

Acunetix and Rapid7 Metasploit are both prominent players in the security software market. Acunetix appears to have an edge with its user-friendly scheduling and detailed reporting, earning it a favorable spot for web application security. Conversely, Rapid7 Metasploit excels in terms of open-source benefits and script automation, making it a valuable tool for penetration testing enthusiasts.
Features: Acunetix offers Interactive Application Security Testing, seamless integration with other applications, and robust PCI DSS reporting. Rapid7 Metasploit is noted for its open-source framework, integration with InsightVM, and its extensive exploit library.
Room for Improvement: Acunetix needs to boost its testing module, address non-web environments, and reduce false positives. Pricing adjustments and ease-of-scan configuration are also areas for development. Rapid7 Metasploit's updates can be sluggish, while its limited browser exploits and the need for improved automation in vulnerability management are areas of concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides versatile deployment options alongside cloud support, with generally responsive technical aid. Meanwhile, Rapid7 Metasploit focuses on on-premises deployment and ticket-based support, implying a more traditional but reliable approach.
Pricing and ROI: Acunetix’s pricing structure can be high, affecting competitiveness, though users often see good ROI from enhanced security. Rapid7 Metasploit offers a budget-friendly pricing model with a free version, which is attractive for cost-sensitive users. The supportive community and depth of tool integration also enhance ROI.
It saves a significant amount of time by covering attack surfaces.
I have seen a return on investment, as Acunetix helps reduce the man-days and effort needed for scanning bulk applications through automated assessments.
I have seen a return on investment with Acunetix, including time saved and cost reduction, because it provides us threats on our web application servers.
Metasploit has helped save time, especially with testing websites or VIPD projects.
The ROI can be very rapid for organizations using vulnerability assessment for the first time.
For high-severity issues, they reach out within two to three hours, and for critical issues, a response is received within 15 minutes.
The technical support from Invicti is very good and fast.
Support staff not being familiar with the problem.
Rapid7 sometimes struggles with queries from non-security people, whereas Tenable is more patient.
The customer support is excellent
Acunetix can handle increasing workloads and more applications easily.
Acunetix's scalability for my growing needs is great; it is a very scalable product compared to others.
Metasploit can handle big projects and is already prepared for them.
Rapid7 Metasploit is highly scalable.
Rapid7 Metasploit has limited scalability based on my experience, as the customer receives the full functionality of the product with the license.
I did not need to reach customer support because the product is very stable.
I have never faced any technical issues or downtimes.
I find Metasploit to be very stable, and I would rate its stability as a nine out of ten.
The main concern is related to false positives; Acunetix needs to work on identifying valid and invalid findings.
Acunetix should have better integration with newer tools such as GitHub and Azure DevOps.
I believe Acunetix can improve customer support, as the dedicated support staff are often unfamiliar with problems and troubleshooting, leading to communication gaps that delay issue resolution.
While you can check the vulnerability, and the system will tell you there is no vulnerability, usually, a human can change one, two, or three parameters and using the same technique and the same scripts can break the system.
The database is not always updated with the latest vulnerabilities or zero-day exploits.
The time taken to fetch reports based on the number of events can be extensive.
The pricing cost is affordable for small and mid-sized organizations, and when compared to Checkmarx, it is significantly affordable, as Checkmarx is quite expensive.
We secured a special licensing model for penetration testing companies, which is cost-effective.
The pricing of Acunetix is pretty expensive and could be improved.
The cost is approximately $15 per device.
Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for studying Metasploit.
After that, they usually purchase the commercial part of the solution due to its deep integration with InsightVM.
Its most valuable role is in enhancing security by identifying potential vulnerabilities efficiently.
The solution is excellent at detecting SQL injection and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.
The best feature Acunetix offers is the centralized dashboard and the quality of reports it generates, which includes various options for selecting reports and developer options for directly sharing the reports with developers.
Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.
InsightVM searches for potential threats and vulnerabilities of the infrastructure, and after that, Rapid7 Metasploit validates whether we can break the system using this vulnerability or threat, serving as a validator component of the InsightVM solution.
The most valuable features of Metasploit include its powerful capabilities for exploitation and scanning.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Acunetix | 1.1% |
| Rapid7 Metasploit | 1.5% |
| Other | 97.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 17 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.
Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.