OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Core Endpoint Protection | 1.6% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 6.8% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 6.0% |
| Other | 85.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs CrowdStrike Falcon | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint | Jun 21, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 6.0% | 97% | 140 interviewsAdd to research |
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 4.2 | 3.7% | 96% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 2 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 171 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 58 |
| Large Enterprise | 78 |
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.
What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection was previously known as Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection.
Mytech Partners
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 1.0 | We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for cost-effective antivirus solutions, valuing its integration capabilities with managed service products. However, its threat detection needs improvement, and there's no significant ROI. We considered ESET NOD32 and Norton but chose Webroot for deployment options. |
| Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG | 4.0 | I use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for its seamless integration with my RMM tool, easy deployment, transparent pricing, and effective security features. Despite preferring a more modern UI, I found it superior to Trend Micro in transparency and documentation. |
| Managing Partner at InterHyve | 4.0 | I use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for smaller clients who lack EDRs. Its most valuable feature is the web interface for endpoint control. However, it needs to expand beyond antivirus capabilities and improve its customization options. |
| Partner at RUBENSTEIN/JUSTMAN MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS | 4.0 | We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for securing 20 PCs and a server in our office. It effectively prevents ransomware and viruses. While we've achieved ROI, I'd prefer a more intuitive setup and user experience. |
| Owner at R. A. Cassel & Associates | 2.5 | I use this lightweight antivirus, but it fails to proactively detect new threats like ransomware and its client-facing reports are worthless, making me create my own. The initial setup also lacks a "scan and deploy" feature. |
| President at National Payroll | 4.0 | I've never gotten malware with Webroot. However, it tremendously slows my Microsoft Access programming, costing valuable daily time, and I'm seeking a replacement despite good tech support and price. I rate it 7/10. |
| IT DevOps Engineer at Rpc Data | 4.0 | I use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for securing all production services with features like traffic security monitoring and easy deployment. However, it lacks efficacy against phishing and bots. Despite this, it still provides a return on investment. |
| Level III Technician at a tech services company with 201-500 employees | 4.5 | I use this antivirus for its unintrusiveness, low resource use, and easy management. While its 94% reliability is lower than competitors, I value this trade-off for user satisfaction, affordability, and simple setup. |
| Snr. Cyber Security Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I've used Webroot Endpoint Protection for 30 years, appreciating its robust features and simple setup. While effective (9/10), I desire improved multi-core utilization and real-time OTX integration for a truly perfect solution. |
| Manager-IT at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees | 3.5 | I use Webroot for endpoint protection alongside Kaspersky. While it's easy to manage with low resource usage and a good track record, I seek better ransomware, EDR, and detailed threat analysis, similar to SentinelOne, to improve my network security. |
We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients, providing it free of cost within their contract.
The main reason we had Webroot is that it was cost-effective for our clients. Also, their integration is superior, with multiple integrations with different products that managed service providers use.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.
We have had Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for eight to ten years.
The product seems to be stable. That said, it lacks the ability to detect threats effectively.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable. I would rate their scalability a ten out of ten.
I never had to interact with their customer support, so customer service is not really applicable in my experience.
There was no significant ROI with this product. It was a means to an end, providing a base antivirus to our clients at the most price-effective point.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.
We considered ESET NOD32 and Norton as other solutions. However, Webroot was more valuable as it had a lot more options for deployment and integrations, something that ESET did not have.
I would not recommend Webroot Business Endpoint Protection to others.
I'd rate the solution two out of ten.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is one of the solutions my solution provider recommends using with my RMM tool since the product offers better integration capabilities and pricing models.
I use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection in my company for endpoint security, virus protection, and web security.
With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, my company can save money and integrate it with RMM solutions.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.
I now have a test account with Webroot and the management console, which is a different experience from when I used Webroot Business Endpoint Protection privately. I haven't finished the testing phase with the tool yet, so I can't really say what needs improvement in the product.
Though the UI and documentation offered by Webroot are better than those of Trend Micro, I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI.
I have experience with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection.
I have only used the product privately and personally on my private computers.
I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.
I believe that it is a scalable solution.
The tool is used for around 50 to 60 seats in our company.
Our company has not yet approved Webroot Business Endpoint Protection to replace Trend Micro, so it's not currently used. I will retest the tool soon.
I have experience with Trend Micro.
The solution is deployed on the cloud, which could be an advantage or a disadvantage for some, but personally, for me, working with the cloud-based version is better because it is less work, and I don't have to fiddle with the area of on-premise installations. I am definitely sure that my RMM solution cannot be deployed on an on-premises model. Since Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is integrated with the RMM solution I use, I think it's probably going to stay in the cloud. Some of my managers have expressed concern about cloud-only solutions for reasons related to availability.
I haven't deployed Webroot Business Endpoint Protection yet, but Webroot offers a very nice guide to deploying the tool with Active Directory (AD). The only thing I have managed to do so far with the product is set up the user account and company accounts, which seem to have worked quite well. I managed to integrate the tool with the RMM solution I use, so I was able to establish the API connection. Though things have worked out well for me with the solution, I haven't deployed it yet.
With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle.
I have had some private experience with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for a particular period of time, and I did not choose to work with it because I was happy with the product overall. I chose the product based on the comparisons I made between the tool and the other solutions in the market. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is integrated with the RMM solution used in the company. If Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had not been integrated with the RMM solution, I would have switched to another solution.
I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.
There are a lot of endpoint security protection products available in the market that people should compare and evaluate before deciding on a specific tool. From my experience, I would say the pricing of different products needs to be checked carefully, considering how my employer paid too much money for quite some time.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
I use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for my company's smaller customers who cannot buy EDRs.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection provides a great interface, making deploying and controlling endpoints easy.
The most valuable feature of the solution is its web interface for controlling the endpoints.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is an antivirus, making it hard to compare to other products in the market. Improvement-wise, the solution has improved on quite a few things now. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to focus on how they can widen their area of scope by not just being an antivirus tool anymore. The shortcoming in the customization area of the tool needs improvement.
I have been using Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for seven years. I don't remember the version of the solution. My company is a customer of the solution.
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
In my company, around 1,100 users use the solution.
My company caters to the needs of small-sized companies that use the solution.
The solution's technical support never gave my company the fastest response time. I rate the technical support a seven out of ten.
Neutral
I rate the initial setup phase a ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.
In general, the solution's initial setup is very straightforward.
I do the deployment of the solution through RMM, so I cannot specifically state whether the solution is deployed on a public or private cloud.
The solution can be deployed in five minutes.
I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees.
I will tell those planning to use the solution that they need to consider it's used for their small-sized customers since it is a great solution.
I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
Webroot provides endpoint protection for 20 PCs in our office and our server. It also provides DNS protection.
Webroot has kept us from having issues with regard to ransomware or other viruses.
Webroot does what we bought it to do with endpoint protection. It monitors traffic and keeps us from getting ransomware or other viruses.
I want Webroot to be easier to use and set up. It is not very intuitive.
I have used Webroot for three years, and I use the latest version.
I rate the stability of this solution a ten out of ten.
Scalability is not an issue with this solution.
Although they have a lot of documentation, their online support does not provide much in the way of people support. You can submit a support ticket, but it's pretty challenging to talk to somebody.
Neutral
We have seen a return on investment with Webroot.
The solution is very cost-effective.
The problem with Webroot is that they were acquired by OpenText. OpenText has acquired several products, and now it's confusing as to the scope of products OpenText is selling to support Webroot because they have several competitive products.
I rate Webroot Business Endpoint Protection an eight out of ten.
We've got it on a few hundred workstations on the solution. We use it as an antivirus.
Probably, compared to other antivirus programs, what we like about it is it is lightweight. It's all MD five hash-based checking on systems.
We've had a couple of events both this year and last year where it just didn't seem to catch ransomware, which is impossible to do if someone has hands-on with the system. There were some things that they had or used to have or don't have that I still haven't figured out called journaling. And it was supposed to be a way to roll back changes that were made. However, they're telling me they don't have that. That's not in the system.
It’s my understanding that it doesn’t actually scan any files at all. They just look at their database of files they've scanned previously, and either it matches or doesn't. That might be where the shortcoming is, is that it just can't stay up-to-date fast enough to stop new things that are coming in. It's an after-the-fact anti-virus. It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it.
There is one thing that is deplorable with the product that I would change as soon as I found a better one. However, the reports are worthless. You go and look at a scan report and cannot get a log of machines. I can log into a console and see the files were scanned every day at 2:00 AM, and they all passed green or something was detected and removed. However, you have to go to the console. I don't have anything that I can send to my client on reports. What they give you is a bunch of bar graphs with no details. You can't drill down. It'll say two infections. However, it doesn't tell you what machines. You've just really got several different reports, and they're all just a bunch of graphs and wasted paper. There's nothing really substantial. The reports that I can use for client-facing, once a month, to say, "Here, we scanned all these workstations. Here are our results," don’t exist. They've got fake reports.
I've screamed about that for years, and they just won't do anything. Therefore, I created my own little up-to-date or not ask fail-type report. I send that to them in place of a report directly from a product.
I’ve used the solution for probably about five years now.
Overall, the solution is stable. We don’t have issues with bugs or glitches. It doesn’t crash or freeze.
My understanding is that the solution can scale.
Right now, it’s installed on 150 devices.
I haven't had to use their tech support in years. I wouldn't know how helpful or responsive they are.
The initial setup is okay. However, they don't have a way to scan and deploy, and just about every other virus program has scan and deploy. With this product, you've got to use PS tools and push it out, make it MSI and deploy it through the active directory, or send the customer a link by email to install it.
I can't log into a server or workstation, scan the network, and push the product out. It doesn't have that capability, and people have been asking for it for years. They're just not going to do it.
It doesn't require anyone dedicated to maintenance. It's pretty much self-updating. We haven't really run into problems with installing or reinstalling updates and patches and so forth. It seems to do a good job automatically of keeping itself up to date.
The solution costs a dollar per month per workstation.
Comparatively speaking, Komodo's supposed to be the best. However, it is heavy when it comes to overhead. The older machines with 4GBs of Ram, you can't run it on there, and that's the same thing I found with some other solutions. I do look at the ratings across the board before I try to pick.
I'm kind of neutral on Webber. It's okay. We have it. Our RM company provides it for a dollar a copy, and that's what we use.
We’re using something around version 9. It’s updated periodically and automatically.
If client-facing reports are not crucial to a company, then it might be a good solution candidate.
I’d rate the solution five out of ten.
We’re resellers, and we do have some clients that aren't managed that are on standalone web licenses for their enterprise. However, our MM provider has it integrated as a part of their service. There are three antivirus vendors that you can choose from in there from a dollar to a dollar and a quarter a piece, so we just go through them to get it.
The most valuable aspect of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is that I have never gotten malware with it.
I'm not happy with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, for only one reason. It seems that it slows down my interface when I'm doing programming in Microsoft Access, tremendously. When I'm just using Access, it seems to work fine. But when I'm doing the Access programming, it slows down substantially. Sometimes I wait maybe five, or six seconds for different screens to come up. It probably costs me 15 to 20 minutes every day. It's aggravating. I am currently looking for a replacement. However, I will say I've never gotten malware with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection.
I have been using Webroot Business Endpoint Protection for about two to three years.
I have not had any problems with stability except for the slowness on the server. It doesn't even slow me down on my laptop, but it slows me down tremendously on the server.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection's scalability is fine for me.
I have dealt with tech support. Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers. They suggested, for example, that the issues with the speed that I have been having could be fixed by turning the solution off completely. They have shown me how to do that and it does make the problem go away at least temporarily. However, I can't operate that way, of course.
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is not too expensive. My licenses cost me between $300 and $400. It is really good price wise.
I would give Webroot Business Endpoint Protection a seven out of ten.
We use it as a security tool for all our production services. So we have Webroot via a client on every production server.
The traffic security monitoring, traffic application access feature called the agent, the main feature which is the endpoint security feature are the ones I found valuable. And it also had the in branch security in kind of SD WAN, good three hundred and sixty protection. It is specific and there is ease of deployment also present.
The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition.
I have been using the solution for two years.
It is a stable solution. It wasn't resource intensive because, most of the time, you have these cybersecurity solutions. They tend to get resource intensive on the machines, which changed, but it didn't impact our endpoints.
It is a scalable solution. I rate it nine out of ten. 60-80 users are using the solution in my company.
I accessed their cloud platform and downloaded the file setup file for the initial setup. Then I ran a policy on my domain controller with the file installed. The initial step is to have an account with Webroot and then activate the license. And then, you get the user admin user portal, download the setup, and install it, like any other software on an endpoint.
The deployment was done in-house.
There is a Return on Investment.
The pricing is high.
Harmony has all the features that Webroot does not have like URL zero phishing protection.
My recommendation is definitely to start using Webroot. It's very easy to deploy and a scalable cybersecurity solution. There is no requirement for learning, straightforward installation and deployment are user-friendly.
I rate it eight out of ten.
It is just an antivirus. We have it on the machines to help mitigate anything before it takes hold of the network.
It is pretty unintrusive. It doesn't take over the system like McAfee or Norton. It doesn't use a whole lot of resources. McAfee and Norton use a lot of resources.
It is also pretty easy to manage.
Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something.
I haven't had an issue. It has been pretty reliable.
I've used it as an endpoint. It is pretty scalable. I can put it on as many endpoints as I want.
We opened our doors about a month ago, and we don't have any customers yet. Currently, we have just done the labs.
I haven't had to use them.
We use a remote management software program that allows us to get into computers remotely and make sure that everything is up to date and do the virus scans, etc. There is an integration with the one that we use. It is really easy. It is with the touch of a button.
It is easy to manage. Through our remote management software, we set up the schedule for updating and scanning, and it sends us reports.
Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user.
The advice I'd give is just to make sure you get something. We had an interview with some clients today. We asked about endpoint solutions on their computers, and they didn't have any. Then, we asked about their servers and got the same answer. I told them to find something, even if it is a free one, and put it there.
I'd rate it a nine out of ten just because of that 94% catch rate. Otherwise, I would've rated it higher.
Webroot Endpoint Protection secures threat mitigation. Then, of course, there are elements for continual data monitoring to get to the areas that are affected.
The ASA is frontline as far as the next-generation firewall goes. We incorporated a whole bunch of elements for identification, classification of threats, grouping, and integration with it; as well as logging application data from endpoints on the network into a log server for further processing. There are a lot of features in ASA. Over time, it has remained the model for NG USM like Webroot.
The website is helpful. There are videos showing various Security scenarios as part of their SAT integration. SAT (Security Awareness Training is the most important component of any Digital Security Program.
Webroot pioneered integration of Novel concepts in Endpoint protection.
One marked improvement that I see is that the scanning speed is much improved in Windows 11.
Looking for the Next Gen Webroot to leverage Multi Core Architecture supported by a robust Operating System Executive that is fully aware of it's underlying Hardware Architecture and Foundation; with live integration and feed into most reliable OTXs in real time.
Additional video on really demonstrating the runtime features of the product would be helpful. For example, how do you do continual data monitoring? How do you verify their connections? A lot of people know about antivirus protection, however, the product does a whole lot more.
They can do a whole lot more. Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine.
I've used the solution for about 30 years. It's been a long while.
I've been a Webroot partner for many, many years.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. If they had OTX integration and the ability to do in-process OTX API Calls on the endpoint for 1st time and update: URLs, IP addresses, Domain Names and Telephone Nos, Email Addresses and newly defined Data Classes, maybe I'd make it a Ten out of Ten.
We have been using a two-prong security system for our network. We had a combination of Kaspersky along with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection. This gave us two layers of defense and it has been working really well for us.
With the current increased world threat scenarios, we are looking for other protection possibilities.
The solution has many features. It is very easy to define and set the policies based on the user groups, it does not take up a lot of resources in operation, and has provided us with a good track record of protection.
The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection.
If Webroot could match up to something similar to what a CrowdStrike or SentinelOne is providing, I would consider Webroot again. For example, there are more advanced features such as EDR and sandboxing. In SentinelOne, when there is a threat it automatically does the analysis and provides you with detailed reports, but Webroot is lacking in the details.
I have been using this solution for approximately two years.
The solution is stable.
In my experience the solution is stable.
We have approximately 75 people using the solution in my organization.
We have used the support.
We have previously used many other solutions, such as Mcafee and Norton. Many of them were pretty heavy on resources and users are complaining about slowness on the systems. This is why we had to move to another solution, which is a combination of Kaspersky and Webroot.
The installation is straightforward.
I rate Webroot Business Endpoint Protection a seven out of ten.
