Control-M and F5 BIG-IQ are both utilized within enterprise IT environments; however, they focus on distinct areas. Control-M specializes in automation and workflow scheduling across diverse technologies, which may provide an advantage for organizations with complex, multi-platform needs. Conversely, F5 BIG-IQ excels in managing multiple F5 BIG-IP devices, making it ideal for network and application delivery management.
Features: Control-M stands out with its cross-platform support, robust scheduling capabilities, and integration with numerous third-party applications like AS400. It is praised for its easy scheduling of complex workflows and significant integration abilities. F5 BIG-IQ specializes in centralized management of F5 BIG-IP devices, focusing on load balancing capabilities and WAF functionalities, which make it an excellent tool for network and application delivery management.
Room for Improvement: Control-M users express the need for enhanced reporting features and more flexible output analysis. They also request better customization options and improvements in the integration of certain modules. On the other hand, F5 BIG-IQ users would benefit from reduced user management complexity and improved automation processes. A more intuitive GUI for security rule configuration and decreased deployment complexity, especially in cloud environments, are desired.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud setups. It generally receives good support feedback, though complexity in integrations may affect support quality. F5 BIG-IQ operates mainly in on-premises and private cloud environments, with strong technical support, though users note challenges in engaging support teams and navigating technical details.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is known for its high costs due to a job-based licensing model, yet it provides comprehensive functionality that leads to significant time savings and operational efficiencies, yielding a positive ROI for large enterprises. F5 BIG-IQ, while more cost-effective with device-based licensing, offers great value within the F5 ecosystem, though its limited functional scope may affect ROI in broader use cases.
Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.
Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.
F5® BIG-IQ® Centralized Management provides a unified point of visibility and control for the entire F5 portfolio, ensuring administrators remain aware on the pulse of F5 devices, modules, and licenses and enabling them to deliver optimal application availability, performance, and security.
BIG-IQ manages policies,licenses, SSL certificates, BIG-IP images, and configurations for F5 appliances and for the following BIG-IP moduals across hardware and virtual editions:
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
