Microsoft System Center and Amazon CloudWatch compete in the field of IT management and monitoring solutions. Amazon CloudWatch seems to have the upper hand in AWS environments due to its native integration and comprehensive monitoring features.
Features: Microsoft System Center offers ease of configuration, strong monitoring capabilities, and automation for updates and hypervisor management. It integrates well within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering out-of-the-box functionality for many administrators. Amazon CloudWatch is known for real-time data collection, detailed metrics, and seamless integration with AWS services. It is simple to set up, scalable, and provides robust security features.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center could benefit from better integration with non-Microsoft products, streamlined installations, and enhanced reporting flexibility. It requires significant computing resources and could improve in user interface and mobile capabilities. Amazon CloudWatch faces challenges with real-time data visualization, lacks clarity in dashboard metrics, and experiences integration issues with non-AWS environments. Report functionalities and user-friendly configurations are potential areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center is primarily deployed on-premises or in hybrid environments, often requiring complex and costly technical support. Users seek more engagement and faster resolutions. Amazon CloudWatch, designed for public cloud environments, benefits from AWS support integration. However, customization and usage costs may be initial hurdles, but its cloud-native design simplifies deployment compared to Microsoft System Center.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is often criticized for high licensing costs but provides strong ROI by reducing dependencies on third-party services. Amazon CloudWatch offers a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, suited for cloud environments, with potential costs linked to data storage and usage. Many view CloudWatch as more cost-effective within AWS ecosystems.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
While using their cloud and cloud resources, if you have an issue with CloudWatch, you must pay additional monthly fees to get time from dedicated tech support.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
As a partner, I cannot create a ticket directly; I have to involve the end user's email to create one, so using the Software Assurance ID to create a ticket directly is not possible, making it very challenging for me.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
Microsoft System Center is scalable, allowing integration even if I have different sites.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
When using third-party dashboards such as Kibana or Grafana and other visualization tools, there should be a way to feed CloudWatch's data and logging capabilities into these visualization tools.
Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
The disadvantage of Microsoft System Center is related to the many integrated services; if one service is failing, then all features will be affected.
Overall, the pricing of Amazon CloudWatch is very expensive.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
Being an inbuilt solution from AWS, it saves time on installation, setup, and maintenance.
The best features of Amazon CloudWatch need to improve visibility into the network because when using hundreds of network resources such as transit gateway, VPNs, routers, route tables, and firewalls, it does not give many details in a structured manner.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
In Microsoft System Center, all the features are integrated already, whereas in ManageEngine, you have to license each feature individually to access those features.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Amazon CloudWatch | 2.3% |
| Microsoft System Center | 0.4% |
| Other | 97.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Amazon CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with AWS, providing real-time monitoring and alerting features. Its interface supports task automation, enhancing troubleshooting and analytics capabilities, while offering strong security and scalability at a cost-effective rate.
Amazon CloudWatch is an impactful platform for monitoring AWS resources and managing application performance. It simplifies infrastructure performance monitoring by providing comprehensive analytics capabilities, including application insights and event scheduling. Users appreciate CloudWatch for its detailed metrics, dashboards, and support in issuing alerts to detect anomalies. It efficiently tracks performance, optimizes resource utilization, and ensures service availability. CloudWatch is recognized for its robust alerting features and integration with other AWS services, further supporting its resource monitoring capabilities. However, there is room for improvement in dashboard customization, log streaming speed, and integration with non-AWS services. Enhancements in API integration, machine learning features, and support for third-party tools are also desired.
What features does Amazon CloudWatch offer?Industries implementing Amazon CloudWatch often focus on optimizing IT infrastructure. Companies in sectors like finance and e-commerce rely on its monitoring and alerting capabilities to ensure service uptime and performance. The platform's automation and analytics features empower teams to proactively manage performance and detect potential issues promptly.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
