Top 10 Check Point DDoS Protector Alternatives

Vendor: Check Point Software Technologies

4.0 out of 5

13 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Check Point DDoS Protector Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Check Point DDoS Protector based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Imperva Application Security Platform, and Arbor DDoS. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Check Point DDoS Protector surpasses its competitors by offering real-time network protection, automatic traffic filtering, and seamless integration with existing security infrastructures, ensuring robust defense against large-scale DDoS attacks while maintaining network performance.

Check Point Software Technologies Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Check Point Software Technologies, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare offers affordability with a scalable model, CDN performance, and essential security features suitable for varying business sizes. In comparison, Check Point DDoS Protector delivers advanced SSL decryption and multi-layered protection, appealing to businesses requiring sophisticated security and willing to invest more.

Download Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Cloudflare Report

Pricing

Cloudflare has low setup costs, emphasizing cost-effectiveness, while Check Point DDoS Protector involves a higher initial investment for enhanced capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare has low setup costs, emphasizing cost-effectiveness, while Check Point DDoS Protector involves a higher initial investment for enhanced capabilities.

Imperva Application Security Platform

4.3 out of 5

Imperva Application Security Platform

4.3 out of 5

Imperva excels in application security with features like correlated attack validation, while Check Point DDoS Protector focuses on effective DDoS mitigation with low latency. In comparison, tech buyers may choose Imperva for precise threat intelligence, while Check Point offers robust defense against unknown threats.

Download Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Imperva Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

The Imperva Application Security Platform typically involves lower setup costs compared to Check Point DDoS Protector, making it more cost-effective at the initial stage. However, Check Point offers robust features justifying its higher setup expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Arbor DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Arbor DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Check Point DDoS Protector is favored for comprehensive support and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Arbor DDoS is preferred for advanced analytics and scalability. Both offer solid protection, with Arbor's features appealing to organizations with complex needs, while Check Point ensures easier deployment and ROI.

Download Arbor DDoS vs. Check Point DDoS Protector Report

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has a higher setup cost than Arbor DDoS, making it more suitable for organizations with larger budgets, while Arbor DDoS provides a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has a higher setup cost than Arbor DDoS, making it more suitable for organizations with larger budgets, while Arbor DDoS provides a more budget-friendly option.

Akamai App and API Protector

4.2 out of 5

Akamai App and API Protector

4.2 out of 5

Check Point DDoS Protector offers efficient network layer defense with straightforward on-premises deployment for intensive DDoS protection. In comparison, Akamai App and API Protector excels in application security with a cloud-based model, providing scalability and flexibility for multi-layered protection.

Download Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector Report

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector is noted for its straightforward setup costs while Akamai App and API Protector's setup costs are slightly higher, reflecting their complex configurations. These differences highlight distinct approaches to initial cost management.

View comparison

Pricing

Radware DDoS

4.4 out of 5

Radware DDoS

4.4 out of 5

Check Point DDoS Protector excels in threat intelligence and integration, attracting security-conscious buyers. In comparison, Radware DDoS offers advanced behavioral analysis and real-time monitoring, appealing to those needing strong protection. Radware's rapid deployment contrasts with Check Point's personalized but detailed setup.

Download Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Radware DDoS Report

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has cost-effective setup options, while Radware DDoS involves higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has cost-effective setup options, while Radware DDoS involves higher initial expenses.

Fortinet FortiDDoS

4.1 out of 5

Fortinet FortiDDoS

4.1 out of 5

Check Point DDoS Protector offers flexibility with adaptable defense mechanisms and ease of integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiDDoS provides robust performance and excellent technical support, appealing to buyers prioritizing high-performance threat mitigation and scalability despite the higher investment.

Download Check Point DDoS Protector vs. Fortinet FortiDDoS Report

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiDDoS, which is known for its higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Check Point DDoS Protector has a lower setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiDDoS, which is known for its higher initial investment.

Related categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

CDN

Managed DNS