Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub vs F5 BIG-IQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ACI Worldwide Global Paymen...
Ranking in Process Automation
32nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
F5 BIG-IQ
Ranking in Process Automation
23rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub is 0.1%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of F5 BIG-IQ is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

PR
Robust cloud model support and offers competitive pricing with a pay-per-use model
This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model. And then, this solution's time to market. So they are generally the first ones to deploy any regulatory changes.
AshutoshMalik - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless migration enhances user management for data center administrators
The product is excellent. It is easily manageable and user-friendly for administrators working on both the GUI and CLI. The best part is the seamless migration of the configuration from one box to another, even when hardware changes. This is particularly beneficial during migrations from old boxes to new ones. While other vendors might have issues, F5 BIG-IQ ( /products/f5-big-iq-reviews ) provides a smooth transition.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing model."
"The customer service is great."
"The reporting feature is quite good."
"F5 BIG-IQ has always provided us with great support."
"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."
"We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."
"The most valuable features are load balancing and WAF."
"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."
"It is quite good in a large environment where I have multiple devices; it is easy to manage the devices."
 

Cons

"The initial setup of medium complexity. So, there is room for improvement to make it better."
"There are a lot of scripts available on the internet for people who know how to use them, but with a graphical interface, it would be easier for new users."
"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."
"F5 BIG-IQ is a complex solution, and it cannot manage everything related to BIG-IPs."
"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."
"The shell, kernel, or Linux has something like a delay, especially with the Virtual Edition, when you are trying to implement it in the cloud and you want to access it remotely with web management. It would be great if they could improve their kernel. It was difficult for me, especially when I got started with BIG-IP. I was struggling to find which commands work with it. If you want to work with it, you have to be a Linux guy."
"F5 BIG-IQ should improve by being a complete certificate management solution because currently, it is only for Venafi. Other automation platforms, should be added."
"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."
"A bug caused me to lose all the configuration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"I would like the product to be cheaper."
"Users have to pay an annual subscription fee for the solution's iSeries."
"There is only one licensing fee for F5 BIG-IQ and everything is included in the price."
"F5 BIG-IQ is a cheap solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?
This solution has a robust cloud model, which it supports, and the pricing is also very competitive in terms of pay-per-use. Right now, it seems like ACI is winning a bit in terms of its pricing mo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?
I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with ACI Worldwide Global Payments Hub?
There is a scope for improvement in this solution's support mechanism, like the solution's SLAs for tickets and incidents. Another area of improvement is setup. It could be made easier.
What do you like most about F5 BIG-IQ?
F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP.
What needs improvement with F5 BIG-IQ?
The product is really good with no significant downsides. However, better and simpler integration with ACI could improve the product.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Worldwide Global Payments Hub
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Charles River Investment Management Systems, T-Mobile,Time Warner Cable, Thomson Reuters, Fidelity.com, Texas Instruments, Sears, Sabre Holdings, First Data, HP, IBM, Johnson Controls, Jefferies
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Pega and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2025.
851,042 professionals have used our research since 2012.