No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo

VMWare Avi Load Balancer Reviews

Vendor: Broadcom
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is VMWare Avi Load Balancer?

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is designed for seamless integration with host environments, providing a user-friendly interface, stable deployment, scalability, and reliable performance.

Get the VMWare Avi Load Balancer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about VMWare Avi Load Balancer, NetScaler, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and more!
VMWare Avi Load Balancer is the #12 ranked solution in top Application Delivery Controllers. PeerSpot users give VMWare Avi Load Balancer an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. VMWare Avi Load Balancer is most commonly compared to NetScaler: VMWare Avi Load Balancer vs NetScaler. VMWare Avi Load Balancer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 56% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 20% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
VMWare Avi Load Balancer
April 2026
Get the report
Helped 890,124 peers since 2012

Featured VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews

Read more reviews

VMWare Avi Load Balancer mindshare

As of April 2026, the mindshare of VMWare Avi Load Balancer in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category stands at 5.1%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
VMWare Avi Load Balancer5.1%
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)13.6%
NetScaler12.2%
Other69.1%
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

PeerResearch reports based on VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Delivery Controllers (ADC)Apr 27, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)Apr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs HAProxyApr 27, 2026Download
ComparisonVMWare Avi Load Balancer vs NetScalerApr 27, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
NetScaler4.212.2%91%107 interviewsAdd to research
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)4.113.6%83%124 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 22, 2026

Valuable Features

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is highly valued for its integration capabilities within host environments. Users appreciate its stability, ease of deployment, and comprehensive visibility features. Its user interface, web application firewall, analytics, and deployment flexibility are praised, along with its load balancing and scalability. Many highlight the powerful technology background, easy-to-use GUI, and network infrastructure simplification, especially in managing dispersed services with a single control plane.
  • "Moving from a legacy solution to a newer one has provided us with tangible returns."
  • "The solution is entirely virtual, SDDC technologies drive it, and the integration with other projects is compelling."
  • "The integration into the host environment is the most valuable aspect right now."

Room for Improvement

VMWare Avi Load Balancer users suggest enhancements in pricing and better documentation. They express the need for bundled features, integration with other VMware products, and expanded security capabilities such as WAF, IDS, and IPS. Improved network analytics, monitoring, and multi-cloud integration via NSX Extended are mentioned. Some users highlight the complexity of the initial setup and express concerns about aggressive sales tactics. Overall, additional functionality for hyperscale environments and Kubernetes is desired.
  • "The initial setup is a bit complex."
  • "The product could be improved in terms of security features. For example, IDS and IPS sites need to be more progressive."
  • "It doesn't match the development structure or user community of our existing product. It pales in comparison to that."

ROI

Users have reported mixed outcomes regarding ROI from VMWare Avi Load Balancer. Some observed quick returns by avoiding large upfront hardware investments and ensuring efficient use of bandwidth and licensing. They highlighted the flexibility in aligning resources with application requirements, preventing overspending. Others have not experienced any financial gains or ROI yet, as specific use cases or challenges with over-engineering and underutilization have impacted the financial outcomes.

Pricing

VMware Avi Load Balancer pricing is viewed as moderate and competitive compared to alternatives like F5, providing cost-effective features such as flexible license transfers between data centers. Licensing costs are variable, often determined by bandwidth or CPU usage, and can be assessed similarly to AWS pricing models. Some users appreciate its affordability, rating it a three to five out of five, though opinions vary with some suggesting the product is expensive and in need of being cheaper.
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • "I rate the solution price a four to five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, since it is an affordable tool."
  • "The licensing costs for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer are really variable. The product can be sold from a bandwidth utilization perspective. It can be sold from a per CPU perspective, depending on if you're looking at on-premises or hyperscale environments. Licensing costs vary quite a bit if you're familiar with the AWS Calculator, where you can see that it can widely vary per licensing model.On a scale of one to five, with one being not very good value for the money and five being great, I would rate the pricing for Avi Networks Software Load Balancer a five because its pricing is extremely competitive.Not all features are included with the license, for example, there's single licensing."

Popular Use Cases

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is primarily used for application delivery, leveraging cloud deployment. Organizations utilize it for advanced capabilities like web application firewall, high-level visibility, application delivery controls, and Kubernetes service mesh. Its interface and infrastructure modernize load balancing compared to traditional methods. Users find it beneficial for specific use cases in isolated environments. The tool supports application delivery and resiliency, offering innovative functionalities in cloud environments.

Service and Support

VMWare Avi Load Balancer's customer service and support are mixed. Some resources excel, particularly during presales and implementation, while others lack responsiveness. Technical support receives praise for its efficient and close-knit operation. Satisfaction varies, with ratings ranging from three to nine out of ten. Some users experienced limited support, while others found it effective for personalized use cases. Feedback indicates an annual average of 70 to 150 support tickets, suggesting varying levels of problem resolution.

Deployment

VMWare Avi Load Balancer's initial setup varies in complexity. Some users find it straightforward, achieving deployment within a few hours, even in complex environments. Others note that setup takes longer due to its software nature, requiring coordination across teams and networking knowledge. While some rate the setup highly, others mention that deployment may extend if handling concurrent tasks. Users often manage with minimal personnel for setup and maintenance once implemented.

Scalability

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is generally considered scalable by users, although some find it challenging compared to hardware platforms. Its architecture, featuring control and data plane segregation, allows significant scalability potential. While some experience limitations with infrastructure compatibility, others expand usage with hundreds of applications. Users rate its scalability highly, noting continuous utilization and favorable architecture, but its scalability may vary by infrastructure specifics and user application requirements.

Stability

VMWare Avi Load Balancer is consistently described as stable and reliable, with no bugs, glitches, crashes, or freezes. Users highlight its fast recovery and health analytics. While most users are satisfied, some indicate that under extreme conditions or less powerful servers, performance can be limited. It is generally well-regarded for handling regular traffic, though some suggest it may be better suited for small to medium enterprises. Stability ratings range from eight to ten.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our VMWare Avi Load Balancer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business116
Midsize Enterprise72
Large Enterprise236
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Comms Service Provider
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
5%
Construction Company
4%
University
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Media Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%

Compare VMWare Avi Load Balancer with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about VMWare Avi Load Balancer

VMWare Avi Load Balancer offers a potent combination of advanced traffic management, application delivery, and network visualization tools tailored for cloud and modern infrastructures. Its core functionalities revolve around a robust web application firewall and comprehensive analytics, which make it a strong contender against competitors like NetScaler. Despite its expensive nature and certain integration challenges, it supports dispersed services with a single control plane. Its graphic interface aids in efficient network management, yet there's room for improvement in features like WAF, documentation, and multi-cloud environment support.

What are the key features of VMWare Avi Load Balancer?
  • Integration with Host Environments: Ensures seamless adoption across diverse infrastructure platforms.
  • User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and accelerates deployment processes.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands efficiently.
  • Robust Web Application Firewall: Provides enhanced security for web applications.
  • Powerful Analytics: Offers detailed insights for optimal traffic management and performance optimization.
  • Cluster Visualization: Visualizes network clusters for streamlined management.
What benefits do users find in VMWare Avi Load Balancer reviews?
  • Enhanced Network Performance: Users experience improved load balancing capabilities.
  • Simplified Management: The UI simplifies network and cluster operations.
  • Deployment Flexibility: Offers various options for deploying across cloud infrastructures.
  • Single Control Plane: Facilitates management of dispersed services effectively.

In the tech industry, VMWare Avi Load Balancer is primarily utilized for application delivery control, taking on roles such as web application firewalls and traffic visibility in cloud infrastructures. Its enhanced interface makes it a preferred choice for organizations transitioning from traditional load balancers, especially in roles like global load balancing and Kubernetes service mesh integration.

VMWare Avi Load Balancer was previously known as Avi Software Load Balancer.

VMWare Avi Load Balancer customers

Palo Alto Networks, DGDean, Swisslos

Related questions

  • 90
When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 371
Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
  • 90
Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
  • 78
What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
  • 97
Why do I need an ADC solution?
  • 101
What is the best ADC solution?
  • 88
Why is Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
NetScaler vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
NetScaler vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
HAProxy vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
HAProxy vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
NGINX Plus vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
NGINX Plus vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Fortinet FortiADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Fortinet FortiADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Radware Alteon vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Radware Alteon vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Kemp LoadMaster vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Kemp LoadMaster vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
LoadBalancer Enterprise vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
LoadBalancer Enterprise vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
Akamai Ion vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
Akamai Ion vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer Logo
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs VMWare Avi Load Balancer
See all alternatives
 
VMWare Avi Load Balancer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Pre Sales at a computer software company with 51-200 employees3.5I find VMware's recent licensing changes and high VCF prices problematic, causing client churn. The Avi Load Balancer is expensive, offers no unique features over competitors, and customer service is inconsistent. I rate it 3/10, recommending lower prices and standalone options.
Trainer/Consultant at Koenig Solutions Pvt. Ltd.3.5I've found VMWare Avi Load Balancer stable and scalable, with valuable load balancing and WAF features, though its documentation needs improvement. Its analytics and monitoring are helpful, but wider multi-cloud use and GSLB capabilities could be better.
Analyst at Nomura Securities5.0In my company, we use Avi Networks Software Load Balancer for its modern interface and infrastructure. While the UI is highly valuable, its documentation needs improvement. We haven't seen ROI yet, but its flexibility and scalability are advantageous.
Sr. Architect at NBC Universal2.5I am currently evaluating this stable product, finding its integration good despite its immaturity. Setup is straightforward, but it lacks scalability and third-party integration. I rate it 5/10 and advise thorough comparison before adoption, as it doesn't match our existing product line's maturity.
Digital Transformation Management Director at IU3.5Avi Networks Software Load Balancer simplified our network infrastructure management with virtual ID usage for multiple services, benefiting my previous organization. However, its network analytics and monitoring features need improvement and lacks deep troubleshooting and public IP capabilities, unlike F5.
Consultant at Pi DATACENTERS5.0I replaced traditional load balancers with Avi, finding it a stable, scalable next-gen solution offering excellent WAF and debugging. Despite complex setup, it delivers high availability and ROI, improving our organization. I rate it ten out of ten.
SASE - Anywhere Workspace Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees4.0I find Avi Networks Software Load Balancer agile, scalable, and easy to deploy, offering great value and ROI. Its strong analytics and stability impress me, though I'd like better integration with VMware and hyperscale platforms. Overall, a highly effective solution.
Senior Network and Security Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees3.0I found Avi Networks excellent for visibility and its GUI, offering cost benefits. However, it lacked stability under heavy load for my large infrastructure. Crucially, essential features are separate products, complicating management and making it unsuitable versus F5.