We performed a comparison between ARCON Secure Compliance Management and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Good for productivity checking."
"It is very user friendly. There are not a lot of clicks and buttons. The tool helps me with the installations. The user can do the installation rather than having a technical guide. I also like the browsing stream. It has a good dashboard."
"The support for ARCON ARSIM is very good."
"The report function is the solution's greatest asset."
"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."
"The solution is scalable, but other solutions are better."
"It's not an obstacle for developers. They can easily write their code and make it more secure with Checkmarx."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"Checkmarx has helped us deliver more secure products. We are able to do static code analysis with the tool before shipping our code to production. When the integration is in the pipeline, this tool gives us early notifications on code fixes."
"The automation needs to be improved."
"As for what can be improved, definitely pricing. Customers look for pricing and ARCON is a little more expensive than Thycotic. So the pricing model could be improved."
"I would love to have all the products. Currently they have all the server operating systems and network operating systems but they should have all the other devices also included, like security devices. That's what I think is missing. They should also improve the license audit part. If I want to do a license audit from this tool, I'm not able to do it right now."
"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."
"Implementing a blackout time for any user or teams: Needs improvement."
"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."
"Checkmarx could be improved with more integration with third-party software."
ARCON Secure Compliance Management is ranked 36th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 11th in Vulnerability Management with 67 reviews. ARCON Secure Compliance Management is rated 8.0, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ARCON Secure Compliance Management writes "Great for productivity checking and provides good reports ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". ARCON Secure Compliance Management is most compared with , whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our ARCON Secure Compliance Management vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
