Actifio vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup comparison

Google and IDERA are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Google is ranked #49 with an average rating of 8.0, while IDERA is ranked #87. Google holds a 0.3% mindshare in BRS, compared to IDERA’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 33% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Actifio

Read 8 Actifio reviews

671 Views
456 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Read 3 IDERA SQL Safe Backup reviews

206 Views
127 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Actifio

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Both Actifio and IDERA SQL Safe Backup are widely used data protection solutions but cater to slightly different needs and preferences. Actifio stands out for its pricing and customer service, while IDERA SQL Safe Backup excels in its features and overall value.

Features: Actifio is praised for its comprehensive data virtualization capabilities, enabling efficient data management and backup. It also offers seamless scalability and robust disaster recovery options. IDERA SQL Safe Backup is noted for its robust data compression and encryption features. It also provides automated backup policies and advanced recovery options.

Room for Improvement: Actifio users suggest enhancements in reporting, analytics functionalities, and better integration with third-party tools. Additionally, some users mention the need for improved user interface design. IDERA SQL Safe Backup users mention the need for a more intuitive setup process, better documentation, and enhanced scheduling flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Actifio users find deployment straightforward and commend the excellent support team, contributing to a smooth setup experience. In contrast, IDERA SQL Safe Backup has a steeper learning curve during deployment, though users still find its customer service responsive and helpful.

Pricing and ROI: Actifio is generally considered more cost-effective, with users noting favorable ROI due to its pricing model. IDERA SQL Safe Backup, despite being perceived as more expensive, is viewed as worth the investment because of its advanced features and reliable performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Actifio

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

49th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Data Management (7th)

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

87th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Actifio is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA SQL Safe Backup is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Anil-Sinha

Senior Consultant at CGI

Actifio enables quick and efficient data refreshes

The product is scalable. However, to ensure optimal scalability, you need to work on the underlying hardware and resources. For example, if your network has limited bandwidth, you need to identify and address the bottlenecks by increasing resources. The product is designed to be scalable, but it requires attention to the underlying resources to ensure sufficient capacity. For example, they have the appliance on a given server. And that server would work till a certain stage. Then if you see that the resources are low or have reached the capacity, you have to next level of the VM, like, in terms of if there is a memory or CPU or from the appliance to wherever you are hosting, wherever you are presenting that virtual disk, that network traffic, if you see that network traffic is reaching capacity, then you have to add additional. So it's scalable from the design perspective, but you have to work on the underlying resources to make sure they also have that capacity.

Read full review

it_user386274

Database Administrator at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

You can't see any metrics about how long it took you to backup the entire server. We've had a huge reduction in the nightly backup footprint size.

Idera treats a backup of a SQL Server as if it is essentially a single backup job of each individual database. You can't see any metrics about how long it took you to backup the entire server. It doesn't handle restoration to different drives very easily, and it won't create folder structures if they don't exist already. It cannot be used to implement replication on another instance without first converting files back into SQL Server .bak files. There appears to be LOTs of shortcomings. [All of these short-comings are still very much present even after 6 months of feedback to Idera. No solution is in sight.] Still has a focus on individual databases and not for entire server recoveries. Have tried adjusting max threads values, but it seems to have little affect and Idera is still researching the issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Actifio was very stable. Whenever they identified bugs, they would promptly provide us with patches."

"The solution helps reduce costs."

"They will assist me in achieving whatever budget issue the client may be having."

"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."

"This product has unique capabilities that lead the product category in test data management, cloning and recovery."

"Very user-friendly and the QSA is very good."

"It has reduced our backup time and simplified our backup processes across all the servers."

"The compression, because it drastically reduces the disk space."

Cons

"Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version of the tool."

"Lacks the option to price backup costs within the solution itself."

"The initial setup is complex."

"Areas that need improvement would be the support for recovery in the physical environment."

"The solution doesn't support AIX software or in-cloud, and we have a lot of servers running on AIX and Oracle."

"While the product does support various databases, the company needs to make more of an effort to support N-minus-one compatibility."

"I would like to see the pieces that they have put in the web only to be put into the thick client sitting on the desktop client."

"The way the filtering goes, if you filter on your view, there is no indication that you have made a selection."

"Make sure you check your backups on a regular basis. Backups do get missed with this tool, for whatever reason."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues."

"Pricing is on a case by case basis."

"Actifio is cheaper than other tools."

"The product's pricing is a good value. They have a straightforward licensing model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

19%

Retailer

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Actifio?

The solution helps reduce costs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Actifio?

Actifio is cheaper than other tools. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Actifio?

The product must provide AI features. Google has stopped supporting the on-premise version of the tool.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Actifio

Compared 43% of the time

Perforce Delphix vs Actifio

Compared 31% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Actifio

Compared 26% of the time

More Actifio Competitors

Rubrik vs IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Compared 100% of the time

More IDERA SQL Safe Backup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Actifio

May 2025

Download Actifio product report

Buyer's Guide

IDERA SQL Safe Backup

April 2025

Download IDERA SQL Safe Backup product report

Also Known As

No data available

SQL Safe Backup

Overview

Actifio is the world’s leading Enterprise Data-as-a-Service (EDaaS) platform. It enables thousands of users around the world to deliver their data just as they deliver their applications and infrastructure… as a service available instantly, anywhere. An enterprise-class software platform powered by patented Virtual Data Pipeline™ technology, Actifio frees data from traditional infrastructure to accelerate adoption of hybrid cloud, build higher quality applications faster, and improve business resiliency and availability. For more, visit Actifio.com or follow us on Twitter @Actifio.

Google

SQL Safe Backup helps database administrators to back up and recover instantly across SQL Servers. Unlike its competition, it provides virtual databases with access to back up files without consuming disk space, instant restore, centralized management across SQL Servers, and alert notifications for success and failure of operations.

IDERA

Sample Customers

IBM, Waste Industries, Nasdaq, Verizon, Sharp, Rosetta Stone, Dakine, JBS Australia, Texas Wesleyan University, Cintra, People's Choice Credit Union, Lotto NZ, Electric Insurance, Tyler Technologies, Intility, Corporate One Federal Credit Union, Bryant University, pc/nametag, Isagenix, Sungard Availability Services, Databank, Electrocraft, Lifescript, Westfleisch, Interstate National Corporation, RestorePoint, Net3, Access Community Health Network, Newmarket International, Rezolve Group Inc., Piri Reis University, MC Assembly, Grass-Merkur, dbMotion, Christian Broadcasting Network, Bezeq, Abilene Christian University, CNW Group, Softcat, Migliori, City of South Portland, NaviSite, News-Press & Gazette, Comtec, Equity Insurance, Admirals Bank, Assistra, Dassault, Henry Davis York Lawyers, SAI Global, Audax Group, DSM, Triad Retail Media, Euronet Worldwide, Palm Beach County School District, iGate, Emerald Queen Casino

Woman's Hospital; Sisters of Mercy Hospital System; University Medical Center; MetTel; PPG Industries; 3M; Abbott Laboratories; Comcast; Daimler; GameStop; Hormel Foods; Marriott International; Merck; NCR; United Technologies; City of Lynnwood; Linfosys B.V.; TRI-KES; American Customer Care; Merck & Co., Inc.; Service Corporation International; Fresenius Vascular Care Inc.; Bates White; TechPro Inc.; TW Metals, Inc.; Tulane University; ISO Group; Ameriben Solutions; Instron Corporation; Sentric, Inc.; SPIE; GAS Distribution Company of Thessaloniki and Thessaly SA; American Printing House for the Blind; Paysafe; Freeman Decorating Services, Inc.; Sentric, Inc.; Auburn University; Corporate Communications Group; Sagicor Financial Corporation; Crystal Run Healthcare; Principality Building Society; Experiencias Xcaret; Missoula County; Shellpoint Partners LLC; Solix Inc.; Advicent Solutions, Inc.; Phoenix Newspaper Inc.; Park Place Technologies; Kelly & Associates Insurance Group; Boston Medical Center; Service Corporation International; eResearchTechnology, Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup

April 2025

Free Report: Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup

Find out what your peers are saying about Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Actifio vs. IDERA SQL Safe Backup report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.