and log collection. Users appreciate its real-time network insights and intuitive interface. However, improvements are needed in indexing speed, user navigation simplification, enhanced system integration, advanced analytics, and comprehensive threat management. Companies leverage ArcSight Logger for on-premises log management, vital for IT asset event monitoring and compliance within telecom and enterprise sectors.

What are the key features?

Scalability: Handles large log data volumes efficiently.
Complex Query Execution: Quickly executes intricate queries.
Data Compression: Optimizes storage with excellent compression.
Device Support: Out-of-the-box compatibility with numerous devices.
Customization: Easily customizes to user needs.
Security Analytics: Provides robust analytics for security requirements.
Real-time Insights: Offers awareness of ongoing network activities.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Compliance Assurance: Meets audit requirements with comprehensive insights.
Time Efficiency: Fast query execution reduces analysis time.
Reduced Storage Costs: Data compression lowers storage expenses.
Enhanced Security: Improves security posture with real-time analytics.

In industries like telecom and enterprise, ArcSight Logger facilitates on-premises deployments to manage logs, process queries, and integrate with security tools, essential for incident response. It aids in retaining logs, monitoring Windows events, overseeing communications, and is employed in fraud prevention and security monitoring involving syslog servers.

OpenText

Elastic Stack is a comprehensive tool for log management, observability, indexing, and security, widely adopted for managing logs, alert creation, SIEM, SOC, and threat analysis. It integrates with CloudStrike and Endpoint Security, enhancing search capabilities and Application Performance Monitoring.

Elastic Stack offers powerful solutions for logging, data storage, and visualization with Kibana. It allows MSSPs to efficiently manage security and assists companies with data analysis. It's known for its easy implementation, scalability, real-time monitoring, and extensive integrations. The open-source nature and community support add significant value, making it a popular choice across industries. While highly capable, there is a need for enhancement in dashboard implementation, data integration, and certain advanced features. Licensing, compatibility, and cost-related improvements can further elevate its efficacy.

What are the key features of Elastic Stack?

Powerful Search Capabilities: Offers robust, efficient searching across vast datasets
Scalability: Easily handles large volumes of data
Anomaly Detection: Identifies irregular patterns in data
Machine Learning: Enhances data analysis with intelligent insights
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides up-to-date monitoring of applications and systems
Extensive Integration: Supports diverse tools and solutions

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Implementation: Quick setup and integration into existing systems
Robust Security: Comprehensive monitoring and analysis capabilities
Community Support: Ongoing improvements and guidance from a dedicated community
Hybrid Deployment: Flexibility in using both cloud and on-premise solutions

In healthcare, Elastic Stack enhances database search capabilities, aiding in patient record management and data retrieval. Managed Security Service Providers use it for comprehensive security management, integrating it with tools like firewalls and authentication systems. Companies benefit from its application in Application Performance Monitoring and its flexibility in adapting to hybrid environments.

Elastic

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack

June 2026

Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.