Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs Cloudability comparison

BMC Helix and Apptio are both solutions in the Cloud Cost Management category. BMC Helix is ranked #35, while Apptio is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7. BMC Helix holds a 1.3% mindshare in CCM, compared to Apptio’s 7.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BMC Helix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Apptio users who would recommend it.
BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...
Read 2 BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reviews
  • 546 Views
  • 300 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Cloudability
Read 16 Cloudability reviews
  • 1,765 Views
  • 1,712 Comparison Views
77% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization and Cloudability compete in cloud management and cost optimization. Cloudability seems to have the upper hand due to its superior financial management and multi-cloud capabilities, while BMC Helix is appreciated for its intuitive analytics in resource allocation.

Features: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization offers capacity management, predictive analytics, and performance management to enhance operational efficiency. Cloudability provides financial management tools, including budgeting, forecasting, and cost allocation for better financial control.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization provides efficient deployment and strong customer support, making it accessible for enterprises. Cloudability provides flexible deployment options with various integrations but may require a more significant time investment to learn.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization usually has a higher setup cost but provides long-term value through operational efficiency. Cloudability offers a competitive setup cost with strong ROI due to focused cost management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BMC Helix Continuous Optimi...
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
35th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), IT Operations Analytics (27th)
Cloudability
Ranking in Cloud Cost Management
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cloudability is 7.1%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Cost Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Cloudability7.1%
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization1.3%
Other91.6%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Appperf677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Appperf677
Application Performance Mnagement Specialist at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Enables us to right-size systems to free up resources, and identify performance problems down to the process level
Since I already have a sneak peek into the next releases, I'm very happy about what's going to be included. I would like to see continued support for the legacy parts of the tool, the old, seasoned parts that are very valuable to me. That is a message I continue to give to BMC: All the new stuff's great, but don't take away this really important stuff. That's my biggest fear, that I might lose some of my old functionality that is still extremely valuable. I want to make sure we don't lose any functionality, and that they just still keep delivering on what they're doing. I don't have anything more to ask than what they're offering.
Read full review
reviewer2784351 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2784351
Digital Marketing, Marketing Technology & Analytics Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Gained clear cost visibility and forecasting but still needs finer insights using resource tags
Cloudability offers excellent features including trends, graphs for cost utilization, and forecasting capabilities. The forecasting feature has helped me understand how the resources are utilized and how the cost is burned, and then I use it to make changes to keep the cost in control. Cloudability has positively impacted my organization as it helps us understand cost utilization, make corrections, and understand the forecasting of the cost. It has made reporting much easier.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Workload characterization is super important because it lets us figure things out. Many people know, for example, that with Microsoft Word, Word.exe is the executable. Everybody knows their executable, but they don't always know what it does. It also launches other things. This tool has the ability and insight to track those things, and to know: "Oh, you wanted this executable, but this one started this, so you must want this, too." And it tells you what it had to add, what it was using or was spawning."
"We ingest a ton of business data. We are an insurance company and we have business data, like how many quotes are done an hour, and how many policies are sold per hour. The correlation engine in the new TrueSight Capacity Optimization components are wonderful. We can do correlation analysis over months of data, and then we run models to tell our business: 'If you do 1,000 more quotes an hour, we're going to have to upgrade, and we're going to need this much more hardware.'"
"The most interesting feature is certainly the simulation of the load using different servers or different KPI parameters of the business."
"All the tagging and mapping, which helps to create some virtual tags are useful features."
"The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."
"Cloudability's customizable alerts help me maintain budgetary goals by providing recommendations and alerts on slot usages."
"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."
"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."
"Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."
"Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."
"The support from IBM is fantastic"
More Cloudability pros
 

Cons

"The memory management of Java application servers should be implemented to be able to size GC and footprint."
"Some of the data management is painful. Some of the new features haven't been implemented in quite the way I would like to get to levels of detail. For example, Visualizer parser doesn't take everything it should out of the Visualizer files. We've had to put in a work-around, but the work-around is not as accurate as what's in the file."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"They can improve the custom range of the network."
"Enhancements could be made in the user interface and customization, and leveraging GenAI would be an area for improvement in Cloudability."
"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."
"There are also some limitations with the dashboards and data representation in Cloudability."
"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
"I would like the API functionality to improve. The update time after uploading data could also be improved."
More Cloudability cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Right now, the licensing structure is by server. Everybody is licensed somewhat differently, depending on how big they are, how many licenses they have."
"Cloudability is a bit expensive."
"It justifies the cost and is worth it."
"My team is one of the most expensive teams, and we look at it quite a bit. We have probably easily saved around $400,000 USD a year."
"We have seen ROI with the reserved instances, and having the ability to predict what reserved instances you can get. We can save tens of thousands of dollars, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases."
"The price of the license or the usage is a percentage of the top consumption. So it varies from year to year."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Energy/Utilities Company
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise12
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Cloudability?
The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Clouda...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudability?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was adequate, but it could be made better.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cloudability?
It would be beneficial if we could use resource tags to provide more fine-grained visibility.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 31% of the time
OpenText Cloud Optimizer vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
OpenText Cloud Optimizer vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 18% of the time
Precisely Capacity Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
Precisely Capacity Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 18% of the time
ITRS Capacity Planner vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
ITRS Capacity Planner vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 18% of the time
DX Performance Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Logo
DX Performance Management vs BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
Compared 14% of the time
More BMC Helix Continuous Optimization Competitors
Apptio One vs Cloudability Logo
Apptio One vs Cloudability
Compared 21% of the time
IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudability Logo
IBM Turbonomic vs Cloudability
Compared 9% of the time
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability Logo
VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs Cloudability
Compared 8% of the time
Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability Logo
Azure Cost Management vs Cloudability
Compared 7% of the time
Harness vs Cloudability Logo
Harness vs Cloudability
Compared 6% of the time
More Cloudability Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. DX Performance Management
December 2025
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization reportDownload BMC Helix Continuous Optimization product report
Buyer's Guide
Cloudability
January 2026
Cloudability reportDownload Cloudability product report
 

Also Known As

BMC Capacity Optimization, TrueSight Capacity Optimization, BMC Helix Optimize, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization
No data available
 

Overview

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is a comprehensive performance and capacity management solution designed to help enterprises optimize IT resources, enhancing operational efficiency while managing costs effectively.

It provides predictive analytics and modeling capabilities, allowing businesses to meet evolving demands seamlessly. By proactively identifying resource constraints and predicting future trends, BMC Helix Continuous Optimization assists organizations in aligning IT resources with business objectives. This strategic approach ensures optimized performance, resource allocation, and cost management with enhanced insights.

What are the key features of BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

  • Predictive Analytics: Utilizes advanced algorithms to forecast future resource requirements.
  • Capacity Planning: Facilitates strategic planning to manage capacity effectively.
  • Anomaly Detection: Identifies unusual patterns that could impact performance.
  • Customizable Dashboards: Provides insights with tailored views for better decision-making.

What benefits can be expected from BMC Helix Continuous Optimization?

  • Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource usage to lower operational costs.
  • Increased Efficiency: Enhances productivity by aligning resources with demand.
  • Improved Forecasting: Accurate predictions help with strategic planning.
  • Risk Mitigation: Early detection of performance issues reduces downtime.

BMC Helix Continuous Optimization is leveraged by industries like financial services, healthcare, and telecommunications to ensure resource efficiency. These sectors benefit from predictive modeling and capacity planning capabilities, enabling them to adapt to fast-changing conditions while maintaining optimal performance.

BMC Helix

Cloudability is a financial management tool for monitoring and analyzing every cloud expense across any organization. It brings transparency to how and where organizations spend money on cloud resources, giving them the power to reap the most value from cloud usage possible. It aggregates expenditures into accessible and comprehensive reports, helps identify new opportunities for reducing spend and increasing cloud efficiency, offers budget alerts and recommendations via SMS and email, provides APIs for connecting cloud billing and usage data to any business or financial system, and more.

Apptio
 

Sample Customers

Dilliard's
Adobe, Uber, Pega, imgur, Pixable, Blackboard, Keboola, Avalara
Buyer's Guide
BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability
December 2025
Free Report: BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our BMC Helix Continuous Optimization vs. Cloudability report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.