Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ABBYY Vantage vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.1
Automate boosts efficiency with 30% more productivity, saving 200 hours monthly and reducing costs without needing consultants.
Sentiment score
6.9
ABBYY Vantage enhances efficiency by automating document tasks, improving ROI, job satisfaction, and large-scale deployment value.
Sentiment score
7.6
Pega Robotic Process Automation delivers an ROI of 2 FTE benefits per robot and boosts profits by 7.5% for clients.
Fortra's Automate has effectively replaced the workload of an entire employee, saving us significant time and money.
Our improvement has been approximately 30% in productivity since implementing this tool.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.5
Automated customer support is highly rated for quick responses and expertise, though some find the knowledge base lacking.
Sentiment score
6.7
ABBYY Vantage support varies in responsiveness and cost, with mixed feedback on timeliness, communication, and technical guidance.
Sentiment score
6.5
Pega RPA improved with knowledgeable support and global availability, though complex issues may require longer resolution times.
They don't always understand the processes I'm trying to implement.
I rate the technical support 10 out of 10 because it provided excellent service during implementation and when we were connecting with different services.
I would rate the technical support as a nine out of ten because it is quite fast and courteous.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Automate is praised for scalability and cost-effectiveness, yet faces challenges with complexity and operating system support.
Sentiment score
7.1
ABBYY Vantage scales well for various business sizes but faces performance challenges at higher scales, requiring potential upgrades or configurations.
Sentiment score
6.8
Pega RPA is scalable and adaptable, though experiences vary; cloud solutions ease expansion, and integration enhances flexibility.
It is easy to increase one bot or one studio without needing to buy another orchestrator, which can be quite expensive.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Automate version 11 is stable and reliable, with occasional slowdowns reported, scoring 7 to 9 out of 10.
Sentiment score
7.9
ABBYY Vantage is generally stable with minor bugs; performance varies by configuration and hardware, with good support responsiveness.
Sentiment score
7.9
Pega Robotic Process Automation is stable and reliable, with resolved past issues, relying on strong infrastructure and proper planning.
It has very robust features, and it is not prone to instability.
It is very reliable.
 

Room For Improvement

Automate needs improved web automation, UI, security, OCR, stability, documentation, integration, user experience, community support, and cloud functionality.
ABBYY Vantage users face integration challenges, desire enhanced language support, intuitive interfaces, lower costs, and better documentation.
Pega RPA needs improvements in integration, OCR, UI, and cloud expansion for better competitiveness and user efficiency.
Integration with Amazon S3 is somewhat lacking.
I would prefer not having to log in to update a ticket; being able to respond via email would be beneficial.
I find that most important features are strong, however, there is a lack of good development for artificial intelligence, such as machine learning.
Simplifying workflow creation by chatting with the system rather than dragging and dropping elements would make the platform more user-friendly, especially for non-technical users.
Based on our use cases, handwritten recognition for Arabic is not supported.
The vendor invoice processing skill of ABBYY Vantage could be enhanced by adding more fields that are commonly used across multiple invoices.
 

Setup Cost

Automate offers flexible and competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with options for unlimited bots and reasonable costs.
ABBYY Vantage's pricing is costly for small users; discounts available for large-scale deployments, with extra support and installation costs.
Pega RPA offers competitive enterprise licensing mainly for Fortune 500 firms, with US pricing affecting global regions like APAC.
Competitors are often more expensive than Automate.
It offered what we wanted at a good, competitive price.
It does a lot but also costs a lot.
There are other solutions available at a lower cost.
I would say the pricing is in the middle.
 

Valuable Features

Automate offers a user-friendly interface for easy task automation with efficient features, Azure integration, and cost-effective scalability.
ABBYY Vantage offers accurate OCR with multilingual support, user-friendly interface, AI integration, and flexible deployment for automated processing.
Pega RPA offers a user-friendly platform with strong automation, integration capabilities, and robust technical support, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
Other features I appreciate about Automate include business processing automation, intelligent documentation, and restrictive processes.
The most valuable features of Fortra's Automate include its FTP functionality and file manipulation capabilities.
ABBYY Vantage has AI features that learn automatically about invoice fields and related functionality.
ABBYY has a very good OCR in both Arabic and English.
The AI capabilities facilitate querying and document classification, and they have good post-processing capabilities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Automate
Sponsored
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ABBYY Vantage
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (1st)
Pega Robotic Process Automa...
Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
20th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category, the mindshare of Automate is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ABBYY Vantage is 1.4%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pega Robotic Process Automation is 3.3%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Anabel Marco - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates processes efficiently with cost-effective scaling and robust customer support
Web scraping is quite good since it offers a lot of possibilities. Another important feature for me is its compatibility with MBI, the Power that is ISEQUADO Centers. I appreciate the ability to scale and increase the number of bots or studios without additional expense. Automate's non-reliance on additional orchestrators makes it quite cost-effective.
Amr Hammad - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables efficient information extraction with strong OCR capabilities
The solution itself is valuable due to its ability to classify and extract information with embedded OCR, which is good. ABBYY has a very good OCR in both Arabic and English. Additionally, they have a new version called Vantage, which is cloud-based. However, we still work with the old version because most of our clients are government entities.
VISHNU VARDHAN CHENNURU - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable
Excel connectors need to be improved as there are a few connectors in Excel areas. The recording is not at best in Pega Robotics. They could look into it. The interactions with some applications, like Windows and web applications, are a little slow. They need to improve their speed. It should be normal, to open it with other tools. However, right now, it's a little hard. Users should feel they can develop easily. It will sometimes hang while interacting with third-party applications. Instead of adapters, if we had direct interaction of the applications with API and had scripts, that would be better. We have only CSharp supported right now. We'd like to have Python supported. If it was, it would be easier for us and make the solution more flexible. Currently, we are adding three different configuration files, however, if I had the option, I'd prefer to make a single configuration file and then differentiate it in all three environments. It can be difficult to create logic in automation. It's hard than if we used other RPA tools. If they could add more toolbox options, that would be ideal. They need to do what they can to help us reduce complexity in the automation and combine things under, for example, a single control.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
5%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HelpSystems AutoMate?
We use it for specific cases, mainly secure file transfers, which are vital for us. And it works for us.
What is your primary use case for HelpSystems AutoMate?
I am a consultant and I am making a lot of processes in human resources, payroll, certifications, trainings, web scra...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortra Automate?
The pricing is quite good compared to its competitors. Competitors are often more expensive than Automate. I would ra...
What do you like most about ABBYY Vantage?
Vantage is flexible and customizable. It's a low-code/no-code tool, so you don't need to get into detailed coding. Yo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ABBYY Vantage?
I would say the pricing is in the middle. It's neither high nor low.
What needs improvement with ABBYY Vantage?
The vendor invoice processing skill of ABBYY Vantage could be enhanced by adding more fields that are commonly used a...
What do you like most about Pega Robotic Process Automation?
The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pega Robotic Process Automation?
I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
What needs improvement with Pega Robotic Process Automation?
The solution's configuration and settings could be more comprehensive.
 

Also Known As

HelpSystems Automate, Automate
ABBYY FlexiCapture
Pega RPA, OpenSpan
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aldergrove Financial Group, Preferred Health Professionals, Mindbeam Technologies, First Credit Union in British Columbia, Vestcom International, Prime Liberty Benefits, University of Tampa, CNLBancshares, World Precision Instruments, BJ's Restaurants, Globe Pequot Press, Accudata Technologies, Norton Healthcare, Pacific Toxicology Laboratories
NHS,  Carlsberg,  DHL,  Societe Generale,  Citi bank,  Deloitte,  3M,  Volkswagen,  Adidas,  PwC Browse through our customer stories.
eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about ABBYY Vantage vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.