Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS CloudFormation Logo

Top 10 AWS CloudFormation Alternatives

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top AWS CloudFormation Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS CloudFormation based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, and VMware Aria Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
AWS CloudFormation Logo
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager suits on-premises management with features like software deployments and patch management. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation enables automated cloud infrastructure setups. Buyers may prefer Configuration Manager for on-prem solutions, while others may select CloudFormation for cloud resource management.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager typically involves higher setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager typically involves higher setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
4.3 out of 5
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, with its agentless architecture and broad multi-cloud adaptability, is ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels within AWS, offering infrastructure as code with strong integration. Both solutions cater to specific automation needs and deployment preferences.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform Report
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often incurs lower setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious users, while AWS CloudFormation users report higher initial investment due to its extensive feature set, reflecting a difference in upfront financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform often incurs lower setup costs, making it attractive for budget-conscious users, while AWS CloudFormation users report higher initial investment due to its extensive feature set, reflecting a difference in upfront financial commitment.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
AWS CloudFormation Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
VMware Aria Automation enables customizable blueprints and advanced orchestration, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels with Infrastructure as Code and simplified cloud-native integration, appealing to those focused on AWS ecosystems.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
VMware Aria Automation involves higher setup costs, focusing on robust features, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more economical setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users. This contrast highlights VMware's comprehensive capabilities against AWS's budget-friendly entry.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Automation involves higher setup costs, focusing on robust features, while AWS CloudFormation offers a more economical setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users. This contrast highlights VMware's comprehensive capabilities against AWS's budget-friendly entry.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Red Hat Satellite
4.1 out of 5
Red Hat Satellite excels in automation and integration with Ansible for on-premises ecosystems. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation provides strong infrastructure as code in cloud environments. A tech buyer may choose Satellite for secure management, while CloudFormation may appeal for cost-effective resource orchestration.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Red Hat Satellite Report
Red Hat Satellite offers straightforward setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation involves a complex pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat Satellite offers straightforward setup costs, while AWS CloudFormation involves a complex pricing structure, highlighting significant differences in initial deployment expenses.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
AWS CloudFormation Logo
HashiCorp Terraform
4.3 out of 5
HashiCorp Terraform offers cross-cloud capabilities, making it ideal for multi-cloud strategies. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation excels in AWS-centric deployments with seamless AWS integration. Terraform's flexibility attracts hybrid users, while CloudFormation suits those focused solely on AWS environments.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. HashiCorp Terraform Report
HashiCorp Terraform involves a competitive setup cost, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers a simpler pricing structure, highlighting ease of initial budgeting.
View comparison
Pricing
HashiCorp Terraform involves a competitive setup cost, whereas AWS CloudFormation offers a simpler pricing structure, highlighting ease of initial budgeting.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Chef
4.0 out of 5
Chef focuses on flexible multi-cloud compatibility for diverse environments and technologies. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation offers cost-effective, seamless AWS service integration. Chef provides robust automation, while AWS CloudFormation appeals to those heavily invested in AWS for efficient resource management.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Chef Report
Chef's setup cost is typically lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, whereas AWS CloudFormation has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Chef's setup cost is typically lower, offering a more budget-friendly option, whereas AWS CloudFormation has higher setup costs, reflecting its extensive capabilities.
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
AWS CloudFormation Logo
Spring Cloud
3.3 out of 5
Spring Cloud is praised for microservices and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS CloudFormation's infrastructure as code and automation provide scalability. Spring Cloud's seamless Java integration attracts budget-conscious users, while AWS CloudFormation's robust feature set appeals to those seeking comprehensive AWS service integration.
Download AWS CloudFormation vs. Spring Cloud Report
Spring Cloud offers a low upfront setup cost, making it cost-effective for small-scale operations, while AWS CloudFormation has a higher initial setup expense, reflecting its comprehensive feature set suitable for extensive enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Spring Cloud offers a low upfront setup cost, making it cost-effective for small-scale operations, while AWS CloudFormation has a higher initial setup expense, reflecting its comprehensive feature set suitable for extensive enterprise environments.

Related categories

Configuration Management
Server Monitoring
Patch Management