We performed a comparison between Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and TestRail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, Microsoft, IDERA and others in Test Management Tools."It is a scalable solution."
"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."
"The program is very stable and scalable."
"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."
"Most valuable features are the ease of organizing test cases and a great API for sending results from automated test run results into the database."
"The integration with Jira and the ability for extra configurations are the most valuable features."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the dashboard."
"The API to support integration of the homemade automated testing tool."
"You don't need to follow complex procedures to create a test run, test case, etc."
"I haven't faced any stability issues using the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable features are the reporting in the dashboard and the general way in which we can create test runs is helpful."
"From a testing perspective, the management is awesome. I am able to do testing and then add the reporting and the evidence. It is fair in terms of the price that you're paying. You get what you're paying for."
"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."
"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."
"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr is take about 5-10 minutes."
"Better prediction of text."
"The TestRail API to integrate reporting of automated tests is complete, but requires many requests to identify the appropriate entry."
"It would be useful if it had its own issue management system. At the moment, it's purely a test management tool and you have to link to a defect management tool, like JIRA. It would be useful if there was an option to use its own defect management tool so that it's integrated and not two separate tools."
"It would be nice if they would add an export to Word."
"I have faced some issues with the integration between TestRail and Jira, which haven't been permanently resolved yet."
"It's not easy to create a custom report. It's not straightforward. A good improvement would be if there was a way to report and create a custom report without using a plugin or scripting language."
"With TestRail, the APIs are there, but they may not be able to easily integrate with the Jenkins."
"There are a number of improvements that have been requested. While I don't have a list of these requests available, many can be found on Gurock's forum."
More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Pricing and Cost Advice →
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while TestRail is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 21 reviews. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is rated 7.2, while TestRail is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira writes "Integrates with any automation tool, but the granular reporting feature should be more intuitive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TestRail writes "A tool that provides effective test management and real-time reporting capabilities". Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis Tosca and Tricentis qTest, whereas TestRail is most compared with Zephyr Enterprise, Tricentis qTest, TFS, Tricentis Tosca and Sealights.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.