Datadog vs Grafana Loki comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datadog Logo
24,253 views|14,438 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Grafana Labs Logo
3,362 views|2,958 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datadog and Grafana Loki based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Datadog vs. Grafana Loki Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product.""Having a wealth of information has helped us investigate outages, and having historical data helps us tune our system.""Overall, the Data UI and the usability of customer features continue to improve.""The feature I have found most valuable is when I can reuse existing monitors and alerts for new dashboards.""The initial setup is very straightforward.""The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility.""The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment.""Datadog dashboards are pretty great."

More Datadog Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the capability to set up alerts, which becomes necessary when we need to receive notifications for specific events.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the tool's GUI. The solution's GUI is very user-friendly.""The solution's stability has never been a problem. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.""Loki also utilizes the same service discovery mechanism as used by Prometheus. So, whatever labeled metadata you see in Prometheus, you have the exact same metadata in the Loki system. Given this level of intricacy and the attempt to address these challenges, I firmly believe that Loki deserves praise for the work.""The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it is an open-source tool that is stable and flexible.""We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.""The effectiveness of filters is pivotal for optimizing the search process and extracting the specific information we need from the extensive log data.""I appreciate the capability to process logs from microservices and seamlessly integrate them into Grafana."

More Grafana Loki Pros →

Cons
"The more tools that they can build that allow you to run AWX playbooks, or other similar fixes, would benefit clients greatly.""Datadog could be improved if it could detect other software in a container or server.""The documentation leaves a lot to be desired for new users.""Datadog has a lot of features kind of cramped into one dashboard. It's quite hard to get around what feature does exactly what. There was a steep learning curve, trying to navigate through menus.""More granular control over dashboard sharing. Timeboard sharing.""It seems that admin cost control granularity is an afterthought.""Federated views for Datadog dashboards are critical as large companies utilize multiple instances of the product and cannot link the metrics or correlate the metrics together. This stunts the usage of Datadog.""The parallel editing of the dashboards should not cause users to lose the work of another person."

More Datadog Cons →

"There is a need for some change in the alerting types of the product. In short, a few changes in the alert area are needed due to minor shortcomings.""Enhancing speed could be a game-changer, and while it might vary depending on the application, it's a factor worth exploring.""We encountered certain limitations when it came to alerting, particularly when dealing with specific data sources.""The product must improve its UI.""The solution has shortcomings regarding security monitoring-oriented features that need improvement.""The solution's scalability depends on the team managing the Grafana instance.""The correlation of requests is not simple in Grafana Loki and can be improved.""The Docker container partition feature needs improvement as they do not reuse the space and goes into a pending state."

More Grafana Loki Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "​Pricing seems reasonable. It depends on the size of your organization, the size of your infrastructure, and what portion of your overall business costs go toward infrastructure."
  • "It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."
  • "Pricing and licensing are reasonable for what they give you. You get the first five hosts free, which is fun to play around with. Then it's about four dollars a month per host, which is very affordable for what you get out of it. We have a lot of hosts that we put a lot of custom metrics into, and every host gives you an allowance for the number of custom metrics."
  • "At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."
  • "The pricing and licensing through AWS Marketplace has been good. It would be nice if it was cheaper, but their pricing is reasonable for what it is. Sometimes, for their newer features, they charge as if it's fully fleshed out, even though it is a newer feature and it may have less stuff than their other items."
  • "It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost."
  • "The pricing came up a bit compared to their competitors. It is not that the price has risen, but that the competitors have gone down. They keep adding more features that I would have expected to be baked in at a more nominal price. I have been increasingly dissatisfied with the pricing, but not enough to jump ship."
  • "It didn't scale well from the cost perspective. We had a custom package deal."
  • More Datadog Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You can use the free version of Grafana Loki on-premises."
  • "My company doesn't need to pay for the licensing cost of the solution."
  • "We use a free version."
  • "The pricing structure varies based on the number of users; there might be specific taxes to pay for it."
  • "The solution is open source."
  • "I use the solution's open-source version. Grafana Loki is a completely free solution for me."
  • "I use the open-source version of the product."
  • "Grafana Loki is a free, open-source solution."
  • More Grafana Loki Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra… more »
    Top Answer:With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good core… more »
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network… more »
    Top Answer:We are using Grafana Loki as a database for real-time metrics.
    Top Answer:Since we are using the open-source version of Grafana Loki, we are not paying anything for the solution.
    Top Answer:There are a few features in the solution's enterprise version that are not given in the normal basic version. Visualization-wise, Grafana Loki's dashboard looks a little outdated compared to other… more »
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    24,253
    Comparisons
    14,438
    Reviews
    94
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    8.6
    13th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,362
    Comparisons
    2,958
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    518
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Dynatrace logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Azure Monitor logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    New Relic logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    AWS X-Ray logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Elastic Observability logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    Graylog logo
    Compared 48% of the time.
    Wazuh logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    syslog-ng logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Elastic Stack logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Datadog is a cloud monitoring solution that is designed to assist administrators, IT teams, and other members of an organization who are charged with keeping a close eye on their networks. Administrators can use Datadog to set real-time alerts and schedule automated report generation. They can deal with issues as they arise and keep up to date with the overall health of their network while still being able to focus on other tasks. Users can also track the historical performance of their networks and ensure that they operate at the highest possible level.

    Datadog Benefits

    Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Datadog include:

    • Gain an integrated view of the services and programs that IT teams are employing across their networks. Users can view and monitor all of the disparate programs that they have running across their networks with this one solution. They can track these programs across the entirety of the data’s life cycle.
    • Analyze and utilize massive amounts of data in real time. Datadog’s dashboards gather data in real time. Administrators can utilize their network’s data the minute that it becomes relevant to them. Decisions can be made based on the most current information available.
    • Keep your cloud network secured against digital threats. Datadog enables users to create alerts that will notify the minute that threats arise. IT teams and administrators can rapidly address any issue that comes up and prevent any existing problem from growing worse.
    • Easily get it up and running. Users can set up Datadog, configure it, and employ API integrations to connect it to external solutions with ease.

    Datadog Features

    • Customizable and prefabricated monitoring dashboards. Administrators are supplied with two different types of dashboards that they can choose from when they are setting up Datadog. They can customize the dashboards to fit any specialized monitoring need. Additionally, users can choose to use prefabricated dashboards that come with the solution.
    • Disaster recovery feature. Datadog has a built-in feature that enables organizations to continue functioning if some disaster strikes their network. If the network suffers damage, Datadog can restore lost data and infrastructure. Should a digital threat do damage to the network, Datadog ensures that the damage is not irreparable.
    • Vulnerability scanning tool. Users can keep ahead of threats to their networks by employing Datadog’s vulnerability scanning feature. This tool scans the entirety of a user’s network and warns them if a vulnerability is detected. Users can then move to patch these holes in their security before the threat to their network can escalate.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Datadog is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. It can offer organizations many advantages. Two major advantages are the dashboards that users can create and the monitoring capability that it gives system administrators.

    A senior manager in charge of site reliability engineering at Extra Space Storage writes, “The dashboards we created are core indicators of the health of our system, and it is one of the most reliable sources we have turned to, especially as we have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately. We can usually rely on logs to tell us what the apps are doing.”

    Housecall Pro’s senior director of DevOps writes, “We value the monitoring capability since it allows us to be pushed alerts, rather than having to observe graphs continually.

    Grafana Loki is a powerful log aggregation and analysis tool designed for cloud-native environments. Its primary use case is to collect, store, and search logs efficiently, enabling organizations to gain valuable insights from their log data.

    The most valuable functionality of Loki is its ability to scale horizontally, making it suitable for high-volume log data. It achieves this by utilizing a unique indexing approach called "Promtail," which efficiently indexes logs and allows for fast searching and filtering. Loki also supports log streaming in real-time, ensuring that organizations can monitor and analyze logs as they are generated.

    By centralizing logs in a single location, Loki simplifies log management and troubleshooting processes. It provides a unified view of logs from various sources, making it easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. With its powerful query language, organizations can extract meaningful information from logs, enabling them to gain insights into system performance, identify anomalies, and detect potential security threats.

    Loki's integration with Grafana, a popular open-source visualization tool, allows users to create rich dashboards and visualizations based on log data. This combination enhances the observability of systems and applications, enabling organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve overall operational efficiency.

    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization31%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise45%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise58%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    Buyer's Guide
    Datadog vs. Grafana Loki
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog vs. Grafana Loki and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Datadog is ranked 3rd in Log Management with 137 reviews while Grafana Loki is ranked 13th in Log Management with 12 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Grafana Loki is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana Loki writes "Effective for Logging, recovery from node failures is fast and single UI supports metrics, logs, and even tracing". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas Grafana Loki is most compared with Graylog, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and Elastic Stack. See our Datadog vs. Grafana Loki report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.