No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

A Cloud Guru vs Adobe Captivate comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

A Cloud Guru
Ranking in eLearning
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Training (1st)
Adobe Captivate
Ranking in eLearning
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Publishing Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the eLearning category, the mindshare of A Cloud Guru is 5.6%, down from 14.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Adobe Captivate is 2.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eLearning Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
A Cloud Guru5.6%
Adobe Captivate2.2%
Other92.2%
eLearning
 

Featured Reviews

Upendra Kanuru - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud DevSecOps Engineer at USAA
Focuses on practical skills for cloud and DevOps learners
A few improvements I can think of for A Cloud Guru would involve moving beyond the traditional installation approach to a hands-on experience within terminals. Furthermore, I believe the technology space is shifting towards AI chatbots, so incorporating training on effectively using chatbots for information retrieval would be beneficial. Instead of just providing a help note, offering prompts that assist in learning and solving coding exercises could greatly improve the learning process, as many of us now use chatbots to obtain detailed answers to advance our development. Regarding pricing, I suggest A Cloud Guru could be more competitive. I compare it with other educational platforms, some of which offer corporate discounts, and I notice that many companies opt for those, while the organizations I have worked for have not utilized an A Cloud Guru corporate account, which presents a challenge. I am unsure about the marketing aspects, but other platforms I see have corporate versions, and I can create an account, which I have not seen as an option here. Given that these courses are very specific and tailored to cloud, I assume the pricing might be somewhat higher, which could make it challenging for every company to invest in them.
reviewer2814465 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Cloud Cost Over And Visibility Parts at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Interactive e-learning creation has transformed our training and now delivers measurable time savings
I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between team members when working on Adobe Captivate projects. We track learner progress and performance using Adobe Captivate through the reporting feature that Adobe Captivate provides to manage this information. We are using the latest version to manage version control for Adobe Captivate projects. There is a process we follow to handle content updates or revisions in Adobe Captivate once a course is published to keep the materials current. I am unaware of how to ensure content created in Adobe Captivate is accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I appreciate most about A Cloud Guru is that we have many lessons and practice opportunities, with a user-friendly interface that allows us to practice cloud technologies."
"The hands-on labs are really helpful."
"A Cloud Guru offers courses for any industry. It is a user-friendly platform that offers courses in Excel, Python, C#, and more."
"A Cloud Guru is very focused on the tech stack I am interested in, such as the cloud and DevOps space, which provides a comprehensive view of what associates want to learn specifically."
"The content is very easy to understand because they break it down in a way that anyone can understand."
"The content is engaging."
"The solution's lab feature is good and offers hands-on experience. It is easily accessible."
"It has streamlined my knowledge of cloud migration strategies, particularly in managing public and private cloud environments and hybrid setups."
"The most valuable features are the templates that come with the package, the recording features, as well as the surveys and quizzes that you can create with it."
"It helped us bring in-house what would have otherwise been extremely costly projects."
"Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T"
"The most valuable features are the templates that come with the package, the recording features, as well as the surveys and quizzes that you can create with it, and I also like the content library."
"Since using Adobe Captivate, I have noticed specific outcomes and improvements in my organization, including saving time and cost, and we have saved approximately 15 to 20% in time and cost after using Adobe Captivate."
"Automatic responsive designs allow us to not have to code for any eLearning modules."
"It helped us bring in-house what would have otherwise been extremely costly projects."
"We use Adobe Captivate 5.5 with Adobe Technical Communication Suite 3.5 to produce technical how-to videos."
 

Cons

"A Cloud Guru should incorporate fewer updates."
"A Cloud Guru's videos are not effective for knowledge transfer."
"I would appreciate more interactive features where users can receive immediate feedback on their actions."
"There is room for improvement in the portal. It can be more user-friendly."
"Sometimes it gets stuck or takes time to execute; if that could be sped up, that would be the only improvement needed."
"Instead of covering a broad section of the exam and then offering labs, it would be better to provide targeted exercises right after the relevant lecture, such as creating an EC2 instance."
"The solution could work on their marketing and advertising. Many people know about platforms like LinkedIn Learning, Udemy, and Coursera, but I only learned about A Cloud Guru through my company. They could focus on making their product more widely known."
"Most of the tutorial contents in A Cloud Guru are very lengthy."
"I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects."
"I would love a quick widget which walks novices through the process along with descriptive output options."
"I would love to see a "For Dummies" option. It gets pretty extensive in its level of intricacies and options offered."
"Getting started with Captivate has been a struggle for two of us on our team."
"The voice sounds automated and I would like to have a more natural-sounding voice."
"The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old."
"I would love to see a "For Dummies" option. It gets pretty extensive in its level of intricacies and options offered."
"The text to speech capability needs to be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You need an annual license to use the platform. Its pricing is fine—good knowledge comes at a price—and doesn't include any extra costs."
"The pricing is good compared to other premium e-learning platforms."
"A Cloud Guru is more expensive than other options on the market."
"It is not expensive."
"I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"The solution's cloud content is expensive. Compared to other vendors, it is expensive."
"This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eLearning solutions are best for your needs.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A Cloud Guru?
I would want to get the current costing for personal use if I want to opt for A Cloud Guru courses and modules.
What needs improvement with A Cloud Guru?
A few improvements I can think of for A Cloud Guru would involve moving beyond the traditional installation approach to a hands-on experience within terminals. Furthermore, I believe the technology...
What is your primary use case for A Cloud Guru?
My use cases primarily involve working as a Cloud DevOps Engineer, and I use A Cloud Guru for GCP, Google Cloud Practitioner, data engineering certification, and I currently have my AWS Cloud Pract...
What needs improvement with Adobe Captivate?
I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects.
What is your primary use case for Adobe Captivate?
My main use case for Adobe Captivate is to create interactive e-learning content including training courses, software simulations, and quizzes.
What advice do you have for others considering Adobe Captivate?
I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Captivate
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo
Find out what your peers are saying about A Cloud Guru vs. Adobe Captivate and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.