ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub vs Make comparison

ACI Worldwide and Make are both solutions in the Process Automation category. ACI Worldwide is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0, while Make is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3. ACI Worldwide holds a 0.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Make’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ACI Worldwide users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Make users who would recommend it.

ACI Worldwide Global Paymen...

Read 1 ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub review

178 Views
173 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Make

Read 4 Make reviews

360 Views
353 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ACI Worldwide Global Paymen...

Make

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub and Make based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,170 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACI Worldwide Global Paymen...

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Make

Ranking in Process Automation

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Make is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Prabhash Ray

Pre-Sales Consultant at Capco

Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model

This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model. And then, this solution's time to market. So they are generally the first ones to deploy any regulatory changes.

Read full review

Yaniv Ivgi

Business Owner at Chatbot-sales

An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation

Make has a single IP. We cannot use a single IP because of the security. There are a lot of crashes when you work manually. Also, they need to provide more models. When you have an error, Make should inform them with guidance before you make the mistake. There is a lot of data you can confuse.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."

"Make saves a lot of time, and I have created really complex scenarios in Make."

"The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."

"Make's front-end interface, the modular interface that it has, drag-and-drop interface, is very easy to understand, use, and integrate."

Cons

"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

"Make can be a bit difficult to use for new users, but for someone with technical knowledge and some coding skills, it becomes manageable, especially with Make's great UI features that really help."

"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."

"The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

"The price of Make is approximately $20 per month for the platform."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?

I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?

There is a scope for improvement in this solution's support mechanism, like the solution's SLAs for tickets and incidents. Another area of improvement is setup. It could be made easier.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?

I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing costs of Make to be reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Make?

Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be cl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Make?

Some of the very simple use cases that people use Make for is AI-powered content creation. That is where we help them out with different kinds of content creation and social media posting, differen...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Camunda vs Make

Compared 57% of the time

Appian vs Make

Compared 29% of the time

Tray.io vs Make

Compared 14% of the time

More Make Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub report

Download ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

June 2025

Download Make product report

Also Known As

Worldwide Global Payments Hub

Integromat

Overview

ACI Universal Payments for a real-time hub is a modern, flexible solution that enables you to deliver consistent, scalable, real-time banking services across a variety of payment types, channels, networks and currencies.

ACI Worldwide

Visualize everything you do

Make lets you visually build workflows to solve complex problems - the way you imagine them in your mind.

Drag and drop to connect apps
Use the playful drag-and-drop builder to connect apps in a few clicks, and build workflows called scenarios.

Design infinite workflows
Build scenarios with as many steps or apps as you need.

Watch data flow in real time
Build your scenario and watch it run in real time. Schedule your scenario to run instantly or whenever you need it.

Make

Sample Customers

Charles River Investment Management Systems, T-Mobile,Time Warner Cable, Thomson Reuters, Fidelity.com, Texas Instruments, Sears, Sabre Holdings, First Data, HP, IBM, Johnson Controls, Jefferies

Buan Consulting, Armadia

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.