HPE OneView and Auvik compete in the IT management solutions category. Auvik holds the upper hand with its enhanced network visibility and customer service.
Features: HPE OneView provides centralized management, offering a single pane of glass for server, storage, and network management. It supports automation and simplifies deployment across HPE hardware. Auvik delivers superior network visibility and mapping, offering detailed traffic insights and intuitive visualizations, catering specifically to network management needs.
Room for Improvement: HPE OneView users seek faster performance, support for more hardware, and cloud integration. They also desire more detailed reporting features. Auvik users suggest better network mapping clarity, improved device integration, and enhanced automation for routine tasks to streamline network management processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE OneView is primarily on-premises, receiving mixed reviews for technical support, with effective resolutions and issues at first-level support. Auvik, a cloud-based solution, offers deployment flexibility and is praised for its customer service excellence, despite some users finding the initial setup complex.
Pricing and ROI: HPE OneView is perceived as expensive, but users report operational efficiencies that justify the cost, leading to a satisfactory return on investment. Auvik, though considered costly, is valued for its comprehensive features and offers flexible billing based on network devices. It's seen as more competitively priced for larger environments, with some leveraging free monitoring for certain devices.
Auvik Network Management has definitely helped reduce business disruptions related to network issues.
Auvik Network Management saves me 40% to 50% of our time.
If the network goes down, Auvik Network Management (ANM) opens a ticket, and then we begin working on it.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
I would give Auvik Network Management support a ten out of ten.
The customer service and support have been responsive.
I would give the quality of HPE OneView's technical support an eight out of ten rating, indicating good customer service and support in my opinion.
The technical support for HPE OneView rates as an 8 on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
We keep adding sites into Auvik Network Management, and it doesn't seem to affect performance or anything on our end.
HPE OneView is highly scalable, especially useful for organizations with large infrastructures.
HPE OneView is a scalable solution since you can integrate any number of servers based on your license.
Scalability is fine as we can add Synergy frames and extend many frames as needed.
A lot of platforms, especially when it comes to CRMs, CMSs, and ERPs, are still built on PHP and MySQL, which I feel is archaic now and slow to query.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
Auvik's automated reporting system also details interferences or any lagging other than outside interference from electrical sources.
The stability of the blades is concerning; we have frequent issues with blades having memory or power issues.
HPE OneView is a stable solution that works efficiently.
It supports unified monitoring effectively but may have areas for enhancement.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
Enhancements in API functionality and wider tool support for integration with PSA or RMM tools.
Auvik does a good job of nesting those devices. For example, a bunch of different servers will all be nested in one icon on the map, and when opened up, all those multiple servers can be seen.
The upgrade process is lengthy, requiring careful planning as we cannot match ESXi versions without aligning OneView first, leading to delays.
I believe the prices of HPE OneView should be reduced, as it is quite expensive.
From the dashboard and reporting perspective, HPE OneView could be improved by having multiple modules rather than just a single customization option.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
The pricing for Auvik Network Management (ANM) is great; it is comparable to other solutions, and for what it does, it actually provides more value for the money than some of the other major competitors.
Auvik Network Management (ANM) pricing or licensing is about 2,500 per year for approximately 4,000 endpoints, which is quite reasonable.
Customers need to pay a substantial amount for the licenses, especially when monitoring a large number of servers and storages.
Our main concern is managing expenses related to the VMware licensing model which affects blade usage.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
Its proactive monitoring and simplified troubleshooting have significantly impacted our efficiency in handling network management tasks.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
I can monitor everything in one view, which has significantly improved operational efficiency for us.
The ease of management with HPE OneView is excellent.
One of the best features of HPE OneView is that you get a complete architecture with a single click.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Auvik Network Management (ANM) | 0.8% |
HPE OneView | 1.4% |
Other | 97.8% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 140 |
Midsize Enterprise | 31 |
Large Enterprise | 21 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 22 |
Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
Large Enterprise | 51 |
Auvik Network Management provides comprehensive network monitoring with competitive pricing, offering advanced features and free management of non-critical devices.
Auvik Network Management is known for its intuitive interface and real-time network visibility. Users benefit from features like automated network discovery, mapping, alerting, and TrafficInsights for cost-effective bandwidth monitoring. Its integration with ConnectWise and ticketing systems enhances device inventory updates, SNMP monitoring, and network troubleshooting. However, improvements are needed in reporting, integration capabilities, network map accuracy, customization, and alert configuration. Users suggest expanding device support and improving navigation and monitoring features.
What are Auvik's most important features?Auvik Network Management is widely used by managed service providers and enterprises for network monitoring across industries. It enables efficient management of firewalls, switches, routers, and ensures connectivity over multiple locations. This solution aids in identifying issues, automating backups, and facilitating remote access, offering critical insights on network traffic and device performance. Companies leverage its features to enhance network management and performance.
HPE OneView is your infrastructure automation engine to simplify operations, increasing the speed of IT delivery for new applications and services. Through software defined intelligence, HPE OneView brings a new level of automation to infrastructure management by taking a template driven approach to provisioning, updating, and integrating compute, storage, and networking infrastructure. Designed with a modern, standard-based API and supported by a large and growing partner ecosystem, HPE OneView also makes it easy to integrate powerful infrastructure automation into existing IT tools and processes. Take command with HPE OneView to deploy infrastructure faster, simplify operations and increase productivity.
HPE OneView innovations provide you the industry’s best infrastructure management experience, simplifying operations for HPE BladeSystem, HPE ProLiant servers, 3PAR storage, HPE Networking and HPE ConvergedSystems.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.