CrowdStrike Falcon vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection comparison

CrowdStrike and OpenText are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. CrowdStrike is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 6.8. CrowdStrike holds a 10.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CrowdStrike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

CrowdStrike Falcon

Read 132 CrowdStrike Falcon reviews

24,494 Views
15,460 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Read 31 OpenText Core Endpoint Protection reviews

1,667 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CrowdStrike Falcon

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

CrowdStrike Falcon and OpenText Core Endpoint Protection are two robust cybersecurity solutions competing in the endpoint protection category. CrowdStrike seems to have the upper hand due to its real-time response capabilities and advanced threat analysis.

Features: CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, automatic alerts, and a cloud-native architecture, making it a strong choice for enterprises seeking minimal system performance impact. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection focuses on basic security functionalities, integration with existing systems, and user-friendly UI.

Room for Improvement: CrowdStrike users express the need for improved threat correlation, better integration with other security technologies, and enhanced dashboard reporting. OpenText could improve its UI, reporting capabilities, and threat detection efficiency. Both solutions could benefit from enhanced integration within broader security ecosystems and by reducing false positives.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CrowdStrike offers versatility across various cloud environments, receiving praise for proactive customer service and extensive documentation. OpenText leans towards hybrid and on-premises solutions, with users appreciating knowledgeable support but wishing for faster response times.

Pricing and ROI: CrowdStrike Falcon is generally more expensive but often justified by its comprehensive features and lower management overhead, leading to a perceived higher ROI. OpenText offers affordable pricing but may require additional management resources, resulting in mixed opinions about its value.

To learn more, read our detailed CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 858,038 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrowdStrike Falcon

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

132

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (6th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (1st), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (1st), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (2nd), AI-Powered Cybersecurity Platforms (1st)

OpenText Core Endpoint Prot...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of CrowdStrike Falcon is 10.8%, up from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Waleed Omar

Information Security Specialist at Arab Open University

Provides effective real-time threat detection with potential for cost optimization

Some features such as device control, firewall management, and file analysis are standalone products that we need to purchase separately. If these features came out of the box within the product, it would be much more beneficial for us. Other providers such as SentinelOne include these features in their base product. We attended a CrowdStrike Falcon event where they discussed some shallow AI features, but we cannot see these in our panel yet. We work with different solutions such as Darktrace and SocRadar, where AI features are automatically displayed in our dashboards after release. However, for CrowdStrike Falcon, we cannot see these features.

Read full review

Urs Schuerch

Information Technology Engineer at Ingenias AG

A tool that offers good UI and documentation

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection had sent me a physical installation medium, which was very easy to obtain and deploy. It was also easy to configure, and it had a nice UI. I didn't have any problems with the product. I think that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very transparent about the pricing models offered to users. The tool also maintains transparency about the features and specifications. Previously, when I compared the two products with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I saw that with Trend Micro, it is very difficult to transparently find out what it offers and how much it charges for it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The automatic alert feature is the most important feature of the solution."

"Falcon has the capacity to identify potential problems quickly. The administrator can deploy the agent, and the users cannot change it. This assures you that the agent remains on this device. Also, the agent can act preemptively to provide alerts about potential problems."

"CrowdStrike Falcon has a ransom detection time of less than 50 seconds."

"Overall, what I found most valuable in CrowdStrike Falcon is its good mechanism. It also has a good reporting feature. CrowdStrike Falcon is an invaluable tool because, through it, you can take quick action, for example, when an OS is missing specific patches."

"I like the detection rates of mobile threats."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"There are two things which customers really like about CrowdStrike. If they buy managed services from CrowdStrike, it offers them detection of security issues in one minute. If you buy their professional services, they offer insurance where you can claim up to $5 million if there's a breach. This is a huge upsell for customers."

"It's really good because it can detect anything."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pros

"The feature we found most valuable is the AI functionality for maintaining endpoint security. This is very powerful."

"We've not had any issues with scalability. If an organization needs to expand, they can do so quite easily."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very scalable."

"It is very lightweight on the workstations, not slowing them down while still doing its job very well."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"There aren't any features that really stand out — I just want it to keep malware out of my system. To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."

"The Webroot cloud console is very powerful."

"Valuable features include good scanning, very light footprint and management console that the client can access and (just as important) in which I can see status of groups of computers (I am a consultant, IT role)."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

Cons

"I think there's an opportunity to enhance the AI or at least the traps to say, if something changes from this baseline, let us know and flag it."

"Some of Falcon's features are a bit pricey."

"If we have a dashboard capability to uninstall agents, I think that would be great."

"CrowdStrike Falcon by itself does not supply in-depth reporting."

"The solution could improve the policies themselves. It would be helpful if there were cost-cutting measures."

"It would be nice if they did have some sort of Active Directory tie-in, whether that be Azure or on-prem. Sometimes, it is difficult for us to determine if we are missing any endpoints or servers in CrowdStrike. We honestly don't have a great inventory, but it would be nice if CrowdStrike had a way to say this is everything in your environment, Active Directory-wise, and this is what doesn't have sensors. They try to do that now with a function that they have built-in, but I have been unsuccessful in having it help us identify what needs a sensor. So, better visibility of what doesn't have a sensor in our environment would be helpful."

"I would like to see equal support across all versions. Aside from that, I would say most of the features are there."

"The dashboard area must be improved. We have integration with Splunk, and we are creating a dashboard there. Their dashboard area must be up to date. It should have more details and more options to create the reports and things like that."

More CrowdStrike Falcon cons

"Since they're dealing with multi-core environments now, the best option would be for them to enhance the product so that the product can automatically do an assessment on the machine."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

"The console spins up relatively slowly, and some of the configuration items are obscure (e.g., reporting back one time per day is a default setting) and need to be tweaked."

"I believe that Webroot Business Endpoint Protection should offer a more modern UI."

"It doesn't do anything proactive. The virus has to hit the machine before it detects it."

"The solution could improve by providing better ransomware protection."

"Usually, when it comes to reliability, McAfee and Norton are at 99 percent. Webroot's percentage is lower. It is 94% reliable in terms of what it catches, but you're trading that percentage for customer satisfaction because your computer isn't being constantly told that it just blocked something, or it just did something."

"Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable. I don't think we are getting charged more than what it is worth. It is fair, but I do not like how it is a la carte. I realize they do that so other organizations can buy and get the agent, getting it cheaper than you could otherwise. However, if you want the main core package, which has all the main features with the exception of maybe the multi-cloud protections, that can get pricier for an organization. So, you have to pick and choose what you want. I do not care for a la carte pricing."

"I am not aware of the price, but I believe that it is among the most expensive XDRs out there. Of course, this is dependent on the features you choose. Depending on the features, the price might increase."

"We are at about $60,000 per year."

"There is no license required to use this solution."

"It is an expensive product, but I think it is well worth the investment."

"The pricing is good and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The pricing is not bad. It's on the higher end of the market, but you get what you pay for."

"Our company pays approximately US$ 65,000 annually for 900 machines."

More CrowdStrike Falcon pricing and cost advice

"With Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, I can select a yearly billing cycle."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

"I rate the product's pricing a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. There are no costs in addition to the product's standard licensing fees."

"It is relatively cheap."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"The pricing is high."

"The solution doesn't cost too much. It's about 30 Euros a year for each endpoint. It's pretty affordable for us and for many other companies."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Real Estate/Law Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions that are very scalable, secure, and user-friendly. Cortex XDR by Palo Alto offers ...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with Darktrace?

Both of these products perform similarly and have many outstanding attributes. CrowdStrike Falcon offers an amazing user interface that makes setup easy and seamless. CrowdStrike Falcon offers a cl...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?

The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

I haven't observed any of the instabilities in the solution. It is a stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's advertised to do. Real-time threat detection also doesn't work as it should.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 6% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 5% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs CrowdStrike Falcon

Compared 3% of the time

More CrowdStrike Falcon Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 25% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Cynet vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon

June 2025

Download CrowdStrike Falcon product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

May 2025

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

CrowdStrike Falcon, CrowdStrike Falcon XDR, CrowdStrike Falcon Threat Intelligence, CrowdStrike Identity Protection, CrowdStrike Falcon Surface

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

Overview

CrowdStrike Falcon provides endpoint protection and threat intelligence using a cloud-based platform for real-time detection and response. Its minimal impact on system performance and ease of deployment are key benefits along with advanced logging and reporting for compliance and forensic analysis.

CrowdStrike Falcon is known for its efficacy in identifying malware, ransomware, and sophisticated cyber threats. The platform's cloud-native architecture and advanced AI capabilities ensure comprehensive endpoint visibility and rapid response times. Users appreciate the lightweight agent and seamless deployment process, along with detailed reporting features. Integration with security tools and efficient customer support are essential features.

What are the key features of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Real-time Threat Detection: Provides immediate threat identification and response.
Lightweight Agent: Minimal impact on system performance.
Cloud-native Architecture: Ensures flexibility and scalability.
Advanced AI Capabilities: Enhances threat detection and prevention.
Comprehensive Endpoint Visibility: Complete insight into endpoint activities.
Detailed Reporting: Facilitates compliance and forensic analysis.
Security Tool Integration: Seamless integration with other tools.
Efficient Customer Support: Robust support services.

What are the benefits or ROI of CrowdStrike Falcon?

Improved Threat Detection: Identifies sophisticated threats, reducing risk.
Enhanced System Performance: Lightweight agent ensures minimal disruption.
Faster Response Times: Swift reaction to incidents minimizes damage.
Better Compliance: Detailed logs meet regulatory requirements.
Streamlined Deployment: Easy to implement with minimal downtime.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and retail, CrowdStrike Falcon is often used for critical security due to its robust threat detection capabilities. Financial firms value its rapid response and detailed reporting for compliance, while healthcare providers appreciate the minimal system performance impact. Retailers benefit from its comprehensive endpoint visibility and integration with other security tools.

CrowdStrike

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Mytech Partners

Buyer's Guide

CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

June 2025

Free Report: CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

858,038 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrowdStrike Falcon vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.