We performed a comparison between Aruba IntroSpect and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."Roaming feature, application control and firewall features."
"I haven't heard of any issues with stability."
"The most valuable feature is the end-user monitoring. If there is any abnormal behavior on the machine, the administrator will be alerted."
"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."
"The threat hunting capabilities in general are great."
"The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"This solution has excellent security analytics."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very stable, easy to get going, and easy to manage. It is also easy to review all incidents."
"The correlation and the parsing are important features, since it is very important for a SIEM to have a good scalability and performance."
"The packet analyzer needs improvement."
"Technical support is a little slow."
"I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard, where you can get the information with a simple click."
"IBM Security QRadar’s GUI could be improved."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"Its architecture is very complicated."
"Solution has too many menus that require going to two or three sub-monitors to enter the QRadar."
"I have noticed a few things while working on this. After the restart of the server, sometimes, the services misbehave, and you need to manually start or restart the service. I have seen that specifically with the Tomcat service. Sometimes, when you click on log sources, instead of opening the log source extension, it redirects you over the internet."
"Some UI enhancements would be nice, such as exporting custom event properties and the ability to export rules."
"Integration could be better. They should make it easy to integrate with other solutions."
"They should speed up the incident response and also, at the same time, reduce the amount of manual effort that is required."
Aruba IntroSpect is ranked 24th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Aruba IntroSpect is rated 8.6, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba IntroSpect writes "A straightforward setup for technical users and an overall good product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Aruba IntroSpect is most compared with Arista NDR, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, LogRhythm UEBA, Darktrace and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.