Akamai App and API Protector vs Check Point DDoS Protector comparison

Akamai and Check Point Software Technologies are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. Akamai is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.7, while Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. Akamai holds a 4.2% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Check Point Software Technologies’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 29 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

4,306 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Check Point DDoS Protector

Read 12 Check Point DDoS Protector reviews

604 Views
604 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Check Point DDoS Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Check Point DDoS Protector and Akamai App and API Protector are competing products in the cybersecurity domain. Akamai App and API Protector has the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value despite higher pricing, while Check Point DDoS Protector is noted for its cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Check Point DDoS Protector offers proficient threat detection, firewall integration, and advanced threat protection. It includes network-layer proficiency and advanced threat mitigation. Akamai App and API Protector provides comprehensive security layers, app-focused defense, API protection, and advanced threat analytics, with detailed application and API-oriented solutions.

Room for Improvement: Check Point DDoS Protector could enhance its application-layer security and scalability. There is room for improvement in customization options and integration flexibility. Akamai App and API Protector might improve in terms of cost-efficiency, user interface simplicity, and broader support for on-premise deployments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point DDoS Protector is known for straightforward on-premise deployment and effective technical support that aids operational integration. Akamai App and API Protector offers flexible cloud-based deployment, ideal for seamless integration without altering existing infrastructures, emphasizing flexibility and scalability.

Pricing and ROI: Check Point DDoS Protector is recognized for lower initial setup costs and a cost-efficient model that promises a good return on investment. Akamai App and API Protector, although more costly, justifies its price point with superior features offering significant long-term value, reflecting its focus on comprehensive feature enhancements.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,255 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (16th), Cloud and Data Center Security (14th)

Check Point DDoS Protector

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 4.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point DDoS Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Akamai App and API Protector	4.2%
Check Point DDoS Protector	1.0%
Other	94.8%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has provided strong protection against evolving threats but still needs support for configuration fine-tuning

The standout features of Akamai App and API Protector are rooted in it being the Web Application Firewall, where all traffic gets scanned, including the implementation of web firewall rules, and after this phase, traffic proceeds through the BMP, which is Bot Management. Akamai App and API Protector exceeds expectations in terms of AI capabilities, and it genuinely combines a plethora of advanced features. The area in which Akamai excels compared to other competitors with a WAF is in threat intelligence, as threats continually evolve, requiring ongoing updates to backend algorithms to effectively capture smart bots, and Akamai's commitment in that regard is backed by an excellent team, while other providers are still catching up.

Read full review

reviewer2753559

Cyber Security Solution Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Ensures service availability and handles attacks effectively though initial setup needs expertise

The best features that Check Point DDoS Protector offers, which stand out to me the most, are real-time detection and mitigation of application-layer DDoS attacks, easy integration with the existing Check Point security infrastructure, and low latency protection that does not disrupt legitimate traffic. The centralized console makes it easy to manage policy across devices, and the integration is straightforward since it works seamlessly with Check Point firewall and management and other security products. Check Point DDoS Protector has positively impacted my organization by improving uptime, reducing incidents, and providing cost savings. It will reduce the incidents up to 30%.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"All the solution's features are very good."

"The product has a good user interface."

"The most valuable feature is the DDoS protection, which is the main reason we got it."

"The CDN and the WAF features are the best."

"The product is user-friendly."

"It enables us to move faster with new products because we have this layer of protection set up in our infrastructure."

"Adaptive stream delivery and WAF protection are valuable."

"The product has a good UI."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"This product uses auto-learning and behavioral analysis to establish baselines for legitimate traffic, and automatically detects and blocks traffic behavior that does not conform."

"Check Point detects and automatically mitigates attacks, which helps our organization protect our infrastructure."

"It uses several layers of security."

"It can be deployed as a hardware appliance, virtual appliance, or as a cloud service."

"The initial setup takes two hours."

"Check Point DDoS Protector is a product that uses machine learning and behavior analysis."

"The is a really low level of the false-positive alerts (when the clean traffic is marked as DDoS) due to some advanced techniques used by Check Point under the hood."

"One of its most outstanding functions is the zero-day DDOS."

More Check Point DDoS Protector pros

Cons

"The WAF features definitely have a lot of room for improvement. A lot of the WAF is really basic. For some products or some of our solutions, we need to run a second layer of more advanced WAF. If it had better layer seven protection then we would not need a second WAF."

"In terms of precedence of Akamai rules, the last one is implemented. That is the one that is operational. If two rules contradict, the last one is implemented. We had a clash, but it was really tough to find that out. I would like to have a rulebook because, in their architecture documentation, it is not mentioned anywhere that if two rules clash, the last one works, and if it does not work, then what to do. This is something we were debating today with their tech support. With AWS, we get documents for the issues so that they do not occur in the future. Akamai's support and knowledge base needs to be improved."

"The effectiveness of Akamai's bot management in reducing unauthorized access is quite good, although it does require a lot of fine-tuning and tweaking, which involves spending ample time with their support teams to tailor the configuration to our applications."

"The product should provide a secure NTP."

"There are some issues with pushing configurations across a network. It still takes about 20 minutes and that means to retract it's another 20 minutes."

"The interface is a little bit clunky and can be improved."

"If we talk about application layer attacks, including WAF, CloudFlare is leading. Akamai can focus a bit more on the application layer attacks and how to protect them."

"The solution could offer even more integrations."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"Check Point DDoS Protector does not provide the ability to upload data for the blacklist/whitelist in bulk, which is one of the big points that need to be improved to facilitate configurations."

"Check Point DDoS Protector can be improved in that initial fine-tuning of policies can be complex and may require expertise."

"The mitigation part could be improved."

"It does not provide the capability to upload data for blacklisting/whitelisting in bulk."

"The product is expensive."

"I would like applications for Android and IOS where we can follow the events, and, if necessary, make changes."

"For a long time, there was no software version of R80.10 available for the Check Point DDoS Protector software appliances, and we had to stay on the quite outdated R77.30 version."

"Check Point should develop a DDoS solution because they don't have one and we need to use another solution, in our case, Imperva. This is a problem because we need to have two firewalls. We would like to only have one solution because it would improve the management, we would have fewer incidents, and we wouldn't need to talk to more than one person for support."

More Check Point DDoS Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Price-wise, I would say Akamai's pricing is competitive."

"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."

"Akamai is very expensive."

"The solution is expensive."

"Its price is at the medium level. It is not very high. It is also not very low. It serves the purpose."

"The product is expensive, but it is worth the money."

"It's more expensive than others, but the ROI is good for large-scale infrastructure."

"If you want quality, you have to pay the price. Its price is fair. Their account managers are also very helpful. They help you a lot with pricing even though they are working with Akamai."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"It's an expensive solution. It's one of the most expensive solutions in the world. It's cheaper than Palo Alto and Cisco but these are expensive solutions. Fortinet is cheaper."

"The appliance comes with a loaded hardware license, and additional options such as SSL can be purchased and enabled."

"I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the DDoS database for new attacks and so on."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Comms Service Provider

35%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The price is higher than others. It could be about 80% to 70% more expensive than other tools. So, it’s not just a slight difference.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

There are no significant areas for improvement on the WAF side or for Akamai App and API Protector solution; they are comprehensive in their current state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The main use case for Akamai App and API Protector is serving as the WAF, Web Application Firewall.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point DDoS Protector?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is straightforward with no challenges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Check Point DDoS Protector?

Check Point DDoS Protector can be improved in that initial fine-tuning of policies can be complex and may require expertise. Additionally, reporting and analytics could be more detailed and customi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Check Point DDoS Protector?

My main use case for Check Point DDoS Protector is to protect our network perimeter against DDoS attacks, ensuring service availability and application layer attack in real time. I can give you a s...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cloudflare vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Prolexic vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Radware DDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 29% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 18% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 14% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare vs Check Point DDoS Protector

Compared 9% of the time

More Check Point DDoS Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

January 2026

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point DDoS Protector

January 2026

Download Check Point DDoS Protector product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

No data available

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Modern DDoS attacks use new techniques to exploit areas that traditional security solutions are not equipped to protect. These attacks can cause serious network downtime to businesses who rely on networks and Web services to operate. DDoS Protector Security Appliances and Cloud DDoS Protection Services block destructive DDoS attacks before they cause damage
Learn more about Ddos Protector.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

Boston Properties

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector

December 2025

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Check Point DDoS Protector report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.