Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Reviews

Vendor: McAfee
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.
Get the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and more!
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the #17 ranked solution in SOAR tools. PeerSpot users give McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most commonly compared to Microsoft Sentinel: McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Microsoft Sentinel. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is popular among the small business segment, accounting for 44% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 8% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
March 2026
Get the report
Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Featured McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

Read more reviews

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator in the Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) category stands at 1.3%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator1.3%
Microsoft Sentinel12.2%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR8.8%
Other77.7%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

PeerResearch reports based on McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySecurity Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)Mar 28, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonMcAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Microsoft SentinelMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonMcAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Splunk SOARMar 28, 2026Download
ComparisonMcAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOARMar 28, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Sentinel4.112.2%93%107 interviewsAdd to research
IBM Security QRadar4.06.0%90%217 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is valued for centralized management, ease of use, and scalability. Users appreciate its automated workflows, intuitive interface, and extensive reporting capabilities. The tool offers effective endpoint protection, policy management, and data loss prevention. Features like application control, encryption, and integration with IT workflows enhance its utility. It simplifies virus updates and deployments through a centralized console, providing robust security and streamlined operations. Integration and customization flexibility are notable strengths for organizations.
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
  • "McAfee's advantage is that there are fewer false positives compared to some of these other vendors, so I'd say they're doing well."
  • "The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."

Room for Improvement

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator needs improved documentation and user interface, better integration with cloud services, enhanced threat detection and reporting features, support for more platforms like macOS, improved customer service, and performance optimization to reduce resource usage. The manual setup requires simplification, false positives need addressing, compatibility issues in environments demand attention, agent communication and automation require enhancement, and licensing clarity needs improvement, while offering more unified and comprehensive threat management capabilities.
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator requires a lot of manual work."
  • "Features such as full drive encryption are lacking in the cloud version."
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer."

Pricing

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing is considered mid-range and varies significantly depending on usage and organization size. Large enterprises may find the cost reasonable, though small businesses might perceive it as expensive. Licensing is modular with potential additional costs for extra components. Setup can take substantial time, with some noting the price is high compared to competitors. Despite some finding it economical with available free versions, others highlight costs can climb with added functionality and support.
  • "It's an expensive solution"
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is a cheaply priced product, meaning it is not expensive since McAfee provides a free version of ePO, which includes phone support as well."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for managing endpoint protection, deploying antivirus solutions, and controlling data loss prevention. It handles centralized management of security policies, updates, and configurations for endpoints, including desktops and servers. Data protection features like USB and hard drive control, ransomware, and malware protection are commonly utilized. It supports managing various modules such as threat intelligence, firewalls, and application whitelisting to safeguard IT environments effectively.

Service and Support

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's customer service is rated highly, but technical support receives mixed feedback. Many users find it responsive and helpful, though some mention delays and regional inconsistencies. Enterprises with premium support contracts often get quicker assistance, while basic support can be slower. There's praise for knowledgeable staff, but some users report issues with first-level support quality. The escalation process sometimes lacks expertise, impacting the efficiency of issue resolution.

Deployment

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's initial setup experience varies. Many users find it straightforward, especially for basic functions, but advanced components can be challenging. Some organizations note it’s easy with adequate experience, while others face complexity requiring skilled personnel. Deployment time differs based on environment complexity, ranging from a few hours to weeks. Some users highlight the need for manual intervention, training, and customer-specific configurations to ease the process.

Scalability

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator demonstrates strong scalability, handling significant increases in endpoints effectively. Users have expanded from hundreds to thousands globally. While planning is essential due to complexity, it accommodates complex environments and varying organizational sizes. High scalability ratings are common, with users able to expand and integrate easily. Some encountered challenges during system upgrades or agent connectivity issues, but its potential impresses, especially with its ability to integrate multiple products and manage extensive endpoints.

Stability

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is largely stable. Users highlight no significant issues, with some noting occasional bugs, resource issues, or slowness during updates. A few experiences with specific component instability such as Sandboxing and ATP are mentioned. Stability is rated highly by most, with consistent reliability and minimal crashes reported. Some users observe slowness when enabling certain modules but find stability satisfactory when maintained properly.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business57
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise49
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
8%
Marketing Services Firm
8%
University
8%
Performing Arts
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Construction Company
5%
Outsourcing Company
5%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Transportation Company
4%
Real Estate/Law Firm
4%
Healthcare Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Legal Firm
2%
Government
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
1%
Wellness & Fitness Company
1%
Agriculture
1%

Compare McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator was previously known as McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Related questions

  • 37
How easy is it to integrate Microsoft Intune with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator?
  • 16
Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?
  • 140
What are the Top 5 cybersecurity trends in 2022?
  • 160
What is the difference between SIEM and SOAR platforms?
  • 80
What is an incident response playbook and how is it used in SOAR?
  • 39
What are the latest trends in Security Operations Center (SOC)?
  • 98
What tools and solutions do you use for automated incident response in an enterprise in 2022?
  • 46
How to evaluate SIEM detection rules?
  • 43
Why a Security Operations Center (SOC) is important?
  • 57
What types of Security Operations Center (SOC) deployment models do exist?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Sentinel vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
IBM Security QRadar vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Elastic Security vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Elastic Security vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
AWS Security Hub vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
AWS Security Hub vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
Splunk SOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
Splunk SOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
IBM Resilient vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
IBM Resilient vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
CRITICALSTART vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Logo
CRITICALSTART vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
See all alternatives
 
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
System Administrator at Sky News Arabia4.0For over a decade, I've found McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator highly manageable and effective for security automation and diverse component management. Its stability and scalability are strong, despite a recent decline in customer service quality. I still recommend it.
IT Manager at Gigabit Technologies Pvt Ltd4.0I use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for managing endpoint solutions and appreciate its centralized console and automated XDR responses. However, the support response is lacking, often delaying issue resolution, unlike my experience with CrowdStrike, which offers superior performance.
Head of Content at Pharmaflow4.5At our organization, we use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator to automate security alerts and mitigate threats. Its vital alert automation feature notifies professionals effectively. However, it's pricey and could benefit from customizable metrics, easier integration, and operation improvements.
Owner at Network Technics & Systems Ltd5.0I use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for endpoint and antivirus management, finding its performance and ROI good. However, improvement is needed in integration with various platforms, especially as we migrate to the cloud. McAfee offers a comprehensive portfolio, though patching could be better.
Sr. System Engineer at Zensar Technologies5.0I use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for managing daily operations, including task management and disaster recovery planning, with valuable endpoint protection and troubleshooting features. Improvements are needed in product assignment policies and tag assignment for better system sorting.
Cyber Security Coordinator at Gecelca SA E.S.P.2.5McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator effectively protects our enterprise from viruses and malware, with features like blocking USBs and easy setup. Improvements needed include faster updates, enhanced vulnerability scanning, simpler user interface for exceptions, and better MDM integration.
Senior Marketing Specialist II at Harman International3.0I use McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator for policy patching. Its agent communication is valuable, and it's stable and scalable, with easy Windows setup. However, it's expensive, lacks container support, and requires maintenance. I rate it 6/10.
Technical Support Engineer at Professional Technologies Kenya4.5I find this antivirus and device control solution stable and scalable. MVISION Insights and fewer false positives are valuable, but the cloud version lacks full drive encryption and needs better SIEM integration.