No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Amazon EKS vs SUSE Rancher comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.9
Qualys TotalCloud enhances efficiency, reduces costs by 30-40%, and increases ROI by 10-20%, significantly saving time and resources.
Sentiment score
4.0
Amazon EKS enhances cost-efficiency, time savings, and operational productivity with faster deployments and streamlined operations despite some cost challenges.
Sentiment score
6.4
SUSE Rancher offers quick ROI by reducing deployment costs and time, improving efficiency, and simplifying Kubernetes management.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
Security Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
CallStream helps us integrate and automate tasks.
Senior Security Consultant at CyberNxt Solutions LLP
Initially, not having them resulted in an unoptimized solution. However, with these tools in place, we witnessed a reduction of costs by approximately a third—if it was $100 beforehand, we brought costs down to $25.
DevOps Consultant at US Contract | Freelancer
We have cost explorer available, and a bill forecast based on usage allows us to determine whether resources are underutilized or overutilized.
Platform Software Engineer 4 at Nexthink
It's a fast deployment, with very good documentation, and it's really helpful.
Senior SOC Developer at XVE Security
For cost reduction, we save a lot on manpower; instead of hiring a 24/7 team to do the provisioning, we could just hire a couple of teams to monitor SUSE Rancher Management to do the provisioning.
GM Technical Management at PT. DATACOMM DIANGRAHA
Our team spends less time switching between clusters and performing respective administrative tasks.
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
It definitely saved time and manpower.
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Qualys TotalCloud's customer support is praised for expertise and responsiveness but occasionally faces response delays and inefficiencies.
Sentiment score
6.3
Amazon EKS support is valued for responsiveness and quality, particularly with premium plans, but varies with complex issues.
Sentiment score
6.8
SUSE Rancher's support is reliable and effective, with clear documentation reducing the need for frequent assistance.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Developer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Service Manager, Security Operations at CDA IT SOLUTIONS
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
Works at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We didn't need to manage etcd and those control management tools; it's totally handled from the AWS side, making it very beneficial.
Aws DevOps Engineer at Nova Techset Ltd
I believe there should be a recovery solution available for at least a few hours so that we might bring it back.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
They will set up a call, guide us, or provide solutions regarding integration with AWS or Amazon EKS.
Dev Ops Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
The customer support is very friendly, and they are very fast in addressing the issues.
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees
Since we were the partner for deployment, customer support was especially robust from the presales team at SUSE.
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
In one important case, we needed a license for SUSE Rancher and the key was not working. We contacted the SUSE support team and they helped us by providing a new key for our organization.
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Qualys TotalCloud excels in scalability but may need skilled management, adaptable for varying environments and large-scale deployments.
Sentiment score
5.6
Amazon EKS excels in scalability, efficiently managing high-demand workloads with minimal manual intervention, ensuring seamless upscaling and downscaling.
Sentiment score
7.6
SUSE Rancher is praised for its scalability and centralized management, efficiently handling growth and multiple clusters without issues.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
CIO at a venture capital & private equity firm with 11-50 employees
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
Analyst, Information Security at Infosys
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
retired at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The ability to scale based on requirements by deploying additional containers is a strong point for Kubernetes.
AWS Cloud Engineer at a tech services company
This allows us to scale our applications or APIs as needed, offering reliability through the automation of scaling processes.
DevOps Engineer | AWS and Terraform Specialist | Multicloud Experience at a agriculture with 11-50 employees
If any node is not ready, the cluster autoscaler ensures that it is removed from the AWS auto-scaling group and replaces it with a new node in the cluster.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
SUSE Rancher's scalability is working with high performance, and it can handle growth and additional clusters easily based on my experience.
DavOps at a university with 51-200 employees
It uses HPA in the backend, so horizontal pod autoscaling is by default inherited in SUSE Rancher.
Chief Executive Officer at a training & coaching company with 10,001+ employees
As the number of Kubernetes clusters grows, it helps provide a single place to manage all of them, so the operational overhead doesn't increase as much.
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Qualys TotalCloud is praised for stability, boasting 99.9% uptime with minimal downtime and quickly resolved minor bugs.
Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon EKS is highly rated for stability, offering robust performance, reliable control, and effective management across complex environments.
Sentiment score
8.4
SUSE Rancher is stable and reliable for cluster management, with occasional infrastructure issues but generally positive user experiences.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
Analyst, Information Security at Infosys
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
CIO at a venture capital & private equity firm with 11-50 employees
Continuous monitoring is crucial to ensure system stability and avoid vulnerabilities or threats.
Developer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
There are multiple availability zones in the regions, meaning no single point of failure.
Aws DevOps Engineer at Nova Techset Ltd
The control plane is quite stable in Amazon EKS, and I find it to be 100% available.
Administrator at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
We haven't faced any challenges, and it consistently delivers on its committed SLA.
Technical Lead at Cognizant
The tool is working fine with SUSE without any downtimes, technical issues, or critical errors.
Technical Architect at BORN Group
There are some areas where it can improve, such as on the stability and reliability side.
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees
We haven't faced any major downtime caused by SUSE Rancher itself.
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
 

Room For Improvement

Users recommend enhancing compliance, UI, integration, and reporting, improving security features, and optimizing pricing and navigation for Qualys TotalCloud.
Amazon EKS needs improved security, setup, UI, management tools, integrations, and documentation, with attention to cost and development efficiency.
SUSE Rancher faces challenges in performance, integration, UI, cost visibility, reporting, and documentation, needing significant improvements.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Analyst, Information Security at Infosys
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Project Lead at Persistent Systems
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
Senior Information Security Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Simplifying these will enable more people, not just those with strong foundational knowledge, to work effectively with these services.
AWS Cloud Engineer at a tech services company
Amazon EKS can be improved by having the maintenance of Kubernetes versions managed better, as everything is handled by the Kubernetes team and possibly a separate team at AWS.
Platform Software Engineer 4 at Nexthink
Adding logging would be a valuable improvement.
Senior SOC Developer at XVE Security
For complex scenarios such as air-gapped environments, disaster recovery, or multi-cluster upgrades, having more step-by-step examples and troubleshooting guides would be very helpful.
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
The most pressing issue that I found in SUSE Rancher is that it is a bit slow. Compared with Komodor, it is very slow.
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees
I wish the container could be more lightweight so that anyone can test and verify SUSE Rancher Prime.
Chief Executive Officer at a training & coaching company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Qualys TotalCloud is costly but offers value and integration, ideal for enterprises despite higher pricing.
Amazon EKS is competitively priced, with benefits for large-scale operations but potentially costly for small projects.
SUSE Rancher offers cost-effective, flexible pricing and licensing, with options for open-source use or support services.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
IT Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
Vice President at Inspira Enterprise
The EKS service itself is free, but you will incur costs for the VMs used as nodes in that cluster.
DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
If you want to monitor costs effectively, applying separate tools and acting accordingly in advance is essential.
DevOps Consultant at US Contract | Freelancer
I appreciate the overall pricing model of AWS, where you pay based on usage, which allows for a clear understanding of costs associated with services.
Senior DevOps Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Rancher is free of cost for us as it is open source.
Technical Architect at BORN Group
It is a very good tool to use, and it has a very good costing structure.
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees
Licensing, which is per unit based, was straightforward.
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Valuable Features

Qualys TotalCloud enhances risk management with misconfiguration detection, TruRisk integration, continuous monitoring, automation, and seamless integration for IaaS and SaaS.
Amazon EKS offers scalability, automation, and AWS integration, reducing maintenance with user-friendly deployment and robust security features.
SUSE Rancher offers open-source flexibility, centralized Kubernetes management, enhanced productivity, automation, and ease of use with effective governance.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
Works at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
Developer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The most beneficial aspect of Amazon EKS is that it helps manage the Kubernetes master node, so I don't need to maintain the master node, including tasks like upgrading.
cloud architect at selfstarter
The main benefits that I received from using Amazon EKS are that it is a managed cluster and offers simplicity.
System Engineer - EMEA at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
By default, if you just install Amazon EKS, you can deploy your application, but to have it enterprise-ready, you have to configure a number of other things that will boost productivity.
Platform Software Engineer 4 at Nexthink
We use Rancher Desktop for local development, testing APIs locally, and it helps to seamlessly publish to the cloud.
Technical Architect at BORN Group
SUSE Rancher has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to identify issues before they happen through monitoring utilizations and node pressure.
DavOps at a university with 51-200 employees
The openness helped in integrating the existing tools with SUSE Rancher itself, which was the biggest use case.
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualys TotalCloud
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (11th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (8th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (8th), SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) (2nd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (7th)
Amazon EKS
Ranking in Container Security
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
97
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (1st)
SUSE Rancher
Ranking in Container Security
16th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of Qualys TotalCloud is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Amazon EKS is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE Rancher is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Amazon EKS0.5%
Qualys TotalCloud1.6%
SUSE Rancher0.5%
Other97.4%
Container Security
 

Featured Reviews

RO
IT Security Expert at Alior Bank S.A.
Unified risk scoring has improved our cloud visibility and simplifies remediation priorities
Qualys TotalCloud provides unified vulnerability and threat assessment across both IAS and SaaS. This solution provides a single prioritized view of risk, which helps reduce the work I would have to do. We are no longer based on CVSS; we are based on Qualys risk scoring, which is based on CVSS plus internal findings made by Qualys, and then assigns its own score. The TruRisk insight feature has found a small number of assets with high vulnerability scores, though I am cautious since some information is classified. Qualys TotalCloud has positively impacted our bank's performance, and we have definitely seen benefits after implementing this solution.
Mahesh Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Consultant at US Contract | Freelancer
Has enabled seamless infrastructure configuration while improving identity integration and monitoring capabilities
It has been since 2019 that I started using Amazon EKS. At that time, it was completely new, and many people were not using it just yet; it started from version 1.21, and right now we are on 1.33. Recently, 1.34 has been launched, but it's not yet available in the service catalog; we can see only 1.33. A lot of improvements have been made. We had numerous add-ons to install manually because Kubernetes is a completely different service than AWS cloud provider, and everyone has opted to use it. After opting, there is an identity that you have to maintain—one at Kubernetes level and one at the AWS provider level. You have to maintain one identity at IAM level and one within the cluster, Amazon EKS. A few things do not make sense within the add-ons, many of the secret providers that read the secret from Secrets Manager and then mount it as a volume. We use a service called EBS CSI driver, which reads the secrets or sensitive data from Secrets Manager and then mounts it as a volume to the pod at runtime. However, that doesn't have a dynamic feature where, if any changes happen in the secrets, it can read and populate in the environment. Sometimes consider your RDS password or OpenSearch password rotates. Amazon EKS doesn't have that feature to read the dynamic one and consider that the password has changed overnight; there is no functionality from the provider to see the changes and then restart the pod or fetch the new value. This often leads to downtime of 12 or even 6 hours, depending on when you realize it, so that needs improvement. Nonetheless, mostly on the add-on side, they have developed a lot; earlier we were installing them manually, but now with EKS auto mode, many things VPC CLI and pod identity service—around four plugins—are installed by default, which is a good thing. However, I believe there should be some solution that is self-contained, covering generic use cases. With the 1.33 release, they have addressed most of my earlier concerns, but I am still looking for some improvements, particularly in CloudWatch monitoring. In IT, we manage two aspects: either the system or the application. Currently, the application logs and monitoring are not very robust in CloudWatch; you can only find things if you are familiar with them. Fortunately, we are familiar, as most of the monitoring involves two types of databases: one is a time series for monitoring data, and the other is an indexing solution for a streaming service. This means we need to get the logs from each node, index them, and populate them on a screen. That part remains a separate service, but if they managed it within Amazon EKS service, where the monitoring is consolidated in one place, you wouldn't need to rely on Prometheus, Grafana, or different services. It would be advantageous to have a consolidated platform for EKS, as Kubernetes is leveraged; monitoring and logging should also be integrated simply by enabling parameters or tags. This would create a self-contained platform where people can onboard and start using it. Currently, I still need to enable logging and monitoring among other things myself; that shouldn't be the case after six or seven years in the market. On a scale from 1 to 10, I would rate Amazon EKS tech support an eight. Some individuals have a deep understanding of the services and can identify potential bottlenecks, especially with load balancer endpoints and certificate management. The shift from NGINX to AWS load balancers has diminished many previous issues. However, not every support engineer meets the same level of expertise, hence why I rate it a solid eight, which I consider decent.
Shivamp Kachole - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate System Engineer at Dhanyaayai enterprise private limited
Centralized cluster management has improved daily operations and simplifies troubleshooting
I am happy with SUSE Rancher, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. During major version upgrades, the process can become a bit complex, especially in air-gapped environments where image management and dependencies require extra planning. Additionally, troubleshooting sometimes still requires switching to the command line because not every error is visible in the UI. If the UI provided more detailed diagnostic and troubleshooting information, it would make our issue resolution even faster. Other than that, it has been a reliable platform for all of us. I think the documentation is already very good, but for complex scenarios such as air-gapped environments, disaster recovery, or multi-cluster upgrades, having more step-by-step examples and troubleshooting guides would be very helpful. On the UI side, if SUSE Rancher could provide more detailed error messages and built-in diagnostic recognition, it would reduce the need to switch to logs and command lines. Those improvements would make our daily operations even easier and smoother, especially for new administrators and fresh team members.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Construction Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
26%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise31
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise49
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Qualys TotalCloud?
To be totally honest, I do not have any best features because I have had a bad experience using this tool, especially...
What is your primary use case for Qualys TotalCloud?
My main use case for Qualys TotalCloud is vulnerability management and exposure management. I use this tool to evalua...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EKS?
When purchasing Amazon EKS service for my application, if I have only one or two pods, I need to pay 75 dollars per m...
What needs improvement with Amazon EKS?
In a minor enhancement sense, I just needed some documentation on that, which has already been provided, but in simpl...
What advice do you have for others considering Amazon EKS?
Let me provide some additional context. Jenkins is one tool to consider. AWS DevOps is also available. For monitoring...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SUSE Rancher?
I wasn't directly involved in the commercial side such as pricing, negotiation, or licensing decisions. Since we are ...
What needs improvement with SUSE Rancher?
I am happy with SUSE Rancher, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. During major version upgrades, th...
What is your primary use case for SUSE Rancher?
I have been working in the DevOps field and platform engineering field for around two years, approximately 1.9 years....
 

Also Known As

Qualys TotalCloud with FlexScan
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
GoDaddy, Pearson, FICO, Intuit, Verizon, Honeywell, Logicworks, RetailMeNot, LogMeIn, Conde Nast, mercari, Trainline, Axway
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EKS vs. SUSE Rancher and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.