We performed a comparison between Apigee and SAP Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are scalability and technical support."
"If you have numerous applications and high traffic, Apigee is a strong choice for its excellent features and outstanding performance."
"The ease of creating policies has been the most useful of the solution's features. It's a quick ramp-up time. It's easy for our support staff to implement the policies in the API management layer."
"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."
"Anyone with basic knowledge can build an API."
"Apigee Analytics dashboard is useful to monitor transactions, error percentage, transaction latency, etc."
"Its flexibility allows seamless management of different products, showcasing scalability to handle extensive solutions."
"It's stable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."
"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."
"The technical support services are good."
"The solution could add even more functionalities."
"The company needs to better support webhooks. It used to support webhooks and their policies and they have since stopped. They had some issues in the product and they abandoned the support for them. It's not come back since."
"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."
"Apigee lacks market presence."
"Apigee is demanding on the infrastructure so the setup cost is very high for an on-premises deployment."
"Apigee on premise is quite complex and it is always moving faster."
"Apigee is not a solution compatible with public clouds, making it one of its shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Since it is based on various open sourced projects, we might have to depend on the fixes provided by those components rather than Apigee directly fixing the issues."
"The instances are costly."
"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."
"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."
"The product's UI could be faster."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while SAP Integration Suite is ranked 24th in API Management with 4 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while SAP Integration Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Integration Suite writes "Has many add-on services and supports different authentication methods ". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas SAP Integration Suite is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Axway AMPLIFY API Management. See our Apigee vs. SAP Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
