We are partners of Aruba as well as sellers and customers. My job in the company is IP network engineer.
Aruba IntroSpect offers advanced threat detection capabilities that are ideal for keeping enterprise networks secure through user and entity behavior analytics.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Aruba IntroSpect | 1.5% |
| Exabeam | 8.8% |
| IBM Security QRadar | 7.4% |
| Other | 82.3% |
Aruba IntroSpect uses machine learning to automatically analyze network traffic patterns. This includes detecting anomalies and identifying potential threats before they become serious. It provides rich insights into user and entity actions, helping IT professionals swiftly mitigate security issues. IntroSpect's intelligent analytics enable continuous visibility across endpoints, allowing more proactive threat management.
What are the key features of Aruba IntroSpect?In industries such as finance and healthcare, where protecting sensitive information is crucial, IntroSpect is implemented for its ability to identify insider threats and compliance violations. Its adaptable nature makes it suitable for enterprises of any size, providing comprehensive analytics and timely alerts to ensure continuous security monitoring.
Aruba IntroSpect was previously known as IntroSpect.
Sage Hotel, Centara Hotels and Resorts, Asda, The Dolder Grand,
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| IP Network Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find Aruba's roaming, application control, and firewall features valuable, with good scalability. However, there are occasional issues with application control/firewall, and technical support is a bit slow. I rate it 8/10. |
| Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I use this solution for reporting and analysis, valuing its end-user monitoring. It's stable and scalable, with an easy setup. However, I'd like a simplified dashboard for quicker insights. I rate it 7/10. |
| Network Product Manager/ Senior Presales engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees | 5.0 | I primarily use this solution for Wi-Fi packet sizing and analysis to find issues, and I haven't heard of stability problems. The packet analyzer could improve. Overall, I rate the solution highly. |

We are partners of Aruba as well as sellers and customers. My job in the company is IP network engineer.
The roaming is a feature that works very well. In addition, the application control and firewall features are very good. These are all important features and make the product a valuable one.
There are sometimes issues when it comes to the application control and firewall features. Occasionally we have issues when there are different access points with implementation and this could be improved if the technical support was better.
I've been using this solution for almost three years.
I haven't had any issues with the scalability.
Technical support is unfortunately a little slow. When we need to troubleshoot, it's important to have efficient and reliable technical support. If I compare the technical support of Cisco and the technical support of Aruba, Cisco is better.
I would rate this solution an eight out of 10.
The primary use case of this solution is for reporting and analysis.
The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring. If there is any abnormal behavior on the machine, the administrator will be alerted.
The dashboard could be simplified. You don't have a clear cut view and you have to dive deep into the options to gain some understanding.
In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard, where you can get the information with a simple click.
I have had over two years of experience using Aruba IntroSpect.
This solution is very stable. There are no issues.
This solution is scalable and it's based on licenses. It can be scaled at any time.
Initially, you are starting with 50 to 100 users. After testing, you advance to several users who can do the reporting and analysis. In our company, we have approximately 200 users. This solution is being used extensively, it's always running.
I have not contacted support but they are very competent. They can be reached at any time for any technical issues.
While I was not a part of the initial setup, we have a team in place who found it to be easy. There was nothing complicated with the initial setup, it was completely automated.
We have a team in our company to deploy and implement this solution.
The license is based on the number of users.
The evaluation license is free. You can download it from the website and try it out first.
It can be deployed anywhere. It's a VM that is also available as hardware.
Before starting, get an evaluation license first. You can gain some experience and get to know how useful it is and you will have the benefit of knowing where everything is.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
We primarily use the solution to do sizing in order to do analysis on the packet between users on Wi-Fi and the servers. It helps us to know if there are any issues with the packet or not.
The client chose the solution. It's been a while since I've used it, so I don't know if I can talk about its most important features.
The packet analyzer needs improvement.
If the customer has anything on the packet, if there's a problem or any viruses on the packet, the user needs to analyze the packets to know what he used and what is needed in the network.
It would be good if the solution had a dedicated firewall like Cisco Firepower.
I've been using the solution up until one year ago.
I haven't heard of any issues with stability.
I didn't work with the technical configuration. However, I believe if you have people with experience, it will be straightforward.
Our company implemented the solution with our technical team. The technical team had a lot of experience with IntroSpect.
We use the on-premises deployment model. We're Tier 1 partners with Aruba.
I don't have too much experience in the solution.
In terms of advice, I'd tell others that good project needs a good solution, so users need to make sure the products they choose fit their end goals.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.