Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Grafana Loki Logo

Grafana Loki Reviews

Vendor: Grafana Labs
4.1 out of 5

What is Grafana Loki?

Featured Grafana Loki reviews

Grafana Loki mindshare

As of December 2025, the mindshare of Grafana Loki in the Log Management category stands at 7.0%, down from 7.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Grafana Loki7.0%
Wazuh10.4%
Splunk Enterprise Security7.3%
Other75.3%
Log Management

PeerResearch reports based on Grafana Loki reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryLog ManagementDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana Loki vs WazuhDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana Loki vs Splunk Enterprise SecurityDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonGrafana Loki vs DatadogDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Wazuh3.710.4%81%50 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.35.1%97%209 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Nov 16, 2025

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business428
Midsize Enterprise222
Large Enterprise725
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
6%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Retailer
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%

Compare Grafana Loki with alternative products

Learn more about Grafana Loki

Related questions

 
Grafana Loki Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Regional Associate & Engineer at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I use Grafana Loki for infrastructure and network monitoring across sectors; it's cost-effective, performs well, and integrates with other Grafana tools, though setup complexity could be improved. Support is solid, and on-premises deployment is a plus.
Senior System Engineer at Novell3.5I use Grafana Loki for aggregating and displaying data through dashboards, particularly for Kubernetes and Docker. Its valuable features include integration with various sources, high availability, and effective performance monitoring, surpassing options like Elasticsearch or Kibana.
Manager Director at Earth4.5We use Grafana Loki across various sectors to monitor security and access to devices, utilizing dashboards for tracking. The key feature is log filtering by keywords, aiding quick issue resolution. However, direct Windows Server log access would be beneficial.
SRE at Incen AG4.0Grafana Loki, being open source and Kubernetes native, offers easy management and cost benefits over CloudWatch. However, stability issues arise when deploying in ECS due to integration challenges, making Kubernetes a preferred environment for control and monitoring solutions.
Engineering Lead- Cloud and Platform Architecture at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0Grafana Loki effectively processes unstructured logs and is cost-efficient, allowing logging to S3 and reading from S3. While its architecture is solid, simplifying the production-grade setup would boost adoption. Its use of Prometheus metadata is beneficial.
DevOps Engineer at Venturenox4.5I find Grafana Loki to be user-friendly and particularly appreciate its intuitive GUI, making deployment and management easier compared to Zabbix. However, improvements in alert types are needed. I use AWS for deployment and prefer Grafana for handling metrics.
DevOps Engineer at Orochi Network5.0I use Grafana for visualizing metrics from Prometheus and logs from Loki, managed by Promtail in our Kubernetes cluster. Grafana's lightweight nature is its most valuable feature. It's stable with no current need for improvements.
Information Technology Buyer at BNP Paribas Partners for Innovation3.5In my company, we use Grafana Loki for infrastructure and API monitoring, creating dashboards, and setting up alerts for specific events. It's simpler to set up than Elastic and Kibana, and we've saved time, although alerting limitations exist.