Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Rational Test Workbench Logo

IBM Rational Test Workbench Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.8 out of 5
1,220 followers
Start review

What is IBM Rational Test Workbench?

Featured IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

IBM Rational Test Workbench mindshare

Product category:
As of May 2025, the mindshare of IBM Rational Test Workbench in the Performance Testing Tools category stands at 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Performance Testing Tools
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
8%
Non Profit
8%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Logistics Company
3%
University
3%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Healthcare Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Educational Organization
2%
 

IBM Rational Test Workbench reviews

Sort by:
PeerSpot user
IT Specialist, ITE at a government with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of IBM Rational Test Workbench
Mar 16, 2021
Good reporting and interface, but supports limited types of protocols and requires low-level script editing

Pros

"Reporting is pretty good. Its interface is also good. I'm overall pretty happy with the functionality and use of IBM Rational Test Workbench. "

Cons

"It should have more interfaces. In terms of interfaces or protocols, what you can do with Rational is far limited as compared to other products out there. What it does, it does great, but it only gives you limited types of protocols. It supports between 8 to 15 types of protocols, whereas other test tools give you 20 to 30 types of protocols with which you can do testing and convert to script. It records Javascript-based scripts, and you got to know a little bit of Java to basically be able to edit them, but the level of editing you got to do is very low. I like that, but the ability to edit the script is not as good as Parasoft or LoadRunner, which have C-Script."
RC
IT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services
Verified user of IBM Rational Test Workbench
Sep 25, 2017
Product version discussed: 9.1.0
Using service virtualization, we are able to accelerate the testing and development activity
Find out what your peers are saying about Performance Testing Tools. Updated April 2025
852,852 professionals have used our research since 2012.
KashifJamil - PeerSpot user
CEO at Xcelliti
Verified user of IBM Rational Test Workbench
Feb 25, 2021
Good integration with other tools, stable, scales easily

Pros

"This solution provides for API testing, functional UI testing, performance testing, and service virtualization. "

Cons

"There are a number of things that they can do to simplify the tools, but the most important thing that they need to do is simplify the installation."
PeerSpot user
IBM Software Test Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Verified user of IBM Rational Test Workbench
Oct 8, 2015
Product version discussed: 8.5, 8.5.0.1, 8.5.0.2, 8.5.1, 8.6, 8.6.0.2
The Eclipse client has the ability to do the test scripts for recording, although it has the concatenation issues which cause the incorrect grammar in different languages.