Cloudability Reviews

Entities leveraging Cloudability observed significant cost savings, particularly in reserved instances. Teams reported annual savings of substantial sums, with one estimating around $400,000. A notable percentage reduction in budget expenditure was attributed to its usage. A reported 9x return covered license and personnel costs over a year. Additionally, Cloudability facilitated easier reporting, resulting in time savings. Despite AWS offering similar functionalities, Cloudability enhanced efficiency and financial benefits for its users.

Enterprise users describe Cloudability as having justifiable costs, with a pricing model based on usage. Many find the pricing straightforward and the setup process seamless. However, organizations with smaller budgets find it expensive, as costs scale with consumption. Users appreciate purchasing through AWS Marketplace for its intuitiveness. Although some deem prices high, others view them as cost-efficient, highlighting that larger consumption leads to higher costs. Overall, Cloudability is seen as a valuable investment despite being costly for some.

• "The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."
• "Cloudability is a bit expensive."
• "It justifies the cost and is worth it."

Organizations primarily use Cloudability for cost management and optimization across AWS and Azure platforms. It provides billing insights, helps analyze resource utilization, and facilitates right-sizing and tagging for detailed cost tracking. Cloudability integrates financial processes, enabling multi-cloud cost management in a centralized manner. Companies benefit from enhanced transparency and streamlined operations, using features like EC2 analysis and cloud memory metrics for efficient cloud expenditure management within FinOps practices and yearly forecasting.

Customers have mixed experiences with Cloudability's support. Some find their technical support helpful and quick, appreciating the regular meetings with the professional services team and timely assistance. Others note challenges, such as inconsistency and reliance on email for communication, lacking online chat or phone options. A few mention issues with backup practices and the need for frequent data updates. Overall, while some praise the support's responsiveness, others suggest an overloaded team and inadequate communication channels.

Users found Cloudability's initial setup with AWS easy and integration straightforward due to available resources like IAM roles and trust policies. However, those using large environments or integrating with Azure faced complexity, sometimes requiring third-party assistance. Small environments saw quick, straightforward deployment. Documentation was beneficial, and API integration provided reliability. Initial phases were generally seamless, but the complexity increased with larger structures needing detailed planning regarding data access, account privileges, and security considerations.

Cloudability scales efficiently for various users and organizations, handling large datasets and diverse environments. Some users report excellent scalability with no performance issues, while others see areas for improvement, such as more resource support and faster report generation. Users appreciate the SaaS environment's auto-scaling capabilities, although some find features limited compared to alternatives. Cloudability's ability to manage numerous accounts and regions is generally well-regarded, but scalability ratings vary among users.

Cloudability is highly stable, with most users experiencing no issues. Many rate its stability between seven and nine out of ten. It handles reports effectively and minimal downtime is reported. Some find it stable enough even during outages, noting it does not affect business productivity significantly. It remains reliable for organizations using it in both single-cloud and multi-cloud environments.