Microsoft System Center and Amazon CloudWatch compete in the field of IT management and monitoring solutions. Amazon CloudWatch seems to have the upper hand in AWS environments due to its native integration and comprehensive monitoring features.
Features: Microsoft System Center offers ease of configuration, strong monitoring capabilities, and automation for updates and hypervisor management. It integrates well within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering out-of-the-box functionality for many administrators. Amazon CloudWatch is known for real-time data collection, detailed metrics, and seamless integration with AWS services. It is simple to set up, scalable, and provides robust security features.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft System Center could benefit from better integration with non-Microsoft products, streamlined installations, and enhanced reporting flexibility. It requires significant computing resources and could improve in user interface and mobile capabilities. Amazon CloudWatch faces challenges with real-time data visualization, lacks clarity in dashboard metrics, and experiences integration issues with non-AWS environments. Report functionalities and user-friendly configurations are potential areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft System Center is primarily deployed on-premises or in hybrid environments, often requiring complex and costly technical support. Users seek more engagement and faster resolutions. Amazon CloudWatch, designed for public cloud environments, benefits from AWS support integration. However, customization and usage costs may be initial hurdles, but its cloud-native design simplifies deployment compared to Microsoft System Center.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft System Center is often criticized for high licensing costs but provides strong ROI by reducing dependencies on third-party services. Amazon CloudWatch offers a flexible pay-as-you-go pricing model, suited for cloud environments, with potential costs linked to data storage and usage. Many view CloudWatch as more cost-effective within AWS ecosystems.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
While using their cloud and cloud resources, if you have an issue with CloudWatch, you must pay additional monthly fees to get time from dedicated tech support.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
When using third-party dashboards such as Kibana or Grafana and other visualization tools, there should be a way to feed CloudWatch's data and logging capabilities into these visualization tools.
Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
Overall, the pricing of Amazon CloudWatch is very expensive.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
Being an inbuilt solution from AWS, it saves time on installation, setup, and maintenance.
The best features of Amazon CloudWatch need to improve visibility into the network because when using hundreds of network resources such as transit gateway, VPNs, routers, route tables, and firewalls, it does not give many details in a structured manner.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.
Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.
What are the most important features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
