No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
BMC AMI DevX Logo

BMC AMI DevX pros and cons

Vendor: BMC
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

BMC AMI DevX enhances productivity by streamlining documentation and improving the efficiency of developers through automation and features like code completion.
The integration of BMC AMI DevX with Eclipse provides stability and extensive functionality, making it highly valuable for developers familiar with the environment.
The debugging capabilities of BMC AMI DevX, particularly with Xpediter, enable developers to effectively troubleshoot and step through their code, enhancing the quality and reliability of their work.
Compuware provides excellent support, paying attention to customer requests and integrating enhancements which contributes to the satisfaction and confidence in the use of BMC AMI DevX among users.
BMC AMI DevX facilitates efficient deployment management and standardization with features like ISPW, reducing deployment time and ensuring tight control over application releases.

CONS

Audit trail and vendor collaboration are lacking, making it difficult to track mainframe developer activities and to know what combinations will work.
Topaz Workbench and associated plugins often face compatibility issues with other plugins and current Eclipse releases.
Technical support issues arise, with bug fixes sometimes introducing new bugs, and a cumbersome setup process requiring clearer guidance.
Pricing concerns are significant, with substantial price increases noted for BMC Compuware File-AID, making it less financially viable for some users.
Documentation needs improvement for easier troubleshooting and understanding of tools like deployment and database structure setup.
 

BMC AMI DevX Pros review quotes

Wisdom Mbiza - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Engineer at Absa Group
Jun 23, 2026
I think BMC AMI DevX has provided overall benefits and a positive impact because I've seen a lot of developers, not just the new developers, but even the old developers who have used the green screen their entire life, also developing with BMC AMI DevX and migrating into the newer screen.
FI
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Apr 29, 2026
BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is a solid product that any company can benefit from if they want to have tight control and a standard way of deploying applications into production in a secure manner.
JZ
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
May 20, 2026
BMC AMI DevX tools have noticeably impacted our developers' productivity and efficiency.
Learn what your peers think about BMC AMI DevX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
903,182 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PM
Developer at Selfemployed
Jul 2, 2024
Test data management capabilities are good.
Brian Westerman - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.
Jan 30, 2024
The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development.
RS
Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS
Feb 29, 2024
BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.
BM
Sr Consultant Project Manager with 10,001+ employees
Jan 20, 2022
One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing.
reviewer1247103 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Jan 11, 2023
I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management.
reviewer1449762 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 29, 2021
I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout.
reviewer1449762 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dec 9, 2020
I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I.
 

BMC AMI DevX Cons review quotes

Wisdom Mbiza - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Engineer at Absa Group
Jun 23, 2026
BMC AMI DevX's logging in feature is not so great. Furthermore, the startup of BMC AMI DevX takes a long time to start up before it loads.
FI
Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees
Apr 29, 2026
The only thing that bothers me about BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is the screen movement.
JZ
Mainframe Modernization Co E & Transformation Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
May 20, 2026
While I am aware of the possibility to integrate Git with BMC AMI DevX zAdviser, this integration does not fit within our solution landscape.
Learn what your peers think about BMC AMI DevX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
903,182 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PM
Developer at Selfemployed
Jul 2, 2024
It's a very complicated tool.
Brian Westerman - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.
Jan 30, 2024
We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates.
RS
Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS
Feb 29, 2024
One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution.
BM
Sr Consultant Project Manager with 10,001+ employees
Jan 20, 2022
When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?
reviewer1247103 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Jan 11, 2023
The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment.
reviewer1449762 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jun 29, 2021
Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement.
reviewer1449762 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dec 9, 2020
Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs.