No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BMC AMI DevX pros and cons

Vendor: BMC

4.0 out of 5

20 reviews
91% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

BMC AMI DevX accelerates documentation processes and enhances stability but struggles with plugin compatibility and testing tool integration. Topaz Workbench integrates with Eclipse, offering valued debugging capabilities. BMC Compuware ISPW enhances code management, saving manhours. Xpediter supports various languages, including COBOL. Despite its superior support and feature enhancements, BMC AMI DevX's price increases and occasional support issues concern users, necessitating documentation clarity to ease troubleshooting.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

BMC AMI DevX accelerates documentation processes and enhances stability once configured and deployed.

Topaz Workbench offers seamless integration into Eclipse, valued by developers for its debugging capabilities and features like ISPW, which improves control in parallel development.

BMC AMI DevX is recognized for superior support, listening to customer requests and incorporating enhancements that streamline operations like CICS NEWCOPYs and Db2 binds.

Compuware Xpediter stands as a top debugging tool for mainframe software, efficiently supporting various languages such as COBOL.

BMC Compuware ISPW is appreciated for robust features in code management and deployment, easing mainframe data management and saving manhours with its file editing and cloning abilities.

CONS

BMC AMI DevX often lacks compatibility with other plugins, leading to integration issues.

Documentation improvements are needed to enhance clarity and ease troubleshooting.

The insufficient integration of testing tools makes them less intuitive compared to other development environments.

Technical support has room for improvement, as updates sometimes introduce new issues.

The price of BMC AMI DevX has significantly increased, creating cost concerns for users.

BMC AMI DevX Pros review quotes

FI

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Apr 29, 2026

BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is a solid product that any company can benefit from if they want to have tight control and a standard way of deploying applications into production in a secure manner.

Read full review

PM

Patricio-Martinez

Developer at Selfemployed

Jul 2, 2024

Test data management capabilities are good.

Read full review

Brian Westerman

Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.

Jan 30, 2024

The product has made our mainframe data management process easier. It has helped us save manhours. The tool's most valuable feature is the ability to edit tape files. Its ability to clone files is beneficial in application development.

Read full review

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about BMC AMI DevX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RS

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Feb 29, 2024

BMC Data Management improved our data recovery process by simplifying it.

Read full review

BM

Sr Consultant Project Manager with 10,001+ employees

Jan 20, 2022

One of the features that the developers like is that they can retrieve what they need with the tool. They don't have to go through some process or request something be done by another team. They can get the programs they need, compile them, retrieve the JCL and alter the JCL if they need to, and put these programs wherever they need to go for their testing.

Read full review

reviewer1247103

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jan 11, 2023

I think the most valuable features are code management, code deployment, and code generation. The fact that those three features are included makes BMC Compuware ISPW a robust product. If one of those features was missing, it would be less robust and less interesting. But because it has those three features, it is a very good solution for code development and management.

Read full review

reviewer1449762

IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jun 29, 2021

I like the ability that it has to format copy books in a presentable manner. So, you will be able to see the starting offset in length of each field within the layout.

Read full review

reviewer1449762

IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2020

I like the ability to flow through the source and see what happens to the data as the statements are executed. If there is a fault, it will track the event, and we can then look back to see why it may have caused the fault. You can also reverse engineer your test. You can set it so that you can go backward as well as forward in your test. This is something that I haven't done here at my company. Compuware Xpediter is one of the best debugging tools for mainframe software development. We have currently licensed only the COBOL language for Xpediter, but I know they have other languages, including Assembler, PL/I.

Read full review

HC

HEVERSON CAMPELO

Information Technology Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Nov 5, 2020

I have worked with DB2's great features in the last five years. The IDAA feature transformed the vision of warehousing, business analytics, and big data at my bank. Besides the mainframe, I saw that this solution was evolutionary. It gives real-time information.

Read full review

JW

Technical Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 16, 2021

The smart editor helps because it will code-complete for me. I can see code working a lot faster and I'm able to get things coded in less time.

Read full review

Show 9 more reviews (out of 19)

BMC AMI DevX Cons review quotes

FI

Abulfazal Irfan

Devops Engineer / Ispw Admin at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Apr 29, 2026

The only thing that bothers me about BMC AMI DevX Code Pipeline is the screen movement.

Read full review

PM

Patricio-Martinez

Developer at Selfemployed

Jul 2, 2024

It's a very complicated tool.

Read full review

Brian Westerman

Director of R&D at Syzygy Inc.

Jan 30, 2024

We plan to replace BMC Compuware File-AID due to its price. Two years back, we paid 11,000 dollars. However, the current price is 27,900 dollars. The price has increased to at least eight times its initial cost. We would need to pay around 60,000 dollars to have all three products together. We also encountered issues during version updates.

Read full review

Free Report: BMC AMI DevX Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about BMC AMI DevX. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.

892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RS

Technical Consultant at Services Robert Samson SCRS

Feb 29, 2024

One area for improvement with this product could be in providing clearer guidance and tools for disaster recovery planning and execution.

Read full review

BM

Sr Consultant Project Manager with 10,001+ employees

Jan 20, 2022

When you're setting up the parameters for how ISPW will work in your shop, there are a lot of questions that have to be answered... BMC Compuware should have more in-depth explanations about what the choices in each question mean. If you pick A, what does that mean has to happen? What does that impact? If you pick B, what does that mean? What does that impact?

Read full review

reviewer1247103

CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jan 11, 2023

The solution could be improved by being better integrated with the open world. In the next release, I would like to have the ability to work in an open environment whilst remaining integrated with the legacy environment.

Read full review

reviewer1449762

IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Jun 29, 2021

Technical support has gotten better over the years, though there's always room for improvement.

Read full review

reviewer1449762

IT Developer III at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Dec 9, 2020

Their technical support could be better. There were times where, when we reported bugs, they would fix one bug but add another one. That's probably because of their support model. A lot of organizations are developing software using Agile rather than the Waterfall method, so things are happening all over the place. You get things quicker, but sometimes one fix will break another one or add other bugs.

Read full review

HC

HEVERSON CAMPELO

Information Technology Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Nov 5, 2020

DB2 is a hard tool to grasp. It's hard for users to learn how to use it. It's not easy to see how it works.

Read full review

JW

Technical Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Mar 16, 2021

I'm waiting to see what 19.2 for Topaz looks like, but I have a problem with the JES Explorer right now. It limits you to a certain prefix for job names and there are some groups that have multiple prefixes that they'd like to see all at once in their job names, because of how they work in a group. And they can't see that in the JES Explorer.

Read full review

Show 9 more reviews (out of 19)

Related questions

30

When evaluating Test Data Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

59

Looking for recommendations for a service contract to de-identifiy patient data in databases.

48

CA TDM vs. Delphix TDM

62

Which would you choose, Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) or Collibra Catalog for data subset validation?

21

IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Informatica TDM

23

Which solution would you choose: BMC Compuware or IBM Optim Test Data Management?

28

Why is Test Data Management important for companies?