Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
HPE OneView Logo

HPE OneView Reviews

Vendor: Hewlett Packard Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

What is HPE OneView?

HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.

Get the HPE OneView Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about HPE OneView, Zabbix, Datadog and more!
HPE OneView is the #18 ranked solution in Infrastructure Monitoring tools. PeerSpot users give HPE OneView an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. HPE OneView is most commonly compared to Zabbix: HPE OneView vs Zabbix. HPE OneView is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 59% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 13% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
HPE OneView
August 2025
Get the report
Helped 865,985 peers since 2012

Featured HPE OneView reviews

Read more reviews

HPE OneView mindshare

As of August 2025, the mindshare of HPE OneView in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category stands at 1.4%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
HPE OneView1.4%
Zabbix12.8%
Datadog5.4%
Other80.4%
IT Infrastructure Monitoring

PeerResearch reports based on HPE OneView reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIT Infrastructure MonitoringAug 27, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE OneView vs ZabbixAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE OneView vs DatadogAug 27, 2025Download
ComparisonHPE OneView vs Auvik Network Management (ANM)Aug 27, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Zabbix4.212.8%95%107 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.35.4%97%188 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

HPE OneView's most valuable features include automation, easy management, and a centralized interface known as "single pane of glass". It allows for efficient time-saving tasks like VLAN configuration across multiple blades, server management from one platform, and firmware updates. Monitoring capabilities provide vital alerts and visibility. Automation and a user-friendly interface simplify infrastructure management, reducing human error. These features optimize deployment speed, ensure firmware compliance, and enhance operational efficiency.
  • "The analytics and monitoring tools in HPE OneView are superior to other network monitoring platforms such as Nagios, and the features include multiple modules that allow you to create and write your own scripts based on your requirements for different servers such as database servers or tapping roaming servers."
  • "The ease of management with HPE OneView is excellent."
  • "HPE OneView allows me to monitor access and check the health of the infrastructure in a single console."

Room for Improvement

HPE OneView requires improvements in integration with various storage systems and cloud platforms, enhancement of reporting capabilities, and increased performance speed. Users desire better support for non-HPE components and older hardware, more user-friendly interfaces, and customizable notifications. Enhanced role-based access control, automation for troubleshooting, and streamlined update processes are also desired. Support for VMware and improvements in technical support and pricing strategies have been highlighted as areas for potential enhancement.
  • "From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option."
  • "My main complaint is about the blades on the frames, which seem to have a lot of problems. We often have to call HPE for replacements, such as for memory."
  • "I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive."

ROI

Users highlight significant time savings in hardware configuration and reconfiguration when using HPE OneView. The ability to clone existing profiles to new hardware eliminates manual tasks, reducing setup time. Some organizations confirm they experienced a return on investment, though specific profit details vary, with some using it in non-profit projects.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers report mixed experiences with HPE OneView's pricing. Many find the solution affordable or even free for basic use, appreciating the cost-effectiveness. However, some highlight costs, particularly for server licenses and management features, suggesting prices may vary based on specific deployments like Synergy or older platforms. While some users see the price as high, others find it reasonable, emphasizing the importance of comparing with alternatives and considering additional expenses like warranties.
  • "I feel the product's price falls a bit on the higher side."
  • "I would rate the cost as six out of ten."
  • "When it comes to the government, money is never an issue, so it was excellent in terms of the HPE OneView licensing cost.Hitachi was cheaper, but I'd rate HPE OneView cost-wise as eight out of ten."

Popular Use Cases

HPE OneView is primarily used for monitoring and managing data center hardware, including servers, networks, and storage. It supports various infrastructure tasks such as server provisioning, centralized management, firmware upgrades, and incident response. Organizations leverage it to manage virtual data centers, Synergy frames, and conduct assessments. It helps reduce manual configurations, streamline operations, and automate server settings, ensuring seamless integration with cloud and on-premises environments while enabling efficient resource monitoring and control.

Service and Support

Feedback on HPE OneView's customer service and support varies widely. Some describe their technical support experience as responsive, knowledgeable, and efficient, especially with higher-tier engineers. Others struggle with initial support levels, citing issues with miscommunication and long resolution times. There is praise for deployment assistance and efficient solutions for minor issues, but criticisms arise regarding consistency and the need for escalation. Networking at conferences improves experiences for some, enhancing support by building direct contacts.

Deployment

HPE OneView's initial setup is known for being straightforward and simple. Users frequently mention its ease, with virtual appliances simplifying the process. While some find user-friendliness lacking, expertise in the setup often determines experiences. Challenges sometimes occur due to external factors like infrastructure readiness. Many users value the ease of installation and quick deployment, although earlier versions were more complex. Most users find the current process easy, often requiring minimal time and resources.

Scalability

HPE OneView is highly scalable, allowing integration of numerous servers based on company needs. Users are generally satisfied, noting recent improvements and enhancements in scalability. Multiple instances can be managed under a unified interface, accommodating expansive environments. Despite minor challenges with hardware-only management, the system adapts to evolving business requirements efficiently. The platform suits enterprises of different sizes, from small companies to large organizations with thousands of users, and supports expansive growth in infrastructure.

Stability

HPE OneView is mostly stable with many users experiencing minimal issues. Some reported initial instability in older versions, but improvements in newer releases have enhanced performance. Occasional problems like minor bugs and downtime were noted, particularly in earlier versions. Feedback suggests effective integration with existing systems. Users appreciate stability but acknowledge areas for improvement, especially in blade components. Proper communication with HPE is deemed essential for ongoing stability and performance.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our HPE OneView Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise42
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business105
Midsize Enterprise52
Large Enterprise228
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
University
4%
Non Profit
4%
Media Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Retailer
3%
Construction Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Sports Company
1%
Non Tech Company
1%

Compare HPE OneView with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about HPE OneView

HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.

HPE OneView was previously known as HP OneView.

HPE OneView customers

Asante, ITS Nordics, Columbus Communications, Mansfield Oil

Related questions

  • 30
Any experience with Event & Incident Analytic engines like Moogsoft?
  • 11
Windows 10 - what are your main concerns about upgrading?
  • 36
When evaluating IT Infrastructure Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 7
What advice would you give to others looking into implementing a mid-market monitoring solution?
  • 29
Zabbix vs. Groundwork vs. other IT Infrastructure Monitoring tools
  • 38
Anyone switching from SolarWinds NPM? What is a good alternative and why?
  • 28
What is the best tool for SQL monitoring in a large enterprise?
  • 7
How do you plan for a security review for infrastructure monitoring software?
  • 29
What are the advantages of using a paid (vs open source) IT Infrastructure Monitoring solution?
  • 33
What is ITOM (IT Operations Management)?

Product Categories

Product Categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Zabbix vs HPE OneView Logo
Zabbix vs HPE OneView
Datadog vs HPE OneView Logo
Datadog vs HPE OneView
New Relic vs HPE OneView Logo
New Relic vs HPE OneView
Elastic Observability vs HPE OneView Logo
Elastic Observability vs HPE OneView
SolarWinds NPM vs HPE OneView Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs HPE OneView
PRTG Network Monitor vs HPE OneView Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs HPE OneView
Nagios XI vs HPE OneView Logo
Nagios XI vs HPE OneView
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs HPE OneView
LogicMonitor vs HPE OneView Logo
LogicMonitor vs HPE OneView
Nagios Core vs HPE OneView Logo
Nagios Core vs HPE OneView
Centreon vs HPE OneView Logo
Centreon vs HPE OneView
Icinga vs HPE OneView Logo
Icinga vs HPE OneView
OpsRamp vs HPE OneView Logo
OpsRamp vs HPE OneView
Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView Logo
Cisco Intersight vs HPE OneView
BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs HPE OneView Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs HPE OneView
See all alternatives
 
HPE OneView Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Sr. Systems Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees4.0I use HPE OneView to manage Synergy frames for VMware ESXi hosts, benefiting from ease of management and streamlined upgrades. However, frequent blade issues require replacements, and aligning upgrades can be slow. We are also evaluating a Nutanix proof of concept.
Technology Management Consultant at National Institute for Smart Government - NISG4.5I've used HPE OneView for three years; it's stable, scalable, and offers strong monitoring and customization. Setup was simple, integration smooth, and support reliable. I appreciate its analytics, but dashboard customization could be more versatile.
Presales engineer and consultant at Hybrid Tech4.5I use HPE OneView for unified server and storage monitoring, which enhances operational efficiency by managing Synergy frames and blade servers in one console. However, the high cost of licenses is a significant drawback, impacting financial feasibility.
Server Applications Senior Administrator at Home Hardware Stores Limited4.0I use HPE OneView for managing Windows, Linux, backup servers, and Oracle database servers on-premises. Firmware compliance is highly valuable, though the update process could be faster. Overall, we've seen a return on investment without considering other solutions.
Senior Information Technology Analyst at Tata Consultancy3.5I use HPE OneView to manage our server infrastructure, benefiting from an easy initial setup and helpful technical support. While we appreciate managing everything from one place, we've experienced some hardware issues, particularly with RAM and hardware levers.
Senior Technical Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0No summary available
Technical Architect at HCL Technologies4.0No summary available
Team Lead for Core Infrastructure at Raiffeisen bank Serbia4.0I find HPE OneView valuable for configuring HPE servers and managing VLANs, though its functionality is lacking and the logs are inadequate. We complement it with Ansible for automation, enhancing our overall experience despite its limitations.