Alluvio AppResponse vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Riverbed and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Riverbed is ranked #57 with an average rating of 8.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Riverbed holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Alluvio AppResponse

Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews

1,334 Views
854 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 112 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

8,256 Views
5,614 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Alluvio AppResponse

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Alluvio AppResponse and PRTG Network Monitor are two strong contenders in the network monitoring industry. PRTG Network Monitor appears to have an edge due to its comprehensive feature set, although Alluvio AppResponse's strengths lie in its customer support and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Alluvio AppResponse provides robust performance analysis and detailed real-time troubleshooting with a focus on deep packet inspection. In contrast, PRTG Network Monitor offers wide-ranging monitoring capabilities, flexible alert systems, and an extensive availability of sensors, making it more adaptable in various network environments.

Room for Improvement: Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from expanding its feature set to be more competitive, as its focus tends mainly on packet inspection and diagnostics. Additionally, improving user interface design could enhance user engagement. PRTG Network Monitor could improve by streamlining the notification setup and expanding built-in integration capabilities. A more extensive library of pre-configured sensors would also be advantageous to users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is known for its straightforward setup process, which combines intuitive configuration with minimal time investment, making it accessible for quick implementation. In contrast, Alluvio AppResponse offers reliable customer services that ensure a smooth transition post-deployment, though the deployment process may require more effort compared to PRTG's easier setup.

Pricing and ROI: Alluvio AppResponse offers competitive pricing, presenting a satisfactory ROI over time with its cost-effectiveness being a key advantage. PRTG Network Monitor may incur higher initial costs but provides a better long-term ROI through its expansive and adaptable feature set, making it a more comprehensive solution for many network management needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,209 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

57th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (49th)

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 3.9%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PRTG Network Monitor	3.9%
Alluvio AppResponse	0.6%
Other	95.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic

Network and Security Unit Manager at Bankalararası Kart Merkezi (BKM)

It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels

I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."

"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."

"It provides us with complete visibility of every packet."

"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."

"We really like the scalability capabilities."

"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."

"AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture."

"Riverbed's product is a superb product."

More Alluvio AppResponse pros

"We have asked questions of their technical support and they have a very good response time."

"Speed of deployment is one of the most valuable features."

"I think net flow is PRTG's most valuable feature because it doesn't cost much for us because the net flow sensor is already included in the PRTG license. We can monitor our traffic in our proxy and router."

"It is easy when it comes to dependencies of devices, so if your router goes down, the three or four switches behind it will automatically be paused so that you don't get multiple alerts."

"The product is easy to use and the web interface is fantastic."

"Technical support has been very helpful so far."

"I would boldly say that this is the most scalable network monitoring tool that I know of"

"I found PRTG Network Monitor very useful for troubleshooting and monitoring the utilization of either the network or server."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance."

"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."

"Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."

"Technical support needs to be more responsive."

"The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually."

"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."

"They need to better integrate with products and solutions from different vendors."

More Alluvio AppResponse cons

"Sometimes, it is difficult to drill down further to get information, e.g., if we saw spike in traffic, then we would want to drill down and find out what is causing that spike in traffic."

"With custom sensors, there is a lot of work which needs to be done in the background, just for it to be tailor-made for the specific thing that we are actually monitoring. We take a lot of time with the custom sensors. I would like to see the customer sensor be more robust and a bit more varied."

"PRTG access works best from the web GUI. There are dedicated apps on Windows/Android/iOS, but they are slow and don’t work as well as the web GUI."

"PRTG Network Monitor needs to enhance network performance monitoring."

"PRTG's application monitoring sensor is not strong."

"They should work on syncing the solution with Gmail."

"Along with more room for automation, more room for advanced configuration can be integrated into the solution."

"The scalability of this solution could improve as well as the automated provisioning of the infrastructure."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."

"It is costly for small and medium businesses."

"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."

"The solution is no more expensive than other products."

"We are satisfied with the price."

"Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do."

"There is a license to use PRTG Network Monitor and it is annually."

"If you are not too sure about it, try the free version. Then, if you like it, you can go to the paid version and roll it out."

"I rate the price of PRTG Network Monitor an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a high price, and ten is a low price."

"PRTG Network Monitor is cheap."

"We used a product called SolarWinds in the past, and its cost was high. Whereas, PRTG came in at a third of SolarWind's cost."

"When you have a lot of devices, PRTG Network Monitor can be costly."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Performing Arts

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?

The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for PRTG Network Monitor is that it is reasonable.

See all answers

Comparisons

vRealize Network Insight vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 17% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 11% of the time

Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 10% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse

Compared 7% of the time

More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

October 2025

Download Alluvio AppResponse product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

October 2025

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert

No data available

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor

November 2025

Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.