Tekton Reviews

Name: Tekton
Brand: Google
Rating: 3.8 (36 reviews)

Vendor: Google

3.8 out of 5

36 reviews
88% willing to recommend

203 followers

Start review

What is Tekton?

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Get the Tekton Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Tekton, GitLab, VMware Tanzu Platform and more!

Tekton is the #2 ranked solution in top Build Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give Tekton an average rating of 7.6 out of 10. Tekton is most commonly compared to GitLab: Tekton vs GitLab. Tekton is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 72% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 23% of all views.

Helped 854,338 peers since 2012

Featured Tekton reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Prasad Gupta

Software Engineer at IBM Software Labs

One area for improvement is the number of CRDs created during installation. Tekton currently creates 10 to 11CRDs, which can be overwhelming. Instead, it would be better to have just one CRD that can handle all the information and create other necessary components automatically. Additionally, more integration capabilities for security, such as DAST, SAST, and IAST, should be directly built into Tekton to facilitate easier implementation of security features.

Read full review

Pravar Agrawal

Senior SRE at IBM

I appreciate its declarative style, which is easier to operate compared to something like Jenkins. Tekton offers better control in writing different pipelines or workflows, and its style is easier to understand. Additionally, Tekton's inclusion in Kubernetes deployment offers better visibility on how Tekton is performing within a cluster. It is lightweight and not as heavy as Jenkins to maintain.

Read full review

Tekton mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of Tekton in the Build Automation category stands at 12.0%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

PeerResearch reports based on Tekton reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Build Automation	Jun 4, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jun 4, 2025	Download
Comparison	Tekton vs GitLab	Jun 4, 2025	Download
Comparison	Tekton vs Jenkins	Jun 4, 2025	Download
Comparison	Tekton vs GitHub Actions	Jun 4, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
GitLab	4.3	15.4%	97%	84 interviews Add to research
VMware Tanzu Platform	4.0	0.9%	100%	22 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Tekton offers cloud-native integration with Kubernetes, providing scalability, flexibility, and customization for CI/CD workflows. Users appreciate its serverless architecture, ease of use, and user-friendly dashboard. It supports cloud-agnostic environments, seamless task integration, and pipeline orchestration. It allows parallelization, automated scaling, and detailed logging. Tekton's customizable components, such as tasks and triggers, enhance individual workflows. Its integration with container environments, reusable tasks, and resource efficiency make it ideal for Kubernetes-centric operations.

"The ability to scale is valuable."
"It scales automatically based on the number of tasks or pipelines running, which is efficient and effective for our development needs."
"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

Room for Improvement

Tekton needs better integration with tools and open-source software, improved documentation, and enhanced scalability. Configuring it requires deep Kubernetes knowledge, challenging beginners. Its dashboard and UI could benefit from features found in Jenkins or GitLab. Improvements in pipeline management, build efficiency, and error handling are necessary. YAML configurations need more flexibility. Enhancements in security management, version compatibility, and user accessibility are important, along with support for complex pipeline dependencies. Performance and stability issues, especially during deployments, need addressing.

"Improvement is needed in the build step."
"Incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future."
"Improvements could include introducing a UI-based pipeline development feature, such as drag and drop, which would help individuals with limited technical knowledge start building pipelines."

ROI

Organizations experience significant time savings and cost reductions with Tekton. Initial setup streamlines workflows, resulting in reduced deployment times. Shifting from Jenkins to Tekton cuts daily costs from $6,000 to $1,000 due to efficient cloud-native features. Tekton's scalability and efficiency outperform traditional Jenkins setups, reducing operational expenditures by requiring fewer resources within a Kubernetes environment. Although it increases some operational tasks, the overall resource optimization and reduced duplication of efforts enhance maintainability.

Pricing

Enterprise evaluations show that Tekton is predominantly open-source and free of charge, offering significant cost savings compared to licensed tools. Pricing considerations are more aligned with hosting platforms like OpenShift, where charges are based on vCPU licenses. Users highlight Tekton's efficient resource utilization, reducing costs associated with extensive infrastructure demands. Additional costs can arise from advanced features on certain platforms, but the core framework remains free, making Tekton a cost-effective solution for infrastructure management.

"The product is free and open-source."
"Tekton is an open-source tool."
"The product is free of cost."

Popular Use Cases

Primary use of Tekton involves its role as a CI/CD tool in Kubernetes environments. Users integrate Tekton with platforms like OpenShift, GitLab, and Nexus for orchestrating pipelines, handling code integration, and managing deployments seamlessly. Tekton's Kubernetes-native functionality streamlines automation, handling processes from building applications to deploying in various environments. Its versatility, ease of use, and integration capabilities with other tools make it a preferred choice in cloud-native applications.

Service and Support

Tekton's customer service and support are described as effective, particularly through Red Hat's involvement. Many mention reliable documentation and community resources, while some note slower response times on forums. Some handle issues internally or via community and GitHub. Others express satisfaction with Red Hat or Slack channel assistance. Despite some technical community limitations, users appreciate the support from Red Hat and IBM for more critical needs, relying heavily on internal expertise and resources.

Deployment

Some users found Tekton's initial setup simple due to clear documentation and straightforward integration with Kubernetes. Deployments were easy on OpenShift, taking a few minutes. Challenges included handling default configurations, integrating third-party tools, and understanding Tekton's architecture. Some found GitLab Runner preferable for ease. Despite initial difficulties with concepts like event listeners, users report easier configurations over time. Initial setup times varied, with complexities in defining pipelines and dependencies.

Scalability

Tekton demonstrates notable scalability through its integration with Kubernetes, enabling efficient management of resources, concurrent job execution, and adaptability across various cloud environments. Users across multiple teams experience its benefits but acknowledge room for improvement in scalability features. These include optimizing resource quotas and enhancing the ability to customize pipelines. Some organizations effectively scale Tekton by leveraging its cloud-native design, which facilitates managing resources across different clusters and regions while accommodating evolving business needs.

Stability

Tekton demonstrates strong stability for users, with reliable and efficient operations. Some experience minor issues, typically related to configurations or Kubernetes integration. Tekton's ability to autoscale with Kubernetes enhances cost efficiency. Occasional performance issues occur, often addressable through updates or infrastructure improvements. Users appreciate Tekton's flexibility and integration capabilities, though correct implementation is crucial. While a few report minor crashes or version compatibility problems, these are generally manageable through proactive maintenance and community support.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Tekton Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.